Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 6(3): 282-9, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21119254

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The present study identifies the prognostic factors influencing oral cancers in a large cohort of patients treated at a single institute. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an audit of 1180 patients treated from 1990 to 2004 in the service setting with prospective data collection. Patients were treated with radical radiotherapy or were planned for surgery and post operative radiotherapy (PORT). None of the patients received postoperative concurrent chemoradiation. For analysis, patients were divided into Group 1 and Group 2 based on the oral cavity subsite. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort, 810 patients had tumors of the Gingivo-alveolo-buccal complex, lip and hard palate (Group 1) and 370 patients had primaries in tongue and floor of mouth (Group 2). Three year locoregional control for the entire cohort was 58%. The three year local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC) and disease free survival (DFS) for PORT group were 74%, 65% and 60%, respectively, with pathological nodal status, perinodal extension and cut margin status showing statistical significance (P <0.001). In the definitive radiotherapy group, the three year LC, LRC and DFS were 34%, 31% and 30%, respectively, with age, T stage, nodal status and stage being significant. Group 1 patients showed significantly better LC, LRC and DFS than Group 2 patients for the entire cohort. CONCLUSION: The results indicate superior outcomes with PORT particularly in advanced stages of oral cancer and inferior outcomes in tongue and floor of mouth subsites. There is scope for improving outcomes by adopting treatment intensification strategies.


Subject(s)
Mouth Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Young Adult
2.
J Laryngol Otol ; 124(7): 739-43, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20156370

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To study the outcome of patients with sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma treated at a single institution. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 22 patients with histopathologically proven sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma diagnosed during the period 1993-2007. Treatment was completed in 16 patients. RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent surgery (six received craniofacial resection, four open surgery and four endoscopic resection); this was followed by radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy in 11 patients. Two patients received chemoradiation as the definitive treatment. At median follow up in surviving patients of 34 months (range one to 180 months), only five were controlled. Disease recurred in 11 patients, with a median time to recurrence of seven months. The two-year disease-free survival rate and the overall survival rate were 28 and 46 per cent, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma appears to be an aggressive disease, with the majority of patients suffering locoregional failure. Multimodality treatment, in the form of a combination of surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy, appears to be the optimal approach.


Subject(s)
Carcinosarcoma/therapy , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/therapy , Teratoma/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ; 6(3): 405-17, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16503857

ABSTRACT

Head and neck cancer management has undergone several paradigm shifts for several relevant reasons. From the dismal experience with the use of radiotherapy as the sole modality in the treatment of this group of patients with advanced disease, radiotherapy has been evaluated as an adjuvant for the same group of patients who had undergone successful surgery. Although there is no level 1 evidence to support postoperative adjuvant radiation, several studies have demonstrated that adjuvant radiotherapy reduces the local failures and, thereby, improves survival. Predictors of recurrence after surgical resection are: positive margins of resection; extranodal spread in involved nodes; perineural invasion; and presence of two or more involved regional lymph nodes. Realization of the advantages of a combination of chemotherapy with radiotherapy has had a major impact on the management of these cancers. There is emerging evidence for the use of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the group with high-risk features. Multiple organ conservation strategies in the management of locally advanced head and neck cancers have evolved over the years. However, the meta-analyses of impact of chemotherapy in various settings reveal that concomitant chemoradiotherapy is superior to any of the other regimens. Increasing use of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography scan images has resulted in better visualization of target volumes and critical structures. Delineation of these structures is of paramount importance and has resulted in a profound change in conformal treatment planning. Better understanding of the physical aspects of delivery of radiotherapy and the advent of modern treatment planning systems have led to the development of conformal techniques. Although the benefit of these techniques on survival have yet to be demonstrated, there is evidence to suggest that they reduce treatment-related toxicities significantly and facilitate dose escalation. Increased knowledge of radiobiology has led to the development of various altered fractionation regimens in the management of locally advanced head and neck cancers. Discovery of cell-cycle kinetics and signal transduction pathways has led to the unearthing of several potential targets for targeted therapy. The epidermal growth factor receptor gene has emerged as the most promising target. The role of biological radiation response modifiers is evolving. All of these approaches to improve the therapeutic gain would be incomplete without evaluating their effect on the quality of life of these patients.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cell Cycle , Combined Modality Therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Kinetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prognosis , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Risk Factors , Signal Transduction , Survival
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...