ABSTRACT
This study compared the segregation patterns of human papillomavirus (HPV) in genital and nongenital warts in prepubertal children and adults. HPV 2 was detected in most nongenital warts in children and adults, whereas neither HPV 6 or 11 was detected at nongenital sites in either group with the use of in situ or Southern blot hybridization analyses. Of nine genital tract lesions in children. HPV 2 was detected in two and HPV 6 or 11 in six. More than 90% of cases of regional tract condylomata in adults contained HPV 6 or 11. HPV 2 was not detected in any of 99 genital tract lesions in adults. It is concluded that HPV 6/11 cannot proliferate at nongenital cutaneous sites and HPV 2 can proliferate in the genital tract of children but not adults. Thus, the detection of HPV 6 or 11 in a genital wart in a child implies, assuming cutaneous transmission, infection from a genital site, whereas the detection of HPV 2 presumes nongenital transmission.
Subject(s)
Condylomata Acuminata/microbiology , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Warts/microbiology , Adult , Blotting, Southern , Child , Child, Preschool , Condylomata Acuminata/chemistry , DNA Probes , DNA, Viral/analysis , DNA, Viral/genetics , Female , Genitalia, Female/chemistry , Genitalia, Female/microbiology , Genitalia, Male/chemistry , Genitalia, Male/microbiology , Humans , Infant , Male , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Skin/chemistry , Skin/microbiologyABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to analyze penile lesions that lacked the histological features of condylomata for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA. Most of these lesions were detected in men whose partners had an HPV-related lesion. Sequences homologous to HPV DNA were detected in 12 of 84 (14%) lesions using in situ hybridization analysis; nine of these lesions contained HPV 6 or 11. HPV DNA was found in 25 of 26 (96%) penile condylomata, all but two of which contained HPV 6 or 11. Using the highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we also detected HPV DNA in four of 20 (20%) of the penile lesions that lacked the histological features of condylomata negative for HPV by in situ analysis. Most of the lesions that were identifiable only after the application of an acetic acid solution were HPV negative when tested with either technique. We conclude that HPV DNA can be found in penile biopsy specimens that do not demonstrate the unequivocal histological features of condylomata but that the detection rate is much lower than for condylomata even when analyzing tissues in men at high risk for HPV-related lesions by PCR. This study underscores the need for caution when interpreting such tissues and the usefulness of in situ analysis for detecting assumed viral proliferation in noncondylomatous lesions.
Subject(s)
Condylomata Acuminata/genetics , DNA, Neoplasm/analysis , DNA, Viral/analysis , Penile Neoplasms/genetics , Tumor Virus Infections/genetics , Base Sequence , Biopsy , Condylomata Acuminata/pathology , DNA Probes , Humans , Male , Molecular Sequence Data , Nucleic Acid Hybridization , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Penile Neoplasms/pathology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid , Tumor Virus Infections/pathologyABSTRACT
Ovarian stroma contains cells with the ultrastructural features of smooth-muscle cells. The purpose of this study was to analyze normal ovaries, ovarian stromal tumors (fibroma/thecomata and granulosa cell tumors), and ovarian leiomyomata for desmin reactivity. Groups of ovarian stromal cells that expressed desmin were noted in six of six normal ovaries. Desmin was also detected in two of six fibroma/thecomata and two of two ovarian leiomyomata. The number of tumor cells with detectable desmin was much greater in the leiomyomata. Desmin was not detected in any of six granulosa cell tumors. We conclude that stromal cells with an immunohistochemical feature of smooth-muscle cells are routinely found in normal ovaries. This study demonstrates the usefulness of immunohistochemistry in corroborating the diagnosis of ovarian leiomyomata, although desmin positivity per se is not diagnostic of ovarian leiomyomata, and also raises the possibility that some ovarian leiomyomata may be derived from stromal cells.
