ABSTRACT
Functional assessment in neurocognitive evaluation is often provided via informant reports. These subjective reports can vary based on the characteristics of informants and their relationships with participants, such as informant sex. However, whether informant sex intersects with participant sex to impact subjective ratings of participants' daily functioning, and whether such effects mirror observed patterns in neuropsychological performance, has not been adequately examined with ethnoracially diverse samples. We examined differences among participant-informant sex-based dyads on subjective informant reports of participants' daily functioning (assessed via the Functional Activities Questionnaire [FAQ]), and whether any observed differences on reported functioning corresponded to differences in objective participant performance on neuropsychological performance, among middle-aged and older Hispanic/Latino (n = 543), non-Hispanic Black (NHB; n = 1030), and non-Hispanic White (NHW; n = 5356) adults in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center cohort (n = 6929). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) tests revealed significant dyad differences on FAQ scores in the NHB (p<.001) and NHW subsamples (p<.05), but not in the Hispanic/Latino subsample (p>.05). For the Hispanic/Latino and NHB subsamples, ANCOVA tests revealed no significant effects of dyad on neuropsychological performance (ps>.01), whereas for the NHW subsample, ANCOVA tests revealed significant dyad differences on performance in multiple cognitive domains (ps<.01). Nevertheless, the pattern of dyad differences on neuropsychological performance did not mirror the pattern of observed differences on FAQ scores in the NHW subsample. Findings and their implications, including potential contributions of other informant characteristics on observed dyad differences on reported functioning, are discussed.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Assessing one's functional capacity-in addition to neuropsychological performance-is essential for determining neurocognitive status, and functional assessment is often provided via informant report. Although informant characteristics have been shown to influence reports of participant functioning, the degree to which they moderate relationships between reported functioning and participant performance on neuropsychological testing is unclear. Moreover, associations among informant characteristics, reported functioning, and neuropsychological performance have not been adequately examined with non-Hispanic Black (NHB) samples, despite this population's disproportionately high risk of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. METHOD: In this cross-sectional observational study, we examined the influence of informant characteristics on informant reports of participant functioning (assessed via the Functional Activities Questionnaire [FAQ]) and associations between reported functioning and participant performance on neuropsychological testing, among NHB adult participants in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center cohort (n = 1024). RESULTS: Informants who were younger, female, more educated, knew participants longer, or lived with participants reported poorer participant functioning (p < .001). However, younger (vs. older) informants provided reports of functioning that were more predictive of visuoconstructional ability and visual memory, and male (vs. female) informants provided reports of functioning that were more predictive of verbal memory, visuoconstructional ability and visual memory, and language (ps < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of neurocognitive evaluations of NHB participants, informant characteristics may influence subjective reports of participants' functioning and the extent to which reported functioning corroborates objective participant performance on neuropsychological testing.
