Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Community Genet ; 11(2): 205-213, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31659621

ABSTRACT

Despite some controversy, true BRCA1/2 non-carriers are generally considered to be at an average risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Primary care physicians are then expected to encourage their non-carrier patients to adopt cancer screening practices appropriate to women of the same age in the general population. This study aimed to describe breast and ovarian cancer screening recommendations that primary care physicians would consider advisable for young true BRCA1/2 non-carriers. One hundred thirty-four family physicians and 123 gynecologists (response rate 45%) completed a cross-sectional mailed survey administered in the Province of Quebec, Canada. The survey included questions about basic genetic knowledge and screening recommendations for two fictitious cases (< 40 years), one carrier and one non-carrier, from a BRCA1/2 mutation-positive family. Screening exams considered advisable did not differ significantly between family physicians and gynecologists. More than 75% of physicians considered the cancer risks of true non-carriers to be comparable with that of the general population and 14% to be a little higher. Still, 53% would prescribe a biennial and or even an annual (27%) mammography to a non-carrier woman before the recommended starting age. Physician considerations of non-carriers' expectations or requests for screening were associated with more screening prescriptions. More than half of primary care physicians would recommend more mammography screenings than expected for a young true BRCA1/2 non-carrier. Personalized cancer risk assessment may help primary care physicians tailor screening of women from BRCA1/2 mutation-positive families and allow these women to make more informed choices regarding cancer risk management options.

2.
Pharmacotherapy ; 20(11): 1396-9, 2000 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11079289

ABSTRACT

A woman with acute leukemia receiving induction chemotherapy with conventional doses of cytarabine (ARA-C) 200 mg/m2/day and daunorubicin 45 mg/m2/day developed acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respiratory failure was attributed to ARA-C primarily by exclusion and radiographic findings. She was weaned rapidly from the ventilator after receiving steroid therapy.


Subject(s)
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Cytarabine/adverse effects , Daunorubicin/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myeloid/drug therapy , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/chemically induced , Aged , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Cytarabine/therapeutic use , Fatal Outcome , Female , Humans , Radiography , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...