Preliminary outcomes following cryosurgical ablation of the prostate in patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate is a novel therapeutic modality that induces cell lysis in the prostate by direct application of low temperatures. We have been conducting an ongoing prospective pilot study of the use of cryosurgical prostate ablation in treating patients with nonmetastatic prostate adenocarcinoma since January 1993. Results in 145 consecutive patients with mean 36 months and minimum 12 months of followup are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Accrual was open to patients with clinical stages T1a to T3c prostate adenocarcinoma. Pelvic lymph node dissections were recommended but not required for patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 15 ng./ml. before study entry. PSA changes, random prostate biopsy findings and morbidities after cryosurgical prostate ablation were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: Overall actuarial rates at 42 months for maintaining PSA less than 0.3 and less than 1.0 were 59% and 66%, respectively. The overall actuarial progression-free rate at 60 months was 56%. Among 160 biopsies performed 16% showed some evidence of residual carcinoma. Overall crude rates of maintaining either a negative biopsy or PSA less than 0.3 at 6 and 24 months after cryosurgical prostate ablation were 87% and 73%, respectively. Significantly higher morbidities were seen in previously radiated patients undergoing cryosurgical prostate ablation compared to those with no prior radiation. Among nonradiated patients 85% experienced no significant morbidity after cryosurgical prostate ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Although preliminary, short-term outcomes after cryosurgical prostate ablation appear to be comparable to identical outcomes reported for external beam radiotherapy. Based on these results cryosurgical prostate ablation appears to be an effective therapeutic alternative for treating patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma.

Nephrectomy before interleukin-2 therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma remains challenging and controversial. There is some evidence of improved response to interleukin-2 (IL-2) based immunotherapy in patients who undergo nephrectomy before systemic treatment. However, recent reports have suggested that surgery prior to immunotherapy may not be an efficient strategy, since many patients will not be able to receive systemic treatment after nephrectomy. We describe our criteria for determining which patients are candidates for nephrectomy before immunotherapy and present our series of patients treated with this approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on our initial experience with IL-2 based immunotherapy we developed certain inclusion criteria for treatment with initial nephrectomy followed by systemic immunotherapy, including greater than 75% debulking of tumor burden possible, no central nervous system, bone or liver metastases, adequate pulmonary and cardiac function, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. In addition, patients in whom biopsies show other than predominantly clear cell type histology are excluded. From 1991 through 1996, 28 patients met these criteria and were treated with this approach. Patients were followed to determine the number receiving immunotherapy as well as overall response and survival rates. RESULTS: Radical nephrectomy was performed in all patients. One patient died of respiratory failure from disease progression 1 month after nephrectomy. Another patient had poor pulmonary function and, therefore, was treated with an alternative cytokine therapy. The remaining 26 patients (93%) received at least 1 course of IL-2. Median interval between nephrectomy and initiation of immunotherapy was 1.5 months (range 1 to 3). Overall response rate was 39% with 5 complete (18%) and 6 partial (21%) responses. Actuarial median survival of the entire group was 20.5 months (range 1 to 66) from the initiation of treatment. Currently 13 patients are alive, including 8 who are disease and/or progression-free. CONCLUSIONS: Using these strict criteria nephrectomy can be effectively performed before immunotherapy without compromising the likelihood that patients will receive systemic treatment. The activity of IL-2 in patients treated with this approach is encouraging and justifies its consideration in properly selected patients.

Histological evidence of an inflammatory reaction to suture material in the dog vas deferens.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in histology and semen variables after using an elastomeric-hydrogel matrix plug as a reversible vasectomy device in dogs, and to determine the potential applications for improving fertility after vasectomy reversal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Semen samples from six adult male dogs were obtained after left vasal ligation, placement of the plug in the right vas deferens, and subsequent removal of the plug. The vasa, epididymides and testes were evaluated histologically in four of the dogs after removal of the implant. RESULTS: No sperm were present in the ejaculate after the plug was removed. Histological sections showed intraluminal spermatids in areas where the plug had been placed. The lumen was occluded, secondary to foreign-body giant-cell reaction, at the vasotomy suture site, but other areas of the was previously containing the implant remained patent after it was removed. CONCLUSIONS: There were no sperm in the ejaculate after the plug was removed because the vasal lumen was occluded as a result of an inflammatory reaction to the suture material. In contrast, areas that had contained the implant but without a vasotomy suture were not inflamed. We suggest that further trials comparing various suture materials are carried out to determine if patency rates can be improved during vasotomy closure or vasovasotomy.

Standard intravesical therapies for interstitial cystitis.

The treatment of interstitial cystitis is difficult and at time frustrating--both for the patient and for the physician. Treatment is hampered by the lack of a clear understanding of its pathophysiology, which makes it difficult to objectively assess disease severity and/or progression. Intravesical therapy appears to be the most successful approach to the relief of symptoms. Clearly, there are drawbacks to intravesical therapy, particularly Clorpactin lavage. Responses to intravesical lavage are variable in duration, unpredictable, and unamenable to objective measurement. Multiple treatments are frequently needed, as with DMSO, and multiple anesthetics may be required for Clorpactin therapy. There have been no double-blind, placebo-controlled studies comparing the mainstays--Clorpactin and DMSO--of intravesical treatment. It is hoped that current research into the pathogenesis and causation of interstitial cystitis will lead to an improved understanding of this disease or syndrome. The introduction of newer, more specific intravesical therapies will surely follow such advances.