A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Treatment of Ankle Fractures With Syndesmotic Rupture: Suture-Button Fixation Versus Cortical Screw Fixation.

Ankle fractures accompanied by syndesmotic rupture are a complex challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Sufficient reduction and stabilization of the syndesmosis are important to prevent early degeneration of the ankle joint and to optimize clinical outcomes. The purpose of the study was to systematically review the literature comparing the suture-button fixation method with the cortical screw fixation method when treating syndesmotic rupture. For this, a systematic review of the literature was performed that included Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase. The following search terms were used: ankle fractures, syndesmosis rupture, tibiofibular syndesmosis injury, ankle joint, tightrope, and suture button. Inclusion criteria were comparison studies, acute ankle fractures with syndesmotic rupture, adult patients, and Coleman score >60. Cadaveric studies, chronic instability, open fractures, polytrauma, and arthropathies were exclusion criteria. Two investigators independently reviewed titles and relevant abstracts. Reoperation and malreduction rates were compared in a meta-analysis. Six studies with 275 patients were included: 2 randomized controlled trials and 2 prospective and 2 retrospective cohort studies. All studies used similar surgical techniques. Functional outcomes (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scale and the Olerud-Molander score) were not quantitatively comparable. No significantly less number of malreduction events were detected in the suture-button group (risk ratio = 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.03 to 1.04, p = .06). Significantly lower reoperation rate was detected in the suture-button group (risk ratio = 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.69, p = .01). We conclude that the suture-button technique showed a significantly lower reoperation rate and tendency toward less malreduction and better American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scale scores. This finding is clinically relevant; however, this conclusion is primarily based on 2 studies, and therefore the interest for further research increases.

Opioid prescriptions before and after high-energy trauma.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the legal use of opioids in adult patients before and after high-energy trauma. DESIGN: The study was a retrospective database study. SETTING: Clinical care outside hospitals. PATIENTS: All patients who suffered high-energy trauma and were brought to Odense University Hospital (OUH), Denmark, in 2007 and 2008 were retrieved from the trauma database. These patients were linked with data on opioid use from the regional prescription database. In all, 938 patients were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Redemption of opioid prescription during the 6 months prior to a multitrauma or redemption of two or more prescriptions for opioids 6 months or later after a multitrauma. RESULTS: Of the 938 patients brought to OUH with severe trauma within the study period, 61 patients died (7 percent) and six of these had redeemed prescriptions for opioids within 6 months prior to the trauma (10 percent) compared to 65 patients of the 877 survivors (7 percent) (odds ratio 1.4, nonsignificant). In all, 62 patients (7 percent) redeemed opioid prescriptions later than 6 months after their trauma and in a multivariable analysis, severe injury itself and severe injuries of the lower extremities were associated with redemption of opioid prescription after the trauma. CONCLUSIONS: The authors did not find any correlation between death by trauma and redemption of opioid prescriptions within the 6 months before the trauma. More severe traumas and especially severe traumas to the lower extremities were associated with redemption of opioid prescriptions after multitrauma.

Remodeling of Salter-Harris type II epiphyseal plate injury of the distal radius.

The authors studied the relation between residual angulation at the time of healing and final orientation of the distal radius as well as the clinical outcome in patients after Salter-Harris type II epiphyseal plate injury of the distal radius. Eighty-five patients were reviewed with a median follow-up of 8.5 years. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken at follow-up. The mobility of both wrists and forearms was examined, together with grip strength. Pain with activities and sports was evaluated. At follow-up, 73 patients (86%) were anatomically normal on radiographs; the remaining 12 patients had an incomplete remodeling of the volar and/or radial inclination of the distal radius. Premature closure of the growth plate in the distal radius or ulna did not occur in any of these children. Complete remodeling was seen in children aged up to 10 years in all but one patient. Remodeling after Salter-Harris type II epiphyseal plate injury occurs in all age groups, but the potential is greater in children up to 10 years of age. The incomplete remodeling does not seem to have any substantial long-term negative effect on mobility of the wrist and grip strength.

Missed injuries in a level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Major trauma presents major diagnostic and therapeutic problems. Any delay in providing the treatment necessary may lead to increased morbidity and mortality, prolonged length of hospital stay, and increased cost. This study was undertaken to determine the extent, contributing factors, and implication of missed injuries and relate them to the three surveys in a Danish Level I trauma center. METHODS: The records of all major traumatized patients admitted to the Odense University Hospital from January 1996 through December 1999 have been studied to determine the extent and type of missed injuries. The initial examination is carried out by the trauma team in the A&E department according to standard protocols. Resuscitation is carried out according to Advanced Trauma Life Support principles and details are documented in the patient journal and in a special trauma journal. RESULTS: Sixty-four of 786 patients (incidence, 8.1%) had 86 missed injuries. The missed injuries averaged 1.3 injuries per patient. There were 45 male and 19 female patients, with a median age of 33 years (range, 12-81 years). The median ISS was 17 (range, 4-50); 14%, 38%, and 48% of the injuries were missed in primary, secondary, and tertiary surveys, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that missed injuries can occur at any stage of the management of patients with major trauma. Repeated assessments, both clinical and radiologic, are mandatory to diminish the problem. In initial assessment, one still has to treat the greatest threat to life before complete diagnosis of all injuries, but alertness to evolving injuries must remain throughout the patient's stay in hospital.