ABSTRACT
The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol affected traditional cardiac surgery processes and COVID-19 is expected to accelerate its scalability. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of an ERAS-based protocol on the length of hospital stay after cardiac surgery. From January 2019 to June 2020, 664 patients underwent consecutive cardiac surgery at a Latin American center. Here, 46 patients were prepared for a rapid recovery through a multidisciplinary institutional protocol based on the ERAS concept, the "TotalCor protocol". After the propensity score matching, 46 patients from the entire population were adjusted for 12 variables. Patients operated on the TotalCor protocol had reduced intensive care unit time (P < 0.025), postoperative stay (P ≤ 0.001) and length of hospital stay (P ≤ 0.001). In addition, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of complications and death between the two groups. Of the 10-central metrics of TotalCor protocol, 6 had > 70% adherences. In conclusion, the TotalCor protocol was safe and effective for a 3-day discharge after cardiac surgery. Postoperative atrial fibrillation and renal failure were predictors of postoperative stay > 5 days.
Subject(s)
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Length of Stay , Patient Discharge , Patient Safety , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Patient Care Team , Postoperative Complications , Propensity ScoreABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Cardiac surgeries are sometimes followed by significant blood loss, and blood transfusions may be necessary. However, indiscriminant use of blood components can result in detrimental effects for the patient. We evaluated the short-term effects of implementation of a protocol for the rational use of blood products in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery. METHODS: Between April and June 2011, an institutional protocol was implemented in a private hospital specializing in cardiology to encourage rational use of blood products, with the consent and collaboration of seven cardiac surgery teams. We collected clinical and demographic data on the patients. The use of blood products and clinical outcomes were analyzed during hospital stay before and after protocol implementation. The protocol consisted of an institutional campaign with an educational intervention to surgical and anesthesiology teams; the goal was to tailor blood transfusion practice according to clinical goals (anemia with hemodynamic changes and significant ventricular dysfunction) and to make routine the prescription of ε-aminocaproic acid intraoperatively, which is recommended by international guidelines based on scientific evidence. RESULTS: After three months of protocol implementation, the use of ε-aminocaproic acid increased from 31% to 100%. A total of 67% of surgeries before protocol implementation required any blood transfusion, compared with 40% that required any blood transfusion after protocol implementation in subsequent months of the same year (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes assessed before and after implementation of the protocol. CONCLUSION: The rational use of blood products associated with infusion of ε-aminocaproic acid has the potential to reduce the number of blood transfusions in perioperative of cardiac surgeries, but it can affect the risk of complications.
Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Aminocaproic Acid/administration & dosage , Antifibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Clinical Protocols , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Cirurgias cardíacas são, por vezes, acompanhadas de perdas sanguíneas significativas, e transfusões de sangue podem ser necessárias. No entanto, o uso indiscriminado de hemoderivados pode resultar em efeitos danosos para o paciente. Neste estudo, avaliamos os efeitos imediatos da implantação de um protocolo para o uso racional de hemoderivados no perioperatório de cirurgias de revascularização miocárdica. MÉTODOS: Entre os meses de abril e junho de 2011, foi implementado um protocolo institucional em um hospital privado especializado em cardiologia com a anuência e a colaboração de sete equipes de cirurgia cardíaca, visando ao uso racional de hemoderivados. Foram verificados dados clínicos e demográficos dos pacientes, e avaliados o uso de hemoderivados e os desfechos clínicos no período intra-hospitalar, antes e após a implantação do protocolo. O protocolo consistiu em uma campanha institucional junto às equipes cirúrgicas, de anestesiologia e intensivistas, para difundir a prática do uso de hemoderivados com base em critérios clínicos objetivos (anemia com repercussões hemodinâmicas e disfunção ventricular significativa), bem como tornar rotineira a prescrição de ácido epsilon-aminocaproico no intraoperatório, que é prática recomendada por diretrizes internacionais baseadas em evidência científica. RESULTADOS: Após os 3 meses de implantação do protocolo, houve aumento do uso de ácido epsilon-aminocaproico de 31% para 100%. Antes da implantação do protocolo, 67% das cirurgias utilizaram alguma transfusão sanguínea; após a implantação, 40% das cirurgias necessitaram de alguma transfusão sanguínea nos meses subsequentes do mesmo ano (p<0,001). Não houve diferença significativa nos desfechos clínicos avaliados antes e após implantação do protocolo. CONCLUSÃO: O uso racional de hemoderivados, associado à infusão do ácido epsilon-aminocaproico, tem o potencial de reduzir o número de hemotransfusões no perioperatório de cirurgias cardíacas...
OBJECTIVE: Cardiac surgeries are sometimes followed by significant blood loss, and blood transfusions may be necessary. However, indiscriminant use of blood components can result in detrimental effects for the patient. We evaluated the short-term effects of implementation of a protocol for the rational use of blood products in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery. METHODS: Between April and June 2011, an institutional protocol was implemented in a private hospital specializing in cardiology to encourage rational use of blood products, with the consent and collaboration of seven cardiac surgery teams. We collected clinical and demographic data on the patients. The use of blood products and clinical outcomes were analyzed during hospital stay before and after protocol implementation. The protocol consisted of an institutional campaign with an educational intervention to surgical and anesthesiology teams; the goal was to tailor blood transfusion practice according to clinical goals (anemia with hemodynamic changes and significant ventricular dysfunction) and to make routine the prescription of å-aminocaproic acid intraoperatively, which is recommended by international guidelines based on scientific evidence. RESULTS: After three months of protocol implementation, the use of å-aminocaproic acid increased from 31% to 100%. A total of 67% of surgeries before protocol implementation required any blood transfusion, compared with 40% that required any blood transfusion after protocol implementation in subsequent months of the same year (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes assessed before and after implementation of the protocol. CONCLUSION: The rational use of blood products associated with infusion of å-aminocaproic acid has the potential to reduce the number of blood transfusions in perioperative of cardiac surgeries, but it can affect the risk of complications.
