Ensuring Indigenous co-leadership in health research: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example.

BACKGROUND: Indigenous people are insightful and informed about their own health and wellness, yet their visions, strengths and knowledge are rarely incorporated into health research. This can lead to subpar engagement or irrelevant research practices, which exacerbates the existing health inequities Indigenous people experience compared to the non-Indigenous population. Data consistently underscores the importance of Indigenous self-determination in research as a means to address health inequities. However, there are few formal methods to support this goal within the existing research context, which is dominated by Western perspectives. MAIN TEXT: Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (Can-SOLVE CKD) is a patient-oriented research network in Canada that recognizes the need to create the space to facilitate Indigenous self-determination in research. Indigenous members of the network therefore created and evolved a unique group, called the Indigenous Peoples' Engagement and Research Council (IPERC). IPERC plays a critical role in informing Can-SOLVE CKD research priorities, as well as creating tools to support Indigenous-specific research and engagement. This approach ensures that Indigenous voices and knowledge are critical threads within the fabric of the network's operations and research projects. Here, we describe the methods taken to create a council such as IPERC, and provide examples of initiatives by the council that aim to increase Indigenous representation, participation and partnership in research. We share lessons learned on what factors contribute to the success of IPERC, which could be valuable for other organizations interested in creating Indigenous-led research councils. CONCLUSION: Indigenous self-determination in research is critical for addressing health inequities. Here, we present a unique model, led by a council of diverse Indigenous people, which could help reduce health equities and lead to a better era of research for everyone.

A Framework to Ensure Patient Partners Have Equal and Contributing Voices Throughout the Research Program Evaluation Process.

PURPOSE OF PROGRAM: Traditionally, peer review was a closed process conducted only by individuals working in the research field. To establish a more integrated and patient-centered approach, one of Canada's largest kidney research networks (Can-SOLVE CKD) has created a Research Operations Committee (ROC) that includes patients as key members. The ROC represents one way for achieving meaningful patient-oriented research (POR). SOURCE OF INFORMATION: Can-SOLVE CKD, a network created as part of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR). METHODS: The ROC consists of patients, physicians, scientists, Indigenous partners, experts in research methodology, and a member of Can-SOLVE CKD's operational team. On an annual basis, Can-SOLVE CKD's research teams provide the ROC with a review package, which incorporates information from patient engagement check-in calls and surveys, the project's knowledge translation plan and products, and a progress report written by the project team. The ROC evaluates the review package and provides feedback and recommendations accordingly. KEY FINDINGS: The transparent nature of the process, regular feedback and review, along with an overt accountability and scoring system, has been embraced by both patients and researchers. As a result of the ROC process, the number of patient leads for each project has grown over a 3-year period and more researchers have received POR and cultural sensitivity training. LIMITATIONS: While anecdotal evidence suggests this approach is beneficial for achieving POR, formal mechanisms of evaluation are currently lacking. IMPLICATIONS: This ROC framework ensures patients are active contributors throughout the research process and could be adopted by other organizations to achieve a more patient-centered approach to research.

OBJECTIF DU PROGRAM: L'évaluation par les pairs consiste habituellement en un processus fermé et mené uniquement par des personnes travaillant dans le domaine de la recherche. Pour développer une approche plus intégrée et davantage axée sur les patients, un des plus importants réseaux canadiens de recherche sur les maladies rénales (Can-SOLVE CKD) a créé un comité de gestion de la recherche (CGR) où les patients sont des membres à part entière. Une approche qui vise la conduite d'activités de recherches significatives et davantage orientées vers le patient. SOURCE: Can-SOLVE CKD, un réseau créé dans le cadre de la Stratégie de recherche axée sur le patient (SRAP) des Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada (IRSC). MÉTHODOLOGIE: Le CGR rassemble des patients, des médecins, des chercheurs, des partenaires autochtones, des experts en méthodologie de recherche et un membre de l'équipe d'intervention de Can-SOLVE CKD. Une fois par année, l'équipe de recherche de Can-SOLVE CKD fournit au CGR un dossier d'examen. Ce dossier contient les informations recueillies lors d'appels ou de sondages vérifiant l'engagement des patients, le plan d'application des connaissances du projet et ses résultats, de même qu'un rapport périodique rédigé par l'équipe responsable du projet. Le CGR évalue ce dossier et émet ses commentaires et recommandations. PRINCIPAUX RÉSULTATS: La transparence du processus, la rétroaction et la révision sur une base régulière, de même que les systèmes de responsabilité et de notation ouverts ont été adoptés tant par les patients que par les chercheurs. Grâce à ce processus, le nombre de patients candidats pour chaque projet a augmenté sur une période de trois ans, et davantage de chercheurs ont reçu une formation sur les réalités culturelles et la pratique d'activités de recherche axées sur le patient. LIMITES: Bien que des preuves anecdotiques suggèrent que cette approche soit bénéfique à la conduite de recherches axées sur le patient, des mécanismes formels pour son évaluation manquent toujours. CONCLUSION: Le cadre proposé par le CGR assure une contribution active des patients tout au long du processus de recherche. Ce program pourrait être adopté par d'autres organizations et permettre la réalisation d'activités de recherche davantage axées sur le patient.

Preferences for a self-management e-health tool for patients with chronic kidney disease: results of a patient-oriented consensus workshop.

BACKGROUND: Electronic health (e-health) tools may support patients' self-management of chronic kidney disease. We aimed to identify preferences of patients with chronic kidney disease, caregivers and health care providers regarding content and features for an e-health tool to support chronic kidney disease self-management. METHODS: A patient-oriented research approach was taken, with 6 patient partners (5 patients and 1 caregiver) involved in study design, data collection and review of results. Patients, caregivers and clinicians from across Canada participated in a 1-day consensus workshop in June 2018. Using personas (fictional characters) and a cumulative voting technique, they identified preferences for content for 8 predetermined topics (understanding chronic kidney disease, diet, finances, medication, symptoms, travel, mental and physical health, work/school) and features for an e-health tool. RESULTS: There were 24 participants, including 11 patients and 6 caregivers, from across Canada. The following content suggestions were ranked the highest: basic information about kidneys, chronic kidney disease and disease progression; reliable information on diet requirements for chronic kidney disease and comorbidities, renal-friendly foods; affordability of medication, equipment, food, financial resources and planning; common medications, adverse effects, indications, cost and coverage; symptom types and management; travel limitations, insurance, access to health care, travel checklists; screening and supports to address mental health, cultural sensitivity, adjusting to new normal; and support to help integrate at work/school, restrictions. Preferred features included visuals, the ability to enter and track health information and interact with health care providers, "on-the-go" access, links to resources and access to personal health information. INTERPRETATION: A consensus workshop developed around personas was successful for identifying detailed subject matter for 8 predetermined topic areas, as well as preferred features to consider in the codevelopment of a chronic kidney disease self-management e-health tool. The use of personas could be applied to other applications in patient-oriented research exploring patient preferences and needs in order to improve care and relevant outcomes.

Content and Quality of Websites for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: An Environmental Scan.

BACKGROUND: Although numerous websites for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are available, little is known about their content and quality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of CKD websites, and the degree to which they align with information needs identified by patients with CKD. METHODS: We identified websites by entering "chronic kidney disease" in 3 search engines: Google.com (with regional variants for Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States), Bing.com, and Yahoo.com. We included the first 50 unique English-language sites from each search. We evaluated website content using a 30-point scale comprising 8 priority content domains identified by patients with CKD (understanding CKD, diet, symptoms, medications, mental/physical health, finances, travel, and work/school). We used standardized tools to evaluate usability, reliability, and readability (DISCERN, HONcode, LIDA, Reading Ease, and Reading Grade Level). Two reviewers independently conducted the search, screen, and evaluation. RESULTS: Of the 2093 websites identified, 115 were included. Overall, sites covered a mean (SD) of 29% (17.8) of the CKD content areas. The proportion of sites covering content related to understanding CKD, symptoms, and diet was highest (97%, 80%, and 72%, respectively). The proportion of sites covering travel, finances, and work/school content was lowest (22%, 12%, and 12%, respectively). The mean (SD) scores for DISCERN, LIDA and HONcode were 68% (14.6), 71% (14.4), and 75% (17.2), respectively, considered above average for usability and reliability. The mean (SD) Reading Grade Level was 10.6 (2.8) and Reading Ease was 49.8 (14.4), suggesting poor readability. CONCLUSIONS: Although many CKD web sites were of reasonable quality, their readability was poor. Furthermore, most sites covered less than 30% of the content patients identified as important for CKD self-management. These results will inform content gaps in internet-accessible information on CKD self-management that should be addressed by future eHealth web-based tools.

CONTEXTE: Bien qu'il existe de nombreux sites Web s'adressant aux patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC), on en sait peu sur leur qualité et sur la pertinence de leur contenu. OBJECTIFS: Évaluer la qualité de sites Web traitant de l'IRC et vérifier s'ils sont en phase avec les besoins d'information formulés par les patients. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons répertorié des sites Web en entrant chronic kidney disease (insuffisance rénale chronique) dans trois moteurs de recherche, soit Google.com (et ses variantes régionales australienne, canadienne, britannique et étatsunienne), Bing.com et Yahoo.com. Ont été inclus les 50 premiers sites en anglais s'affichant sur chacun. Le contenu a été évalué avec une échelle en 30 points englobant huit domaines d'intérêt cités par les patients atteints d'IRC, soit Understanding CKD (comprendre l'IRC), Diet (régime alimentaire), Symptoms (symptômes), Medications (médicaments), Mental/Physical Health (santé physique/mentale), Finances (finances), Travel (voyage) et Work/School (travail/études). Des outils normalisés (DISCERN, HONcode, LIDA, Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level) ont été employés pour évaluer la convivialité, la fiabilité et la lisibilité des contenus. Deux examinateurs ont procédé à la recherche, au triage et à l'évaluation des sites de façon indépendante. RÉSULTATS: Des 2 093 sites répertoriés, 115 ont été inclus. Dans l'ensemble, ceux-ci couvraient les domaines d'intérêt à 29 % (17,8) en moyenne. La compréhension de l'IRC (97 %), les symptômes (80 %) et le régime alimentaire (72 %) se sont révélés les sujets abordés par une plus grande proportion des sites évalués. Les voyages (22 %), la situation financière (12 %) et le travail/les études (12 %) constituaient quant à eux les sujets les moins couverts. Les scores moyens pour DISCERN (68 % [14,6]), LIDA (71 % [14,4]) et HONcode (75 % [17,2]) se sont avérés au-dessus de la moyenne pour la convivialité et la fiabilité. Le score moyen au Reading Grade Level était de 10,6 (2,8) et celui du Reading Ease était de 49,8 (14,4), suggérant une faible lisibilité. CONCLUSION: Bien que la qualité de plusieurs sites Web traitant de l'IRC se soit révélée satisfaisante, leur lisibilité était faible. De plus, la plupart couvraient moins de 30 % du contenu jugé important par les patients dans l'autogestion de la maladie. Ces résultats mettront en lumière les lacunes de l'information accessible sur internet quant à l'autogestion de l'IRC; lacunes qui devraient être comblées par les futurs outils de santé en ligne.

Identifying Needs for Self-management Interventions for Adults With CKD and Their Caregivers: A Qualitative Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Fostering the ability of patients to self-manage their chronic kidney disease (CKD), with support from caregivers and providers, may slow disease progression and improve health outcomes. However, little is known about such patients' needs for self-management interventions. We aimed to identify and describe the needs of adults with CKD and informal caregivers for CKD self-management support. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and focus groups. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 6 focus groups (37 participants) and 11 telephone interviews with adults with CKD (stages 1-5, not on renal replacement therapy) and informal caregivers from across Canada. ANALYTIC APPROACH: Thematic analysis. RESULTS: 3 major themes were identified: (1) empowerment through knowledge (awareness and understanding of CKD, diet challenges, medication and alternative treatments, attuning to the body, financial implications, mental and physical health consequences, travel and transportation restrictions, and maintaining work and education), (2) activation through information sharing (access, meaningful and relevant, timing, and amount), and (3) tangible supports for the health journey (family, community, and professionals). LIMITATIONS: Participants were primarily white, educated, married, and English speaking, which limits generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: There are opportunities to enhance CKD self-management support by addressing knowledge pertinent to living well with CKD and priority areas for sharing information and providing tangible support. Future efforts may consider the development of innovative CKD self-management support interventions based on the diverse patient and caregiver needs identified in this study.

Self-management interventions for adults with chronic kidney disease: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify and describe self-management interventions for adult patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). SETTING: Community-based. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with CKD stages 1-5 (not requiring kidney replacement therapy). INTERVENTIONS: Self-management strategies for adults with CKD. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Using a scoping review, electronic databases and grey literature were searched in October 2016 to identify self-management interventions for adults with CKD stages 1-5 (not requiring kidney replacement therapy). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, qualitative and mixed method studies were included and study selection and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers. Outcomes included behaviours, cognitions, physiological measures, symptoms, health status and healthcare. RESULTS: Fifty studies (19 RCTs, 7 quasi-experimental, 5 observational, 13 pre-post intervention, 1 mixed method and 5 qualitative) reporting 45 interventions were included. The most common intervention topic was diet/nutrition and interventions were regularly delivered face to face. Interventions were administered by a variety of providers, with nursing professionals the most common health professional group. Cognitions (ie, changes in general CKD knowledge, perceived self-management and motivation) were the most frequently reported outcome domain that showed improvement. Less than 1% of the interventions were co-developed with patients and 20% were based on a theory or framework. CONCLUSIONS: There was a wide range of self-management interventions with considerable variability in outcomes for adults with CKD. Major gaps in the literature include lack of patient engagement in the design of the interventions, with the majority of interventions not applying a behavioural change theory to inform their development. This work highlights the need to involve patients to co-developed and evaluate a self-management intervention based on sound theories and clinical evidence.