Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients With Augmented Renal Clearance.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether established ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) dosing is adequate for patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC) and bacterial infection. METHODS: ARC (creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥ 130 mL/min) was confirmed by directly measured CrCl in 11 critically ill patients in a phase 1 pharmacokinetics study. Patients received 3 g C/T (ceftolozane 2 g/tazobactam 1 g) as a 60-minute intravenous infusion. Pharmacokinetic sampling occurred at 0 (predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the start of the infusion. Noncompartmental analyses were conducted on concentration data. The following pharmacodynamic targets were evaluated: time that free (unbound) drug concentrations exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) of 4 µg/mL for ceftolozane and time that the unbound concentration exceeded the 1 µg/mL target threshold (fT>threshold = 1 µg/mL) for > 20% of the dosing interval for tazobactam. Safety was evaluated. RESULTS: Mean (SD) area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity, clearance and volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) were 236 (118) h*µg/mL, 10.4 (4.5) L/h and 30.8 (10.8) L, respectively, for ceftolozane; and 35.5 (18.5) h*µg/mL, 35.3 (16.5) L/h and 54.8 (20.1) L, respectively, for tazobactam. Clearance and Vss were higher for both ceftolozane and tazobactam in patients with ARC compared with healthy individuals. The mean estimated ceftolozane fT>MIC at 4 µg/mL was 86.4%; the mean estimated tazobactam fT>threshold = 1 µg/mL was 54.9%. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ARC, a 3 g C/T dose met respective pharmacodynamic targets for ceftolozane and tazobactam. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02387372.

Plasma pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane/tazobactam in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: The antipseudomonal cephalosporin/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination ceftolozane/tazobactam could be a potential treatment option for cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of ceftolozane/tazobactam in children with CF merits further evaluation. METHODS: This is a retrospective subgroup analysis of a phase 1, noncomparative trial that characterized PK, safety, and tolerability of single intravenous doses of ceftolozane/tazobactam in pediatric patients. This analysis compares ceftolozane and tazobactam plasma PK parameters, estimated from a population PK model, between patients with and without CF enrolled in that trial. Individual attainment of PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) targets of ceftolozane and tazobactam (free ceftolozane concentration >4 µg/mL for >30% and free tazobactam concentration >1 µg/mL for 20% of the dosing interval) in patients with and without CF were evaluated. RESULTS: The study enrolled 18 patients aged greater than or equal to 2 to less than 18 years old, which included 9 with CF. Weight-normalized ceftolozane PK parameters were similar between patients with CF (clearance: 0.16 L/h/kg, half-life: 1.54 hours, volume of distribution: 0.26 L/kg) and without CF (clearance: 0.15 L/h/kg, half-life: 1.62 hours, volume of distribution: 0.26 L/kg), as were most weight-normalized tazobactam PK parameters. Weight-normalized tazobactam clearance was higher in patients with CF (0.73 L/h/kg) than patients without CF (0.42 L/h/kg). All patients achieved the prespecified PK/PD targets for ceftolozane and tazobactam. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis demonstrated generally similar weight-normalized plasma PK parameters for ceftolozane and tazobactam among children with and without CF; thus, projected doses for treatment of pediatric hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia, which are higher than the pediatric complicated urinary tract infection/intra-abdominal infection doses, may be appropriate for treatment of CF pulmonary exacerbation.

Lung penetration, bronchopulmonary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile and safety of 3 g of ceftolozane/tazobactam administered to ventilated, critically ill patients with pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: Ceftolozane/tazobactam is approved for hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia at double the dose (i.e. 2 g/1 g) recommended for other indications. We evaluated the bronchopulmonary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of this 3 g ceftolozane/tazobactam regimen in ventilated pneumonia patients. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicentre, Phase 1 trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02387372). Mechanically ventilated patients with proven/suspected pneumonia received four to six doses of 3 g of ceftolozane/tazobactam (adjusted for renal function) q8h. Serial plasma samples were collected after the first and last doses. One bronchoalveolar lavage sample per patient was collected at 1, 2, 4, 6 or 8 h after the last dose and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) drug concentrations were determined. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by non-compartmental analysis and pharmacodynamic analyses were conducted to graphically evaluate achievement of target exposures (plasma and ELF ceftolozane concentrations >4 mg/L and tazobactam concentrations >1 mg/L; target in plasma: ≥30% and ≥20% of the dosing interval, respectively). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received four to six doses of study drug; 22 were included in the ELF analyses. Ceftolozane and tazobactam Tmax (6 and 2 h, respectively) were delayed in ELF compared with plasma (1 h). Lung penetration, expressed as the ratio of mean drug exposure (AUC) in ELF to plasma, was 50% (ceftolozane) and 62% (tazobactam). Mean ceftolozane and tazobactam ELF concentrations remained >4 mg/L and >1 mg/L, respectively, for 100% of the dosing interval. There were no deaths or adverse event-related study discontinuations. CONCLUSIONS: In ventilated pneumonia patients, 3 g of ceftolozane/tazobactam q8h yielded ELF exposures considered adequate to cover ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible respiratory pathogens.

Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Population Pharmacokinetics and Dose Selection for Further Clinical Evaluation in Pediatric Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract or Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam, a combination of the novel antipseudomonal cephalosporin ceftolozane and the well-established extended-spectrum ß-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam, is approved for treating complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) in adults. To determine doses likely to be safe and efficacious in phase 2 pediatric trials for the same indications, single-dose ceftolozane-tazobactam plasma pharmacokinetic data from a recently completed phase 1 trial in pediatric patients (birth to <18 years old) with proven/suspected Gram-negative bacterial infections, along with pharmacokinetic data from 12 adult studies, were integrated into a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) analysis. Two-compartment linear models with first-order elimination described the concentration-time profiles of ceftolozane and tazobactam in pediatric patients well. Renal function and body weight were identified to be significant predictors of ceftolozane-tazobactam pharmacokinetics. Renal function, as measured by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), significantly affected the clearance of both ceftolozane and tazobactam. Body weight significantly affected clearance and the distribution volume, also of both ceftolozane and tazobactam. Patients with infections had a 32.3% lower tazobactam clearance than healthy volunteers. Using the final popPK models, simulations of various dosing regimens were conducted to assess each regimen's plasma exposure and the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment. Based on these simulations, the following doses are recommended for further clinical evaluation in phase 2 pediatric trials for cUTI and cIAI (in patients with an eGFR of ≥50 ml/min/1.73 m2 only): for children ≥12 years old, 1.5 g ceftolozane-tazobactam (1 g ceftolozane with 0.5 g tazobactam), and for neonates/very young infants, infants, and children <12 years old, 20/10 mg/kg of body weight ceftolozane-tazobactam, both via a 1-h intravenous infusion every 8 h.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Single Intravenous Doses of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Children With Proven or Suspected Gram-Negative Infection.

BACKGROUND: Drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are a growing threat to children; thus new antibiotics are needed to treat infections caused by these pathogens. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is active against many Gram-negative pathogens and is approved for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in adults, but has not been evaluated in children. METHODS: This phase 1, noncomparative, open-label, multicenter study characterized the pharmacokinetics (by noncompartmental analysis), safety, and tolerability of single intravenous doses of ceftolozane/tazobactam in pediatric patients (birth [7 days postnatal] to < 18 years of age) with proven/suspected Gram-negative infection or receiving perioperative prophylaxis (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02266706). Patients were enrolled into 1 of 6 age groups to receive a single, age-based ceftolozane/tazobactam dose, with timed blood sample collection for determining plasma concentrations of ceftolozane and tazobactam. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received study drug; 34 were included in the pharmacokinetic population. Ceftolozane and tazobactam pharmacokinetic parameters were generally comparable for patients 3 months to < 18 years of age. Patients from birth (7 days postnatal) to < 3 months of age had lower clearance than older children, likely due to the immature renal function of these young infants. No deaths, study drug-related serious adverse events, or clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were observed after administration of ceftolozane/tazobactam. CONCLUSIONS: The doses evaluated in this study yielded ceftolozane/tazobactam exposure levels generally comparable with those in adults. Single doses of ceftolozane/tazobactam were well-tolerated, and no safety concerns were identified. These data informed pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models to derive pediatric dose recommendations for phase 2 ceftolozane/tazobactam clinical trials.

Primary Outcomes From a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Trial of Surotomycin in Subjects With Clostridium difficile Infection.

BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is increasing, available CDI treatment options are limited in terms of sustained response after treatment. This phase 3 trial assessed the efficacy and safety of surotomycin, a novel bactericidal cyclic lipopeptide, versus oral vancomycin in subjects with CDI. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter, international trial, subjects with CDI confirmed by a positive toxin result were randomized to receive surotomycin (250 mg twice daily) or vancomycin (125 mg 4 times daily) orally for 10 days. The primary endpoints were clinical response at end of treatment and evaluation of surotomycin safety. The key secondary endpoints were clinical response over time and sustained clinical response through a 30- to 40-day follow-up period. Clostridium difficile infection recurrence during follow-up and time to diarrhea resolution were also analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 570 subjects were randomized and had confirmed CDI; 290 subjects received surotomycin and 280 subjects received vancomycin. Surotomycin clinical cure rates at end of treatment (surotomycin/vancomycin: 79.0%/83.6%; difference of -4.6%; 95% confidence interval, -11.0 to 1.9]), clinical response over time (stratified log-rank test, P = .832), and sustained clinical response at end of trial (Day 40-50) (60.6%/61.4%; difference of -0.8%; 95% CI, -8.8 to 7.1) in the microbiological modified intent to treat population did not meet noninferiority or superiority criteria versus vancomycin. Both treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Surotomycin failed to meet the criteria for noninferiority versus vancomycin for the primary and key secondary endpoints in this trial.

Effects of Tedizolid Phosphate on Survival Outcomes and Suppression of Production of Staphylococcal Toxins in a Rabbit Model of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Necrotizing Pneumonia.

The protective efficacy of tedizolid phosphate, a novel oxazolidinone that potently inhibits bacterial protein synthesis, was compared to those of linezolid, vancomycin, and saline in a rabbit model of Staphylococcus aureus necrotizing pneumonia. Tedizolid phosphate was administered to rabbits at 6 mg/kg of body weight intravenously twice daily, which yielded values of the 24-h area under the concentration-time curve approximating those found in humans. The overall survival rate was 83% for rabbits treated with 6 mg/kg tedizolid phosphate twice daily and 83% for those treated with 50 mg/kg linezolid thrice daily (P = 0.66 by the log-rank test versus the results obtained with tedizolid phosphate). These survival rates were significantly greater than the survival rates of 17% for rabbits treated with 30 mg/kg vancomycin twice daily (P = 0.003) and 17% for rabbits treated with saline (P = 0.002). The bacterial count in the lungs of rabbits treated with tedizolid phosphate was significantly decreased compared to that in the lungs of rabbits treated with saline, although it was not significantly different from that in the lungs of rabbits treated with vancomycin or linezolid. The in vivo bacterial production of alpha-toxin and Panton-Valentine leukocidin, two key S. aureus-secreted toxins that play critical roles in the pathogenesis of necrotizing pneumonia, in the lungs of rabbits treated with tedizolid phosphate and linezolid was significantly inhibited compared to that in the lungs of rabbits treated with vancomycin or saline. Taken together, these results indicate that tedizolid phosphate is superior to vancomycin for the treatment of S. aureus necrotizing pneumonia because it inhibits the bacterial production of lung-damaging toxins at the site of infection.

Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Darunavir/Ritonavir With and Without Etravirine in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available for once-daily (QD) darunavir (DRV)/ritonavir (r) in the pediatric population. Coadministration of etravirine (ETR) may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of DRV. We evaluated the PK interactions between DRV/r (QD) and ETR QD or twice-daily (BID) in children, adolescents, and young adults. METHODS: Human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects 9 to < 24 years old on optimized background therapy including DRV/r 800/100 mg QD alone or combined with ETR 200 mg BID or ETR 400 mg QD were enrolled. Protocol-defined target drug exposure ranges based on adult data were used to assess the adequacy of each regimen. Intensive 24-hour blood sampling was performed, and PK parameters were determined using noncompartmental analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-one subjects (14 males) completed the study; 16 received DRV/r QD alone (group 1), 6 received DRV/r plus ETR BID (group 2A), and 9 received DRV/r plus ETR QD (group 2B). The geometric mean (90% confidence interval [CI] geometric mean) for DRV area under the curve at 24 hours (AUC24) was 57.9 (49.6-67.6), 74.9 (44.4-126.5), and 66.4 (50.8-86.9) mg × h/L for patients in groups 1, 2A, and 2B, respectively. The increased DRV exposure when coadministered with ETR was not statistically significant. The geometric mean (90% CI geometric mean) of ETR AUC24 was 8.6 (4.4-16.8) and 11.9 (7.5-18.9) mg × h/L for groups 2A and 2B, respectively, with comparable C24. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that DRV/r QD with ETR 400 mg QD or 200 mg BID is appropriate and support further evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the once-daily regimen in older children, adolescents, and young adults.

Perinatal pharmacokinetics of azithromycin for cesarean prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: Postpartum infections are polymicrobial and typically include Ureaplasma, an intracellular microbe that is treated by macrolides such as azithromycin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perinatal pharmacokinetics of azithromycin after a single preincision dose before cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty women who underwent scheduled cesarean delivery were assigned randomly to receive 500 mg of intravenous azithromycin that was initiated 15, 30, or 60 minutes before incision and infused over 1 hour. Serial maternal plasma samples were drawn from the end of infusion up to 8 hours after the infusion. Samples of amniotic fluid, umbilical cord blood, placenta, myometrium, and adipose tissue were collected intraoperatively. Breast milk samples were collected 12-48 hours after the infusion in 8 women who were breastfeeding. Azithromycin was quantified with high performance liquid chromatography separation coupled with tandem mass spectrometry detection. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated with the use of noncompartmental analysis and compartmental modeling and simulations. RESULTS: The maximum maternal plasma concentration was reached within 1 hour and exceeded the in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC50) of 250 ng/mL of Ureaplasma spp in all 30 patients. The concentrations were sustained with a half-life of 6.7 hours. The median concentration of azithromycin in adipose tissue was 102 ng/g, which was below the MIC50. The median concentration in myometrium was 402 ng/g, which exceeded the MIC50. Azithromycin was detectable in both the umbilical cord plasma and amniotic fluid after the single preoperative dose. Azithromycin concentrations in breast milk were high and were sustained up to 48 hours after the single dose. Simulations demonstrated accumulation in breast milk after multiple doses. CONCLUSION: A single dose of azithromycin achieves effective plasma and tissue concentrations and is transported rapidly across the placenta. The tissue concentrations that are achieved in the myometrium exceed the MIC50 for Ureaplasma spp.

Pharmacokinetic enhancers in HIV therapeutics.

Maximal and durable viral load suppression is one of the most important goals of HIV therapy and is directly related to adequate drug exposure. Protease inhibitors (PIs), an important component of the antiretroviral armada, were historically associated with poor oral bioavailability and high pill burden. However, because the PIs are metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A enzymes, intentional inhibition of these enzymes leads to higher drug exposure, lower pill burden, and therefore simplified dosing schedules with this class of drug. This is the basis of pharmacokinetic enhancement. In HIV therapy, two pharmacokinetic enhancers or boosting agents are used: ritonavir and cobicistat. Both agents inhibit CYP3A4, with cobicistat being a more specific CYP inhibitor than ritonavir. Unlike ritonavir, cobicistat does not have antiretroviral activity. Cobicistat has been evaluated in clinical trials and was recently approved in the USA as a fixed-dose combination with the integrase inhibitor, elvitegravir and two nucleos(t)ide analogs. Additional studies are examining cobicistat in fixed-dose combinations with various PIs. In this review, we summarize current knowledge of these agents and clinically relevant drug regimens and ongoing trials. Studies with elvitegravir and the novel PI TMC319011 are also discussed.

Transplacental transfer of Azithromycin and its use for eradicating intra-amniotic ureaplasma infection in a primate model.

BACKGROUND: Our goals were to describe azithromycin (AZI) pharmacokinetics in maternal plasma (MP), fetal plasma (FP), and amniotic fluid (AF) following intra-amniotic infection (IAI) with Ureaplasma in pregnant rhesus monkeys and to explore concentration-response relationships. METHODS: Following intra-amniotic inoculation of Ureaplasma parvum, rhesus monkeys received AZI (12.5 mg/kg every 12 hours intravenously for 10 days; n = 10). Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling of MP, FP, and AF was scheduled following the first (ie, single) dose and the last (ie, multiple) dose. Noncompartmental and pharmacokinetic modeling methods were used. RESULTS: The AF area under the concentration-time curve at 12 hours was 0.22 µg×h/mL following a single dose and 6.3 µg×h/mL at day 10. MP and AF accumulation indices were 8.4 and 19, respectively. AZI AF half-life following the single dose and multiple dose were 156 and 129 hours, respectively. The median MP:FP ratio in concomitantly drawn samples was 3.2 (range, 1.3-9.6; n = 9). Eradication of U. parvum occurred at 6.6 days, with a 95% effective concentration (EC95) of 39 ng/mL for the maximum AZI AF concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that a maternal multiple-dose AZI regimen is effective in eradicating U. parvum IAI by virtue of intra-amniotic accumulation and suggests that antenatal therapy has the potential to mitigate complications associated with U. parvum infection in pregnancy, such as preterm labor and fetal sequelae.

Raltegravir for HIV-1 infected children and adolescents: efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics.

Raltegravir was the first HIV integrase strand-transfer inhibitor to be approved by the US FDA, in October 2007, for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in combination with other antiretroviral agents. Raltegravir can be used in treatment-naïve and -experienced patients, as well as for the treatment of multidrug-resistant infection. Raltegravir exists in two formulations: a film-coated tablet administered orally at 400 mg twice daily, and a chewable tablet administered orally at 300 mg twice daily. In 2011, raltegravir was also approved for the treatment of children and adolescents, ages 2-18 years. For adolescents (ages 12-18 years), the recommended dose is 400 mg twice daily (film-coated tablet). If children (ages 6-12 years) weigh at least 25 kg, the film-coated tablet is recommended at 400 mg twice daily. Otherwise, patients receive the chewable tablet according to weight-based dosing at approximately 6 mg/kg/dose. Studies are ongoing for children ages 4 weeks to 2 years, and preliminary efficacy and safety data are promising. This article reviews current studies on the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of raltegravir in the pediatric population and the challenges of treating HIV in children and adolescents.