Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Blood Purif ; 38(1): 13-7, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25228136

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is important to know the relative clearances obtained when using single-needle versus double-needle cannulation techniques. METHOD: Twelve hemodialysis treatments were conducted using a machine that is capable of single-needle as well as double-needle cannulation. Single-needle and double-needle blood flow rates, as well as urea clearance, were compared. RESULTS: The measured blood flow rates were 368 ± 11 ml/min, 294 ± 4 ml/min, 200 ± 0 ml/min, and 100 ± 0 ml/min during double-needle hemodialysis and were 201 ± 10.9 ml/min, 173 ± 44.9 ml/min, 103 ± 4.1 ml/min, and 45 ± 4.9 ml/min during single-needle hemodialysis. The hemodialysis urea clearances at similar blood flow rate (approximately 200 ml/min) were 167 ± 4 ml/min and 161 ± 9 ml/min (paired t test; p > 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSION: The measured blood flow rates and urea clearances during single-needle hemodialysis were approximately half of the measured blood flow rate during double-needle hemodialysis, and should be used in selected settings.


Subject(s)
Catheterization/instrumentation , Needles , Renal Dialysis/instrumentation , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Blood Flow Velocity , Dialysis Solutions/chemistry , Dialysis Solutions/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Renal Dialysis/methods , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/blood , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/pathology , Urea/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...