Bone health evaluation in a veteran population: a need for the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX).

BACKGROUND: Approximately 2 million men in the United States have osteoporosis, but men are seldom evaluated or treated to prevent fracture. In the expanding veteran population, the fracture risk assessment tool, FRAX, could help reduce fracture risk. However, it is unknown how many veterans would meet the FRAX treatment threshold. OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of untreated veterans who should be considered for osteoporosis treatment according to the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) among a randomly selected sample of older veterans receiving care at one Veterans Hospital and to determine the proportion of veterans in the sample who had received treatment. METHODS: A retrospective review of 150 randomly selected charts from male veterans at least 70 years of age and female veterans at least 65 years of age receiving primary care at the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, between January 1, 2007, and October 1, 2010. This study focused on men, but women were included per institutional review board policy. RESULTS: Charts from 147 men and 3 women were reviewed; 25 men had received osteoporosis treatment. Of 122 untreated men, 74 (61%) met FRAX treatment criteria, including 14 who had fractured. Although bone density testing is recommended by the National Osteoporosis Foundation for men at least 70 years old, only 21 (17%) untreated men had been tested. CONCLUSIONS: Most veterans who met FRAX criteria were not treated, including some who had had fractures. The VA should consider recommending FRAX to identify veterans at high risk for fracture.

Patient assessment in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis.

Assessment of the patient with osteoporosis includes history and physical examination, laboratory testing, and imaging studies. Information gathered during this assessment assists clinicians in targeting strategies to prevent fractures. The medical history should contain items such as personal and family history of fractures, lifestyle, intake of substances such as vitamin D, calcium, corticosteroids, and other medications. The physical examination can reveal relevant information such as height loss and risk of falls. Bone mineral density (BMD), most commonly determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, best predicts fracture risk in patients without previous fracture. BMD testing is most efficient in women over 65 years old but is also helpful for men and women with risk factors. Serial BMD tests can identify individuals losing bone mass, but clinicians should be aware of what constitutes a significant change. Laboratory testing can detect other risk factors and can provide clues to etiology. Selection of laboratory tests should be individualized, as there is no consensus regarding which tests are optimal. Biochemical markers of bone turnover have a potential role in fracture risk assessment and in gauging response to therapy, but are not widely used at present. Clinicians should be aware of problems with vitamin D measurement, including seasonal variation, variability among laboratories, and the desirable therapeutic range. Careful assessment of the osteoporotic patient is essential in developing a comprehensive plan that reduces fracture risk and improves quality of life.

Chronic metoclopramide therapy for diabetic gastroparesis.

OBJECTIVE: To review the safety and efficacy of chronic metoclopramide for diabetic gastroparesis. DATA SOURCES: Medical literature was accessed through MEDLINE (1965 to October 2002) and PubMed (1965 to October 2002). Key search terms included metoclopramide; diabetic gastroparesis; and dyskinesia, drug induced. DATA SYNTHESIS: Metoclopramide is often used for diabetic gastroparesis, despite the risk of tardive dyskinesia. Published information is limited regarding long-term efficacy and toxicity of metoclopramide. The literature was assessed concerning these topics. CONCLUSIONS: Limited data do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude whether metoclopramide is efficacious for chronic use. Routine monitoring may mitigate the risk associated with metoclopramide therapy.

Acceptability of pharmacy-based bone density measurement by women and primary healthcare providers.

OBJECTIVES: To assess women's information sources regarding, and monetary value placed on, pharmacy-based bone density screening. In addition, we evaluated clinicians' response to peripheral bone mass measurements. DESIGN: We recruited 197 women 50 years of age or older in four rural Midwestern community pharmacies. Each woman completed a questionnaire and underwent calcaneal bone density testing. Results were sent to participants' primary care providers. These providers, and others practicing within a 50-mile radius, were surveyed anonymously to evaluate usefulness of bone density data provided by this program or pharmacy-based osteoporosis screening in general. In addition, clinicians were asked how they would manage a woman with a calcaneal T-score of -1.3. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of participants [95% CI, 49%-63%] became interested in screening through the media, and only 6% (CI, 3%-9%) became interested through contact with their primary care provider. Women were willing to pay a median of $25 for screening. Of 18 responding clinicians with patients in this study, 72% (CI, 47%-90%) found the results useful. Of the 67 responding clinicians, 51% (CI, 39%-63%) supported pharmacy-based bone mass measurement. For a case scenario of a woman with a calcaneal T-score of -1.3, 57% (CI, 46%-68%) of clinicians indicated that they would have ordered central dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and 20% (CI, 11%-29%) would have prescribed antiresorptive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that (1) women are an important force in obtaining bone density testing outside the clinic setting, both by self-education and willingness to pay, and (2) primary care clinicians receiving such results find them useful and indicate willingness to use them in decision-making.