ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Treatment guidelines for hepatoblastoma discourage nonanatomic liver resections. However, the evidence for this is inadequate and comes from a study performed almost two decades ago which additionally contained inherent limitations. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and oncologic outcomes of nonanatomic resections (NAR) performed in diligently selected patients and compare the results with anatomic resections (AR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients who underwent liver resections for hepatoblastoma between January 2008 and July 2019 were reviewed. Feasibility of NAR was based on postchemotherapy relations to vessels, site of the lesion, and possibility of achieving negative resection margins. RESULTS: AR was performed in 95 patients and 25 had NAR. The NAR cohort had similar International Childhood Liver Tumors Strategy Group (SIOPEL) risk group distribution. Blood loss and operative times were lower in patients undergoing NAR. No differences were noted between the two groups concerning postoperative morbidity and hospitalization. There were no pathologic positive margins or local recurrences in the NAR patients. Relapse free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was similar in the two groups (p = 0.54 and 0.96, respectively). Subgroup analysis of only posttreatment extent of tumor (POSTTEXT) I and II patients also showed no difference in RFS or OS for the two groups with a persistent significant difference in operative times and blood loss. CONCLUSION: NAR is feasible with clear margins in carefully selected patients. It is not associated with more complications and outcomes are not inferior to AR. NAR is associated with lesser blood loss and operative time.
Subject(s)
Hepatectomy/methods , Hepatoblastoma/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Patient Selection , Adolescent , Blood Loss, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Databases, Factual , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hepatoblastoma/mortality , Hepatoblastoma/pathology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Margins of Excision , Operative Time , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Benign liver tumors in children are rare and data regarding the surgical outcomes are deficient. We reviewed our experience in the management of these tumors particularly the extent, safety, and effectiveness of surgical resection. METHODS: Between March 2005 and March 2014, 10/90 liver resections were performed for benign liver tumors. Three other patients received conservative treatment. Demographic characteristics, operative management, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 12 months. The distribution of pathology was infantile hepatic hemangioendothelioma/hemangioma (n = 7), mesenchymal hamartoma (n = 4), adenoma (n = 1) and focal nodular hyperplasia (n = 1). Median tumor size was 12.25 cm (range 3.5-21 cm) with a median tumor volume of 576.64 cm(3) (range 13.9-1822.64 cm(3)). Non-anatomic resection was performed in 6/10 patients and the median blood loss was 100 ml (range 10-850 ml). Median length of hospital stay was 7 days (range 5-9 days). There were no mortality, none of the patients had a local recurrence, and all are alive at a median follow-up of 33 months. CONCLUSIONS: Two-third patients with benign liver tumors were managed with surgical excision, which comprised 11% of our resectional practice. Non-anatomical resection whenever feasible can be performed safely and does not compromise the oncological outcomes.
