The Importance of Scar Cosmesis across the Surgical Specialties: Factors, Perceptions, and Predispositions.

Existing disparities in the perception of scars between patients and practitioners can translate into undesirable physical and psychological outcomes. An understanding of the determinants of surgeons' perceptions on the importance of scar cosmesis is a first step toward bridging this gap. Methods: In an online survey, surgeons were asked about the extent to which various patient and technical factors affect the importance of scar cosmesis. Additional data were obtained on surgeon characteristics, including their specialty, gender, years of experience, and work sector to investigate potential relationships. Results: A total of 303 responses were obtained from surgeons across six specialties. Based on the survey, the importance of scar cosmesis was rated highest among plastic surgeons and obstetricians and gynecologists, and lowest among orthopedic and vascular surgeons. Compared with surgeons in private practice, publicly employed surgeons' rating of the importance of cosmesis was lower. The patient's request for a cosmetic outcome was the most highly rated factor. Regarding the influence of patient demographics on surgeons' attitudes, scar cosmesis in young and female patients was favored in comparison with older and male patients. Factors that reduced the importance of cosmesis were emergency and late-night surgeries followed by lengthy procedures, large incisions, and busy operative lists. Conclusions: These initial findings highlight a need to investigate means of fostering a more holistic, impartial approach toward scar cosmesis, as well as addressing potential workplace barriers that may prevent surgeons from seeking a more cosmetic result. Greater alignment between the priorities of surgeons and patients may manifest in objective and subjective improvements in patient's scars and well-being.

Internal pudendal perforator artery flap harvesting without pre-operative imaging: Reliability and approach.

Since its initial description in 1996 by Yii and Niranjan, the internal pudendal perforator flap (also known as the Singapore flap, the gluteal fold flap, and the lotus petal flap) has become a workhorse in perineal soft tissue reconstruction. In 2001, Hashimoto described the presence of three to five perforators in the perineal anogenital triangle. The ischial tuberosity has thus become a useful anatomic landmark for the safe boundary of medial dissection during flap elevation, in order to avoid damaging the perforator vessels. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the perforators' positions within the anogenital triangle by using color Doppler ultrasound. In a study of 15 subjects in the lithotomy position, we identified a total of 24 perforator vessels with a diameter greater than 5 mm. We noted the vessels' positions using orthonormal measurements, according to the distance from the midline and the distance on a straight line between the two ischial tuberosities (i.e. consistent bony anatomic landmarks that are independent of the patient's height and body mass index). The mean distance between the ischial tuberosity and the internal pudendal perforator was 27.3 mm. Based on our present results, we consider that routine ultrasound identification and dissection of the perforators is not always required before pudendal flap harvesting. This decreases the operating time and simplifies the flap harvesting procedure.

How to Save a Life From Macroscopic Fat Embolism: A Narrative Review of Treatment Options.

Macroscopic fat embolism (MAFE) has grabbed the attention of the plastic surgery community in recent years because of its high mortality rate. Many articles on preventing MAFE during gluteal fat grafting are available in the literature. However, total prevention is difficult: a number of factors, both technical and human, mean that MAFE remains a potential complication. This review was written with the main goal of providing a treatment plan. MAFE shares many similar pathophysiologic and hemodynamic features with massive thrombotic pulmonary embolism (PE), especially the associated cardiopulmonary decompensation. Lessons learned from PE management were used to devise a management algorithm for MAFE. The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and its potential application as a main modality of treatment for MAFE was explored. The lack of evidence in the literature for the treatment of MAFE, and its high mortality, lent urgency to the need to write an article on the management aspect in the form of a narrative review, to ensure that every plastic surgeon practicing gluteal fat grafting is knowledgeable about the treatment aspect of this deadly complication.