A Health Technology Assessment in Maxillofacial Cancer Surgery by Using the Six Sigma Methodology.

Squamous cell carcinoma represents the most common cancer affecting the oral cavity. At the University of Naples "Federico II", two different antibiotic protocols were used in patients undergoing oral mucosa cancer surgery from 2006 to 2018. From 2011, there was a shift; the combination of Cefazolin plus Clindamycin as a postoperative prophylactic protocol was chosen. In this paper, a health technology assessment (HTA) is performed by using the Six Sigma and DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control) cycle in order to compare the performance of the antibiotic protocols according to the length of hospital stay (LOS). The data (13 variables) of two groups were collected and analysed; overall, 136 patients were involved. The American Society of Anaesthesiologist score, use of lymphadenectomy or tracheotomy and the presence of infections influenced LOS significantly (p-value < 0.05) in both groups. Then, the groups were compared: the overall difference between LOS of the groups was not statistically significant, but some insights were provided by comparing the LOS of the groups according to each variable. In conclusion, in light of the insights provided by this study regarding the comparison of two antibiotic protocols, the utilization of DMAIC cycle and Six Sigma tools to perform HTA studies could be considered in future research.

Health technology assessment through Six Sigma Methodology to assess cemented and uncemented protheses in total hip arthroplasty.

The purpose of this study is to use Health Technology Assessment (HTA) through the Six Sigma (SS) and DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control) problem-solving strategies for comparing cemented and uncemented prostheses in terms of the costs incurred for Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the length of hospital stay (LOS). Multinomial logistic regression analysis for modelling the data was also performed. Quantitative parameters extracted from gait analysis, electromyography and computed tomography images were used to compare the approaches, but the analysis did not show statistical significance. The variables regarding costs were studied with the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. No statistically significant difference between cemented and uncemented prosthesis for the total cost of LOS was found, but the cost of the surgeon had an influence on the overall expenses, affecting the cemented prosthetic approach. The material costs of surgery for the uncemented prosthesis and the cost of theatre of surgery for the cemented prosthesis were the most influential. Multinomial logistic regression identified the Vastus Lateralis variable as statistically significant. The overall accuracy of the model is 93.0%. The use of SS and DMAIC cycle as tools of HTA proved that the cemented and uncemented approaches for THA have similar costs and LOSy.

Application of data mining in a cohort of Italian subjects undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging at an academic medical center.

INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is still one of the primary causes of death in the developed countries. Stress single-photon emission computed tomography is used to evaluate myocardial perfusion and ventricular function in patients with suspected or known CAD. This study sought to test data mining and machine learning tools and to compare some supervised learning algorithms in a large cohort of Italian subjects with suspected or known CAD who underwent stress myocardial perfusion imaging. METHODS: The dataset consisted of 10,265 patients with suspected or known CAD. The analysis was conducted using Knime analytics platform in order to implement Random Forests, C4.5, Gradient boosted tree, Naïve Bayes, and K nearest neighbor (KNN) after a procedure of features filtering. K-fold cross-validation was employed. RESULTS: Accuracy, error, precision, recall, and specificity were computed through the above-mentioned algorithms. Random Forests and gradients boosted trees obtained the highest accuracy (>95%), while it was comprised between 83% and 88%. The highest value for sensitivity and specificity was obtained by C4.5 (99.3%) and by Gradient boosted tree (96.9%). Naïve Bayes had the lowest precision (70.9%) and specificity (72.0%), KNN the lowest recall and sensitivity (79.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The high scores obtained by the implementation of the algorithms suggests health facilities consider the idea of including services of advanced data analysis to help clinicians in decision-making. Similar applications of this kind of study in other contexts could support this idea.