Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Curr Opin Psychiatry ; 22(3): 269-73, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19339888

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review current evidence linking amphetamine use with aggression and to consider possible factors that might underlie this association. RECENT FINDINGS: Although evidence that amphetamine use is related to increased levels of aggression continues to grow, the underlying processes or mechanisms remain somewhat elusive. In this review, three possible underlying factors are considered. Neurotoxic, pharmacological effects of amphetamine on the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems are related to aggressive, hostile behavior in both animal and human studies. Of particular interest is the converging evidence that amphetamine use is related to impairment in executive functions (including self-control) that are regulated by the prefrontal cortex. Taken together, these findings suggest that amphetamine users may have an impaired capacity to control or inhibit aggressive impulses. Furthermore, high levels of impulsivity related to amphetamine use may also play a role. Finally, amphetamine use is associated with increased positive symptoms of psychosis, particularly paranoia, that contribute to a perception of the environment as a hostile, threatening place. SUMMARY: Taken separately, each of these factors may lead to an increase in aggression with increased use of amphetamine, but their interactive or synergistic effects may be particularly problematic.


Subject(s)
Aggression/psychology , Amphetamine , Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders , Hostility , Paranoid Disorders , Psychotic Disorders , Social Behavior , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders/epidemiology , Humans , Paranoid Disorders/epidemiology , Paranoid Disorders/etiology , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/etiology
2.
Addict Behav ; 34(4): 380-5, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19097704

ABSTRACT

Methamphetamine (MA) use is associated with hostility, aggression, and positive psychotic symptoms. However, little is known of the processes or mechanisms that underlie this relationship. The present research was designed to investigate putative mediating and moderating variables between MA dependence and hostility in a sample of injecting MA users (N=237). Both positive symptoms of psychosis and higher levels of impulsivity functioned as mediators and moderators of this relationship. This pattern of findings suggests that MA use leads to greater hostility by increasing positive psychotic symptoms that contribute to a perception of the environment as a hostile and threatening place as well as by increasing impulsivity. Those who were high in positive symptoms and high in impulsivity were the most hostile. Individual differences in impulsivity and positive psychotic symptoms should be taken into account in the assessment and management of MA dependence.


Subject(s)
Amphetamine-Related Disorders/psychology , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders/psychology , Methamphetamine/adverse effects , Psychoses, Substance-Induced/psychology , Adult , Amphetamine-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Australia , Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Male , Neural Pathways/drug effects , Psychoses, Substance-Induced/diagnosis , Risk Factors
3.
Prev Med ; 43(6): 466-71, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16920183

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a short-term tobacco-focused intervention for high school students referred by school administrators because of tobacco use. METHOD: A sample of 56 adolescents (66% male, mean age 15 years) was recruited through referrals from three state high schools. Participants were randomly assigned to a one-hour motivational interview (MI) session or to standard care (advice/education). The two groups were followed up at one, three, and six-month intervals. RESULTS: The MI intervention resulted in significant short-term reductions in quantity and frequency of smoking relative to standard care, however, effects were not maintained at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Improvements in refusal self-efficacy were significant relative to standard care. CONCLUSION: For adolescents who are established smokers and at high risk of other problems, motivational interviewing was associated with modest short-term gains relative to standard care.


Subject(s)
Interview, Psychological , Program Evaluation , School Health Services , Schools/organization & administration , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Prevention , Adolescent , Behavior Therapy/methods , Counseling/methods , Female , Health Education , Humans , Male , Motivation , Organizational Policy , Queensland , Self Efficacy , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...