Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Food Prot ; 67(11): 2500-14, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15553634

ABSTRACT

Four ready-to-eat smoked fish plants were monitored for 2 years to study Listeria contamination patterns and the impact of plant-specific Listeria control strategies, including employee training and targeted sanitation procedures, on Listeria contamination patterns. Samples from the processing plant environment and from raw and finished product were collected monthly and tested for Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes. Before implementation of intervention strategies, 19.2% of raw product samples (n = 276), 8.7% of finished product samples (n = 275), and 26.1% of environmental samples (n = 617) tested positive for Listeria spp. During and after implementation of Listeria control strategies, 19.0% of raw product samples (n = 242), 7.0% of finished product samples (n = 244), and 19.5% of environmental samples (n = 527) were positive for Listeria spp. In one of the four fish plants (plant 4), no environmental samples were positive for L. monocytogenes, and this plant was thus excluded from statistical analyses. Based on data pooled from plants 1, 2, and 3, environmental Listeria spp. prevalence was significantly lower (P < 0.05) for nonfood contact surfaces and the finished product area and for the overall core environmental samples after implementation of control strategies. Listeria prevalence for floor drains was similar before and after implementation of controls (49.6 and 54.2%, respectively). Regression analysis revealed a significant positive relationship (P < 0.05) between L. monocytogenes prevalence in the environment and in finished products before implementation of control strategies; however, this relationship was absolved by implementation of Listeria control strategies. Molecular subtyping (EcoRI ribotyping) revealed that specific L. monocytogenes ribotypes persisted in three processing plants over time. These persistent ribotypes were responsible for all six finished product contamination events detected in plant 1. Ribotype data also indicated that incoming raw material is only rarely a direct source of finished product contamination. While these data indicate that plant-specific Listeria control strategies can reduce cross-contamination and prevalence of Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes in the plant environment, elimination of persistent L. monocytogenes strains remains a considerable challenge.


Subject(s)
Fishes/microbiology , Food Contamination/analysis , Food-Processing Industry/standards , Listeria/isolation & purification , Seafood/microbiology , Animals , Environmental Microbiology , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Equipment Contamination , Fish Products/microbiology , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Food Handling/methods , Food Microbiology , Food-Processing Industry/methods , Listeria/growth & development , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Longitudinal Studies , Smoke
2.
J Food Prot ; 67(6): 1163-9, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15222544

ABSTRACT

Two ready-to-eat crawfish processing plants were monitored for 2 years to study the impact of Listeria control strategies, including employee training and targeted sanitation procedures, on Listeria contamination. Environmental, raw material, and finished product samples were collected weekly during the main processing months (April to June) and tested for Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes. Before implementation of control strategies (year 1), the two processing plants showed Listeria spp. prevalences of 29.5% (n = 78) in raw, whole crawfish, 5.2% (n = 155) in the processing plant environment, and 0% (n = 78) in finished products. In year 2, after plant-specific Listeria control strategies were implemented, Listeria spp. prevalence increased in raw crawfish (57.5%, n = 101), in the processing plant environment (10.8%, n = 204), and in the finished product (1.0%, n = 102). Statistical analysis showed a significant increase in Listeria spp. prevalence (P < 0.0001) and a borderline nonsignificant increase in L. monocytogenes prevalence (P = 0.097) on raw material in year 2. Borderline nonsignificant increases were also observed for Listeria spp. prevalence in environmental samples (P = 0.082). Our data showed that Listeria spp. prevalence in raw crawfish can vary significantly among seasons. However, the increased contamination prevalence for raw materials only resulted in a limited Listeria prevalence increase for the processing plant environment with extremely low levels of finished product contamination. Heat treatment of raw materials combined with Listeria control strategies to prevent cross-contamination thus appears to be effective in achieving low levels of finished product contamination, even with Listeria spp. prevalences for raw crawfish of more than 50%.


Subject(s)
Astacoidea/microbiology , Food Contamination , Food-Processing Industry/standards , Listeria monocytogenes/growth & development , Shellfish/microbiology , Animals , Fish Products/microbiology , Food Contamination/analysis , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Food Handling/methods , Food Microbiology , Listeria/growth & development , Prevalence , Seasons
3.
J Food Prot ; 67(5): 1022-6, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15151244

ABSTRACT

Only limited data are available on the growth characteristics of Listeria in naturally contaminated ready-to-eat foods. To evaluate Listeria contamination patterns and growth in smoked salmon, 72 smoked salmon product samples from two processing plants were tested for Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes. Samples were divided into four approximately equal portions: one portion was tested on receipt, and the other three were vacuum sealed and stored at 4 degrees C for 7, 14, and 28 days. Listeria testing was performed using both an enrichment procedure and direct plating to enumerate Listeria in samples that contained >2 to 10 CFU/g. Five samples were positive for Listeria spp., including one sample that was positive for L. monocytogenes. Most samples yielded only sporadic positive results among the portions tested on days 0, 7, 14, and 28. Only one sample contained Listeria spp. in numbers above the detection limit for enumeration. For this sample, the portions tested on days 7 and 28 contained 46 and 52 CFU/g, respectively, whereas the portion tested on day 14 was negative. Overall, our data indicate that there is considerable heterogeneity in Listeria spp. distribution within a single positive smoked fish sample. Even with refrigerated storage for 28 days, none of the naturally contaminated samples reached Listeria spp. numbers >100 CFU/g, which indicates that Listeria growth was limited within a 4-week storage period. However, because of the apparent heterogeneity of Listeria distribution within samples, the interpretation of growth data collected on naturally contaminated samples is difficult.


Subject(s)
Fish Products/microbiology , Food Contamination/analysis , Food Handling/methods , Listeria/growth & development , Salmon/microbiology , Animals , Colony Count, Microbial , Consumer Product Safety , Food-Processing Industry/standards , Humans , Listeria/isolation & purification , Listeria monocytogenes/growth & development , Prevalence , Seafood/microbiology , Temperature , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...