Associations of loneliness and social isolation with physical and mental health among adolescents and young adults.

AIMS: The present study investigates whether loneliness and social isolation are associated with poor physical and mental health among adolescents and young adults, and whether age and gender play a role in the associations of loneliness and social isolation with mental and physical health. METHODS: This study used cross-sectional self-report data from the 2017 Danish Health and Morbidity Surveys titled 'How are you?' (N = 19,890, M = 22.6 years). RESULTS: Logistic regression analyses showed that loneliness and social isolation were independently associated with poor physical and mental health. Loneliness was associated with increased odds of asthma, migraine, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, slipped disc/back pain, tinnitus, long-term mental illness, depressive symptomatology, anxiety symptomatology and alcohol problems. Social isolation was associated with decreased odds of having migraine, osteoarthritis and alcohol problems, and an increased risk of long-term mental illness and depressive symptomatology. Small age and gender differences were detected. CONCLUSIONS: In adolescents and young adults, loneliness and social isolation were associated with poor mental health and loneliness with poor physical health. These findings highlight the need for targeted prevention and intervention initiatives to alleviate loneliness and social isolation.

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes in people with psychiatric disorders: an umbrella review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological studies have investigated the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in individuals with a psychiatric disorder. In an umbrella review, we aim to systematically summarize existing systematic reviews examining the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in people with a psychiatric disorder. When information is available in the identified systematic reviews, comparisons with control groups without a psychiatric disorder will be made. Furthermore, we aim to assess the quality of the included systematic reviews. METHODS: The umbrella review will be based on a comprehensive systematic search of systematic reviews of observational (cross-sectional or longitudinal) studies investigating the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in people with a psychiatric disorder. Four electronic databases (Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) will be searched. Retrieved papers will be screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. Furthermore, the reference lists of all included publications will be screened. Data will be extracted by using an a priori developed data extraction form and two independent reviewers will assess the risk of bias in the included systematic reviews using with the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) tool. A narrative data-synthesis and a subsequent meta-analysis based on the primary studies will be made. DISCUSSION: For each psychiatric disorder, the data regarding the prevalence of type 2 diabetes will be summarized and discussed. When possible, comparisons with control groups will be reported and discussed. Finally, future implications and recommendations for clinical care will be presented. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This protocol was submitted for registration with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on December 9, 2019 (registration number: pending).

Perceived stress and risk of any osteoporotic fracture.

UNLABELLED: Perceived stress is associated with several adverse health outcomes; however, little is known about the impact of stress on fracture risk. In this population-based cohort study, persons with high perceived stress have an increased 5-year risk of any osteoporotic fracture, in particular hip fracture. INTRODUCTION: We conducted a population-based cohort study in Denmark to examine the association between perceived stress and risk of subsequent osteoporotic fracture. METHODS: A 2006 population-based health survey in the Central Danish Region (with 1.25 million inhabitants) was used to identify 7943 persons who were 55 years or older on the survey date and completed the Perceived Stress Scale. Individuals were categorized into two groups: high level of stress and low level of stress (including no stress). We obtained information on all osteoporotic fractures through linkage to the Danish National Registry of Patients. We used Cox regression to compute hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) adjusted for a number of lifestyle factors, socioeconomic data, perceived general health, and prescription history, comparing high- and low-stress persons. RESULTS: A total of 1799 persons (22.6 %) reported high level of perceived stress, whereas 6144 (77.4 %) reported low level or no stress. The 5-year risk of any osteoporotic fracture was 7.4 and 5.4 % in persons with high and low perceived stress, respectively, corresponding to adjusted HR of 1.37 (CI 1.00-1.89). The adjusted HR for hip fracture within 5 years associated with high perceived stress was 1.68 (CI 1.04-2.72). The associations weakened with increasing follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with high perceived stress have an increased risk of any osteoporotic fracture, in particular risk of hip fracture within 5 years of stress assessment even after adjusting for differences in lifestyle, comorbidities, osteoporosis presence, medication use, and socioeconomic status at the time of stress level evaluation. The association attenuated after longer follow-up time.