Assessing the role of visual dysfunctions in the association between visual symptomatology and the use of digital devices / Evaluación del papel de las disfunciones visuales en la asociación entre la sintomatología visual y el uso de dispositivos digitales

Purpose: To evaluate the association between visual symptoms and use of digital devices considering the presence of visual dysfunctions. Methods: An optometric examination was conducted in a clinical sample of 346 patients to diagnose any type of visual anomaly. Visual symptoms were collected using the validated SQVD questionnaire. A threshold of 6 hours per day was used to quantify the effects of digital device usage and patients were divided into two groups: under and above of 35 years old. A multivariate logistic regression was employed to investigate the association between digital device use and symptoms, with visual dysfunctions considered as a confounding variable. Crude and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each variable. Results: 57.02 % of the subjects reported visual symptoms, and 65.02% exhibited some form of visual dysfunction. For patients under 35 years old, an association was found between having visual symptoms and digital device use (OR = 2.10, p = 0.01). However, after adjusting for visual dysfunctions, this association disappeared (OR = 1.44, p = 0.27) and the association was instead between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 6.52, p < 0.001), accommodative (OR = 10.47, p < 0.001), binocular (OR = 6.68, p < 0.001) and accommodative plus binocular dysfunctions (OR = 46.84, p < 0.001). Among patients over 35 years old, no association was found between symptoms and the use of digital devices (OR = 1.27, p = 0.49) but there was an association between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 3.54, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Visual symptoms are not dependent on the duration of digital device use but rather on the presence of any type of visual dysfunction: refractive, accommodative and/or binocular one, which should be diagnosed.(AU)

Assessing the role of visual dysfunctions in the association between visual symptomatology and the use of digital devices.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between visual symptoms and use of digital devices considering the presence of visual dysfunctions. METHODS: An optometric examination was conducted in a clinical sample of 346 patients to diagnose any type of visual anomaly. Visual symptoms were collected using the validated SQVD questionnaire. A threshold of 6 hours per day was used to quantify the effects of digital device usage and patients were divided into two groups: under and above of 35 years old. A multivariate logistic regression was employed to investigate the association between digital device use and symptoms, with visual dysfunctions considered as a confounding variable. Crude and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each variable. RESULTS: 57.02 % of the subjects reported visual symptoms, and 65.02% exhibited some form of visual dysfunction. For patients under 35 years old, an association was found between having visual symptoms and digital device use (OR = 2.10, p = 0.01). However, after adjusting for visual dysfunctions, this association disappeared (OR = 1.44, p = 0.27) and the association was instead between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 6.52, p < 0.001), accommodative (OR = 10.47, p < 0.001), binocular (OR = 6.68, p < 0.001) and accommodative plus binocular dysfunctions (OR = 46.84, p < 0.001). Among patients over 35 years old, no association was found between symptoms and the use of digital devices (OR = 1.27, p = 0.49) but there was an association between symptoms and refractive dysfunction (OR = 3.54, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Visual symptoms are not dependent on the duration of digital device use but rather on the presence of any type of visual dysfunction: refractive, accommodative and/or binocular one, which should be diagnosed.

Validation of the Symptom Questionnaire for Visual Dysfunctions (SQVD): A Questionnaire to Evaluate Symptoms of any Type of Visual Dysfunctions.

PURPOSE: To assess psychometric properties of the Symptom Questionnaire for Visual Dysfunctions (SQVD) questionnaire, including accuracy, validity, and reliability, in a clinical sample of patients having any type of visual dysfunction. METHODS: A clinical sample of 306 patients self-administered the SQVD. Rasch analysis was performed to analyze the functionality of the response categories, fit statistics, differential item functioning (DIF), person and item reliability, targeting, local dependency, unidimensionality, and transformation table. Accuracy was assessed by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, using symptoms reported in each patient's clinical record as the gold standard for classifying patients with and without symptoms. The concurrent validity, known group validity, and test-retest reliability (repeatability, using the intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) were also examined. RESULTS: SQVD showed orderly category responses. The 14 items fit the Rasch model without significant DIF for gender, presbyopia, and dysfunctions. Person and item reliabilities were 0.81 and 0.85, respectively. Targeting was -1.49 logits. Yen's Q3 statistic showed no local dependency. SQVD was unidimensional (first contrast of the residual = 1.852 eigenvalue with a variance explained by measures of 52.23%). The area under the ROC curve was 0.836 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.792-0.879) with a cutoff of ≥6 showing good accuracy (sensitivity = 0.759; specificity = 0.783). SQVD showed good concurrent and known group validity and high repeatability (ICC, 0.857; 95% CI, 0.710-0.933) when administered twice 1 week apart. CONCLUSIONS: SQVD has shown good psychometric properties. It can be considered an accurate, valid, and reliable questionnaire to detect visual symptoms related to any type of refractive, accommodative, and binocular dysfunction. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: SQVD may be used for diagnostic purposes, as it can accurately detect symptoms related to any sort of visual dysfunction. It may also be useful to monitor the treatment outcomes of these conditions.

Objective changes in astigmatism during accommodation.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown small but clinically significant changes in the power and axis of astigmatism when the eye accommodates. Monocular objective measurements of the eye during accommodation, when the object approaches the eye without convergence, also reveal small astigmatic changes. Moreover, it is known that the eye exhibits ocular cyclotorsion at different gaze angles. Since accommodation and convergence normally occur simultaneously, we studied the change in the magnitude and axis of astigmatism during accommodation for different convergence angles. METHODS: The left eye of 15 subjects between 20 and 49 years old (mean 28.5 ± 9.7 years) having ≤1.5 D astigmatism was evaluated. Measurements were made using a Shack-Hartmann aberrometer for an accommodation range of +0.50 D to -10 D in 0.50 D steps, and for four monocular convergence demands: 0°, 5°, 10° and 15°. Statistical analysis used power vectors to quantify the change in cylinder power and axis for each accommodation and convergence demand with age. RESULTS: Jackson cross-cylinder component J45 did not change during accommodation for all vergences tested. However, J0 changed by an average of -0.02 D per dioptre of accommodation (D/Dacc) for convergence demands of 0°, 5° and 10° and -0.03 D/Dacc for the 15° demand. This corresponds to an average cylinder power change of -0.05 D/Dacc for convergences of 0°, 5° and 10° and -0.08 D/Dacc for 15° of convergence. The cylinder axis always changed towards 90° (against-the-rule), and age did not play a significant role. CONCLUSIONS: Except for accommodation demands >4 D, we did not find a clinically significant change in astigmatism for convergence angles up to 15º. The small changes in cylinder power and axis may be due to shifts in the position of the crystalline lens during accommodation.

Rasch analysis for development and reduction of Symptom Questionnaire for Visual Dysfunctions (SQVD).

To develop the Symptom Questionnaire for Visual Dysfunctions (SQVD) and to perform a psychometric analysis using Rasch method to obtain an instrument which allows to detect the presence and frequency of visual symptoms related to any visual dysfunction. A pilot version of 33 items was carried out on a sample of 125 patients from an optometric clinic. Rasch model (using Andrich Rating Scale Model) was applied to investigate the category probability curves and Andrich thresholds, infit and outfit mean square, local dependency using Yen's Q3 statistic, Differential item functioning (DIF) for gender and presbyopia, person and item reliability, unidimensionality, targeting and ordinal to interval conversion table. Category probability curves suggested to collapse a response category. Rasch analysis reduced the questionnaire from 33 to 14 items. The final SQVD showed that 14 items fit to the model without local dependency and no significant DIF for gender and presbyopia. Person reliability was satisfactory (0.81). The first contrast of the residual was 1.908 eigenvalue, showing unidimensionality and targeting was - 1.59 logits. In general, the SQVD is a well-structured tool which shows that data adequately fit the Rasch model, with adequate psychometric properties, making it a reliable and valid instrument to measure visual symptoms.