Selective Angioembolisation of Iatrogenic Renal Artery Pseudoaneurysms Following Minimally Invasive Urological Procedures: A Single Centre Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to report our centre's experience using selective angioembolisation in the treatment of iatrogenic renal artery pseudoaneurysms (RAP) following minimally invasive urological procedures. METHODS: Our retrospective analysis included four consecutive patients treated with angioembolisation for iatrogenic RAP between October 2016 and October 2021. Data on demographics, minimally invasive urological intervention, clinical features, imaging findings, embolization procedure and perioperative details were collected. Rates of technical and clinical success, defined as 1. total occlusion of the extravasation site on completion digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and 2. resolution of symptoms, signs, and serum hemoglobin (Hb) derangements secondary to RAP, were analysed. Renal function, measured by serum creatinine (Cr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), was recorded prior to and post - angioembolisation procedure and compared. RESULTS: Mean time between urological intervention and angioembolisation was 9 days (range, 2-17 days). Rates of technical and clinical success were 100% and 100% respectively. No additional angioembolisation procedures were required, and there were no peri or post-operative complications identified during mean follow-up of 662 days (range, 30-1845 days). Mean serum Cr prior to and post angioembolisation was 83 mmol/L and 79.5 mmol/L. Mean eGFR prior to and post angioembolisation was 73.8 and 77.8 mL/min/1.73 m2. In all patients, no significant difference was observed in serum Cr and eGFR prior to and post angioembolisation. CONCLUSION: Iatrogenic renal artery pseudoaneurysms can occur following a range of minimally invasive urological procedures. This retrospective review highlights the utility of angioembolisation as a safe and effective treatment with high clinical and technical success rates. Further studies involving larger populations are required to validate its broader application.

Urological complications after cystectomy as part of pelvic exenteration are higher than that after cystectomy for primary bladder malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Total cystectomy and subsequent reconstruction of the urinary tract may be required for primary malignancy of the bladder, or in the context of multi-visceral resection for more advanced pelvic tumors. Complications following urinary diversion are a major source of morbidity, particularly in pelvic exenteration (PE) patients. METHODS: All patients who underwent radical cystectomy alone or during PE at a single tertiary referral centre between 2008 and 2014 were reviewed. Postoperative urological complications were collected and compared between groups. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-one patients underwent en bloc cystectomy (98 cystectomy alone, 133 as part of a PE). Postoperative urological complications occurred in 33% of the cystectomy alone group and 59% of the PE group (P < 0.001). PE for recurrence had higher complications than PE for primary malignancy (67% vs. 48%, P = 0.035). Urological leaks occurred in 3%, 6%, and 14% of patient who had cystectomy alone, PE for primary malignancy and PE for recurrence. Major blood loss and previous pelvic radiotherapy independently predicted conduit-associated complications in PE patients (P = 0.002 and 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Urological complications of cystectomy, particularly urine leaks and sepsis, are more common in patients undergoing PE compared to those with cystectomy alone. Prior pelvic radiotherapy, the extent of surgical resection and major blood loss may contribute to urological morbidity. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:307-311. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.