Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Phys Med ; 103: 108-118, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36272328

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The first aim was to generate and compare synthetic-CT (sCT) images using a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) method (Pix2Pix) for MRI-only prostate radiotherapy planning by testing several generators, loss functions, and hyper-parameters. The second aim was to compare the optimized Pix2Pix model with five other architectures (bulk-density, atlas-based, patch-based, U-Net, and GAN). METHODS: For 39 patients treated by VMAT for prostate cancer, T2-weighted MRI images were acquired in addition to CT images for treatment planning. sCT images were generated using the Pix2Pix model. The generator, loss function, and hyper-parameters were tuned to improve sCT image generation (in terms of imaging endpoints). The final evaluation was performed by 3-fold cross-validation. This method was compared to five other methods using the following imaging endpoints: the mean absolute error (MAE) and mean error (ME) between sCT and reference CT images (rCT) of the whole pelvis, bones, prostate, bladder, and rectum. For dose planning analysis, the dose-volume histogram metric differences and 3D gamma analysis (local, 1 %/1 mm) were calculated using the sCT and reference CT images. RESULTS: Compared with the other architectures, Pix2Pix with Perceptual loss function and generator ResNet 9 blocks showed the lowest MAE (29.5, 107.7, 16.0, 13.4, and 49.1 HU for the whole pelvis, bones, prostate, bladder, and rectum, respectively) and the highest gamma passing rates (99.4 %, using the 1 %/1mm and 10 % dose threshold criterion). Concerning the DVH points, the mean errors were -0.2% for the planning target volume V95%, 0.1 % for the rectum V70Gy, and -0.1 % for the bladder V50Gy. CONCLUSION: The sCT images generated from MRI data with the Pix2Pix architecture had the lowest image errors and similar dose uncertainties (in term of gamma pass-rate and dose-volume histogram metric differences) than other deep learning methods.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Prostate , Male , Humans , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Pelvis , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy Dosage
2.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 43(3): 448-454, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35177547

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging provides critical information about fetal brain growth and development. Currently, morphologic analysis primarily relies on manual segmentation, which is time-intensive and has limited repeatability. This work aimed to develop a deep learning-based automatic fetal brain segmentation method that provides improved accuracy and robustness compared with atlas-based methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 106 fetal MR imaging studies were acquired prospectively from fetuses between 23 and 39 weeks of gestation. We trained a deep learning model on the MR imaging scans of 65 healthy fetuses and compared its performance with a 4D atlas-based segmentation method using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The trained model was also evaluated on data from 41 fetuses diagnosed with congenital heart disease. RESULTS: The proposed method showed high consistency with the manual segmentation, with an average Dice score of 0.897. It also demonstrated significantly improved performance (P < .001) based on the Dice score and 95% Hausdorff distance in all brain regions compared with the atlas-based method. The performance of the proposed method was consistent across gestational ages. The segmentations of the brains of fetuses with high-risk congenital heart disease were also highly consistent with the manual segmentation, though the Dice score was 7% lower than that of healthy fetuses. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed deep learning method provides an efficient and reliable approach for fetal brain segmentation, which outperformed segmentation based on a 4D atlas and has been used in clinical and research settings.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging
3.
Phys Med ; 89: 265-281, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34474325

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In radiotherapy, MRI is used for target volume and organs-at-risk delineation for its superior soft-tissue contrast as compared to CT imaging. However, MRI does not provide the electron density of tissue necessary for dose calculation. Several methods of synthetic-CT (sCT) generation from MRI data have been developed for radiotherapy dose calculation. This work reviewed deep learning (DL) sCT generation methods and their associated image and dose evaluation, in the context of MRI-based dose calculation. METHODS: We searched the PubMed and ScienceDirect electronic databases from January 2010 to March 2021. For each paper, several items were screened and compiled in figures and tables. RESULTS: This review included 57 studies. The DL methods were either generator-only based (45% of the reviewed studies), or generative adversarial network (GAN) architecture and its variants (55% of the reviewed studies). The brain and pelvis were the most commonly investigated anatomical localizations (39% and 28% of the reviewed studies, respectively), and more rarely, the head-and-neck (H&N) (15%), abdomen (10%), liver (5%) or breast (3%). All the studies performed an image evaluation of sCTs with a diversity of metrics, with only 36 studies performing dosimetric evaluations of sCT. CONCLUSIONS: The median mean absolute errors were around 76 HU for the brain and H&N sCTs and 40 HU for the pelvis sCTs. For the brain, the mean dose difference between the sCT and the reference CT was <2%. For the H&N and pelvis, the mean dose difference was below 1% in most of the studies. Recent GAN architectures have advantages compared to generator-only, but no superiority was found in term of image or dose sCT uncertainties. Key challenges of DL-based sCT generation methods from MRI in radiotherapy is the management of movement for abdominal and thoracic localizations, the standardization of sCT evaluation, and the investigation of multicenter impacts.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4.
Cancer Radiother ; 24(4): 288-297, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32179006

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In context of head-and-neck radiotherapy, this study aims to compare MR image quality according to diagnostic (DIAG) and radiotherapy (RT) setups; and to optimise an MRI-protocol (including 3D T1 and T2-weighted sequences) for dose-planning (based on pseudo-CT generation). MATERIALS AND METHODS: To compare DIAG and RT setups, signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and percentage-image-uniformity (PIU) were computed on T1 images of phantoms and volunteers. Influence of the sample conductivity on SNR was quantified using homemade phantoms. To obtain reliable T1 and T2 images for RT-planning, an experimental design was performed on volunteers by using SNR, contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) and mean-opinion-score (MOS). Further, pseudo-CTs were generated from 8 patients T2 images with a state-of-art deep-learning method. These pseudo-CTs were evaluated by mean-absolute-error (MAE) and mean-error (ME). RESULTS: SNR was higher for DIAG-setup compared to RT-setup (SNR-ratio=1.3). A clear influence of the conductivity on SNR was observed. PIU was higher for DIAG-setup (38.8%) compared to RT-setup (33.5%). Regarding the protocol optimisation, SNR, CNR, and MOS were 20.6, 6.16, and 3.91 for the optimal T1 sequence. For the optimal T2 sequence, SNR, CNR and MOS were 25.6, 44.46 and 4.0. In the whole head-and-neck area, the mean MAE and ME of the pseudo-CTs were 82.8 and -3.9 HU. CONCLUSION: We quantified the image quality decrease induces by using an RT-setup for head-and-neck radiotherapy. To compensate this decrease, an MRI protocol was optimised by using an experimental design. This protocol of 15minutes provides accurate images which could be used for MRI-dose-planning in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Patient Positioning/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Equipment Design , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Patient Positioning/standards , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Time Factors
5.
Cancer Radiother ; 21(8): 788-798, 2017 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28690126

ABSTRACT

MRI-based radiotherapy planning is a topical subject due to the introduction of a new generation of treatment machines combining a linear accelerator and a MRI. One of the issues for introducing MRI in this task is the lack of information to provide tissue density information required for dose calculation. To cope with this issue, two strategies may be distinguished from the literature. Either a synthetic CT scan is generated from the MRI to plan the dose, or a dose is generated from the MRI based on physical underpinnings. Within the first group, three approaches appear: bulk density mapping assign a homogeneous density to different volumes of interest manually defined on a patient MRI; machine learning-based approaches model local relationship between CT and MRI image intensities from multiple data, then applying the model to a new MRI; atlas-based approaches use a co-registered training data set (CT-MRI) which are registered to a new MRI to create a pseudo CT from spatial correspondences in a final fusion step. Within the second group, physics-based approaches aim at computing the dose directly from the hydrogen contained within the tissues, quantified by MRI. Excepting the physics approach, all these methods generate a synthetic CT called "pseudo CT", on which radiotherapy planning will be finally realized. This literature review shows that atlas- and machine learning-based approaches appear more accurate dosimetrically. Bulk density approaches are not appropriate for bone localization. The fastest methods are machine learning and the slowest are atlas-based approaches. The less automatized are bulk density assignation methods. The physical approaches appear very promising methods. Finally, the validation of these methods is crucial for a clinical practice, in particular in the perspective of adaptive radiotherapy delivered by a linear accelerator combined with an MRI scanner.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Humans
6.
Rev. chil. pediatr ; 62(1): 61-8, ene.-feb. 1991. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-104710

ABSTRACT

El síndrome hemolítico urémico (SHU) es heterogéneo en su etiología, fisiopatología, tratamiento y diagnóstico. En esta presentación se analizan algunos aspectos de su epidemiología, clínica e inmunopatología. La distribución del SHU es universal, pero en Argentina, sur de Europa, Sudáfrica y oeste de USA se detecta con mayor frecuencia que en el resto de los países. Los estudios inmunopatológicos muestran lesiones angiopáticas trombóticas consistentes en alteración generalizada del epitelio capilar y arteriolar. Entre los factores que aparentemente participan en la génesis del síndrome se analizan la disminución de los niveles de prostaglandina PGT2, del factor de von Willebrand y las toxinas de origen microbiano. La diálisis es una de las herramientas más útiles en el manejo del SHU. A pesar de los actuales conocimientos, todavía se requiere más investigación para conocer los mecanismos íntimos del síndrome


Subject(s)
Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/etiology , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/physiopathology , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...