Complications of prosthesis versus trapeziectomy in trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Thumb osteoarthritis is a frequent pathology, mainly affecting the elderly. The surgical treatment initially described and having proved its worth is total trapeziectomy. Since the advent of trapeziometacarpal prostheses, several studies showed the non-inferiority of this technique on clinical criteria, with superiority in bone sparing, although neither technique demonstrated overall superiority. We therefore examined the specific complications of each surgical technique by analyzing their nature and prevalence through a review of the literature to compare them on these new parameters. METHODS: Seventy-four of the 320 articles reviewed were included, 38 of which concerned trapeziectomy, and 36 concerned prostheses, for a total of 4,865 patients. They were original studies, involving adults undergoing trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty or trapeziectomy, published after 2015, reporting at least one well-described complication. RESULTS: 6.13% of trapeziectomies presented severe complications (in particular thumb collapse and metacarpophalangeal hyperextension), 3.31% moderate complications and 1.90% minor complications, leading to a 2.0% revision rate. 23.88% of prostheses had severe complications (loosening, dislocation and wear), 5.06% moderate complications and 1.36% minor complications, leading to a 12.8% revision rate. In addition, we analyzed more recent prosthesis designs separately, and found lower prevalence of severe complications (16.56%) and revision surgery (4.3%). CONCLUSION: Revision surgery for trapeziometacarpal prostheses is usually only a standard trapeziectomy with the same follow-up as first-line trapeziectomy, whereas revision surgery for trapeziectomies is much more complex and the results are uncertain. For this reason, we would reserve total trapeziectomy for revision surgeries and patients with low functional demand for whom a second surgery is not desirable. Further studies could confirm this attitude, especially focusing on the latest generation of dual mobility implants.

Self-Assessment Versus Peer-Assessment in Microsurgery Learning: A Comparative Retrospective Study in a Surgery Residents Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: In surgical learning, self-assessment allows the physician to identify and improve his strong and weak points. However, its scientific validity has yet to be demonstrated. The aim of this study was to analyze if there is a link between self-assessment accuracy and improvement in surgical skills. We make the hypothesis that an accurate self-assessment allows a greater improvement MATERIAL AND METHOD: We set up a retrospective cohort study at the tertiary University Hospital of Angers. Between 2019 and 2021, twenty-eight surgery residents took part into a microsurgery program and were included in the study. For two weeks, they performed anastomosis training on inert material and living anesthetized rats under microscope. Each resident was evaluated during the workshop by senior surgeons on 10 items: movement stability and fluidity, instrument manipulation, needles, dissection, clamp setting, vessel manipulation, suture, checking before clamp removal, checking after clamp removal, watertighness. Self-assessment was performed by the residents with the same grid, at the end of the workshop. Residents' and senior's evaluations were double-blind. We retrospectively analyzed the concordance between senior objective assessment and self-assessment, and the effect of an accurate self-assessment on technical improvement. RESULTS: Data for twenty-five residents were analyzed, 14 were female (56%). The mean age was 29 years. Surgical specialties were orthopedics (44%), maxillofacial surgery (45.4%), neurosurgery (12%), gynecology (4%) and vascular surgery (4%). According to Cohen's kappa coefficient, 14 residents (56%) underestimated themselves, 7 (28%) were concordant with peer-assessment and 4 (16%) overestimated themselves. The concordance between self and peer assessment during sessions was positive for the most objective items, and negative for the most subjective items. Technical skills improvement in term of peer-assessment averages was positive for each item in each group, without statistical differences between groups. CONCLUSION: We found that the ability to self-assess in a fast-track microsurgery module for surgery residents varied according to analyzed gestures. We demonstrated an improvement in term of self-assessment for objective items, and a decrease for subjective items. However, we didn't find any relation between improvement curve and the accuracy of self-assessment.