Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
2.
PLoS One ; 14(2): e0207138, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30742636

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile (CD) is the leading cause of infectious health-care associated diarrhea. However, little is known regarding CD carriage and transmission amongst asymptomatic colonizers. We evaluated carriage, characterized strains and examined epidemiologic linkages in asymptomatic colonized CD patients. METHODS: Rectal swabs from asymptomatic patients admitted to the general medicine ward from April 1-June 30 2012 were collected. PCR-confirmed CD colonies were ribotyped and characterized by Modified-Multi Locus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Analysis (MMLVA). RESULTS: 1549-swabs were collected from 474-patients. Overall, 50/474(10.6%) were CD PCR-positive, 24/50 were colonized at admission, while 26/50 were first identified > = 72 hours after admission. Amongst the 50 CD PCR-positive patients, 90% were asymptomatically colonized and 80% of individuals carried toxigenic CD-strains, including ribotype-027 (5/45:11%). MMLVA revealed five-clusters involving 15-patients harboring toxigenic (4/5) and non-toxigenic CD strains (1/5). In two clusters, patients were CD positive on admission while in the other three clusters involving 10 patients, we observed CD transmission from asymptomatically colonized patients to 8 previously CD-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: We identified increasing rates of colonization during admission to medical wards. MMLVA typing effectively discriminated between strains and suggests that 20% of patients with CD colonization acquired their strain(s) from asymptomatically colonized individuals in hospital.


Subject(s)
Carrier State/microbiology , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross Infection/microbiology , Diarrhea/microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Rectum/microbiology , Ribotyping/methods , Tertiary Care Centers , Young Adult
3.
J Hum Lact ; 34(2): 350-354, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29584524

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Unpasteurized human donor milk typically contains a variety of bacteria. The impact of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission of the donor's infant and duration of lactation on bacterial contamination of human milk is unknown. Research aim: This study aimed (a) to describe the frequency/concentration of skin commensal bacteria and pathogens in unpasteurized human donor milk and (b) to assess the impact of NICU admission and (c) the duration of milk expression on bacterial colonization of donated milk. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of human milk donated to the Rogers Hixon Ontario Human Milk Bank from January 2013 to June 2014. Milk samples from each donor were cultured every 2 weeks. RESULTS: The study included 198 donor mothers, of whom 63 had infants admitted to the NICU. Of 1,289 cultures obtained, 1,031 (80%) had detectable bacterial growth and 363 (28%) yielded bacterial growth in excess of 107 cfu/L, a local threshold for allowable bacteria prior to pasteurization. The mean (standard deviation) donation period per donor was 13.0 (7.5) weeks. Milk from mothers with NICU exposure had significantly higher concentrations of commensals, but not pathogens, at every time period compared with other mothers. For every 1-month increase in donation from all donors, the odds ratio of presence of any commensal in milk increased by 1.13 (95% confidence interval [1.03, 1.23]) and any pathogen by 1.31 (95% confidence interval [1.20, 1.43]). CONCLUSION: Commensal bacteria were more abundant in donor milk expressed from mothers exposed to neonatal intensive care. Bacterial contamination increased over the milk donation period.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Milk, Human/microbiology , Adult , Bacterial Load/methods , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Milk, Human/metabolism , Odds Ratio , Ontario , Retrospective Studies
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 58(7): 980-3, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24577290

ABSTRACT

This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that no longer routinely reporting urine culture results from noncatheterized medical and surgical inpatients can greatly reduce unnecessary antimicrobial therapy for asymptomatic bacteriuria without significant additional laboratory workload. Larger studies are needed to confirm the generalizability, safety, and sustainability of this model of care.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Asymptomatic Infections , Bacteriuria/drug therapy , Unnecessary Procedures , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Aged , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Bacteriuria/diagnosis , Drug Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Inpatients , Male , Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosis
5.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 35(3): 225-30, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24521585

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Identify factors affecting the rate of hand hygiene opportunities in an acute care hospital. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Medical and surgical in-patient units, medical-surgical intensive care unit (MSICU), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and emergency department (ED) of an academic acute care hospital from May to August, 2012. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare workers. METHODS: One-hour patient-based observations measured patient interactions and hand hygiene opportunities as defined by the "Four Moments for Hand Hygiene." Rates of patient interactions and hand hygiene opportunities per patient-hour were calculated, examining variation by room type, healthcare worker type, and time of day. RESULTS: During 257 hours of observation, 948 healthcare worker-patient interactions and 1,605 hand hygiene opportunities were identified. Moments 1, 2, 3, and 4 comprised 42%, 10%, 9%, and 39% of hand hygiene opportunities. Nurses contributed 77% of opportunities, physicians contributed 8%, other healthcare workers contributed 11%, and housekeeping contributed 4%. The mean rate of hand hygiene opportunities per patient-hour was 4.2 for surgical units, 4.5 for medical units, 5.2 for ED, 10.4 for NICU, and 13.2 for MSICU (P < .001). In non-ICU settings, rates of hand hygiene opportunities decreased over the course of the day. Patients with transmission-based precautions had approximately half as many interactions (rate ratio [RR], 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.80]) and hand hygiene opportunities per hour (RR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.29-0.77]) as did patients without precautions. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring hand hygiene opportunities across clinical settings lays the groundwork for product use-based hand hygiene measurement. Additional work is needed to assess factors affecting rates in other hospitals and health care settings.


Subject(s)
Hand Hygiene/statistics & numerical data , Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Housekeeping, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff/statistics & numerical data , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...