Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Primatol ; 55(3): 151-8, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11746278

ABSTRACT

Genetic studies of wild animal populations are often hindered by difficulties in obtaining blood samples. Recent advances in molecular biology have allowed the use of noninvasive samples as sources of DNA (e.g., hair or feces), but such samples may provide low-quality DNA and prevent the determination of true genotypes in subsequent DNA analysis. We present a preliminary study aimed at assessing the reliability of using fecal samples for genotyping in Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). The test was performed on samples of blood and feces from 11 captive animals, using three dinucleotide microsatellites. The CTAB DNA extraction method was found to be the most relevant for Barbary macaque feces, yielding successful amplification at all loci for 70% of PCRs. All the fecal samples tested gave correct genotypes at least once for each locus when referenced against blood-derived genotypes. An average of 18.3% of PCRs displayed spurious genotypes (false homozygous or false allele). The minimum theoretical probability required to obtain a 100% accurate genotype is 0.74, based on the criterion that a correct genotype is assessed only if it was observed at least twice. The observed probability of obtaining a correct genotype from three PCRs, based on our genotyping results, was greater (0.81 on average) than the minimum threshold. In conclusion, our comparison of blood and fecal samples showed that fecal sampling is a reliable tool for the further study of wild Barbary macaque populations.


Subject(s)
DNA/genetics , Genetic Testing/veterinary , Macaca/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Animals , Blood Specimen Collection/veterinary , Feces/chemistry , Genotype , Microsatellite Repeats , Specimen Handling
3.
Am J Primatol ; 50(3): 205-14, 2000 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10711534

ABSTRACT

Microsatellites are promising genetic markers for the study of demographic structure and phylogenetic history in populations. However, little information exists on the molecular nature of the repeats and their flanking sequences of a same microsatellite in a large range of species. In this study, we report polymorphism and consensus sequences of eight microsatellite loci using human primers in 20 primate species. The results show size polymorphism in almost all species and microsatellites. These loci are therefore useful markers for population genetic studies between populations of the same species. Insertion/deletion events are frequent in the flanking regions, the majority concerning several contiguous bases. This is in contrast with the more usual single base pair events in non-coding regions. The ranges of allele lengths in non-human primates often show no overlap with that of human, usually due to the deletion/insertion events in the flanking sequences, producing smaller allele lengths rather than smaller numbers of repeats. The use of length of PCR product will bias the inter-species interpretation reducing the number of observable alleles and treating as the same allele very divergent molecular sequences. Caution should be used when employing microsatellites in cross-species comparisons in which the species under study are separated by significant amounts of evolutionary time: in such cases allele comparison cannot be based on lengths alone.


Subject(s)
Biological Evolution , Conservation of Natural Resources , Microsatellite Repeats/genetics , Polymorphism, Genetic , Primates/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Animals , Base Sequence , DNA Primers , Genetics, Population , Humans , Molecular Sequence Data , Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...