Association of hospital spending with care patterns and mortality in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality and intensive therapy is costly. However, it is unclear whether more spending is associated with better patient outcomes or how hospitals could decrease costs. OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the association between hospital spending and 14-day inpatient mortality among community-acquired pneumonia inpatients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study focused on adult pneumonia patients discharged between July 2010 and June 2015 from 260 US hospitals in the Premier database. Hospitals were divided into four pneumonia cost-of-care quartiles and average cost was calculated for each hospital. Odds of 14-day inpatient mortality and care practices were compared among high and low-cost hospitals. RESULTS: The study population comprised 534,038 patients with a mean age 69.5 (SD 16.3); 51.9% were female, 75% White, and 71.9% covered by Medicare. Hospitals were largely medium-sized (40.4%), located in the South (49.2%), and in urban areas (82.3%). The fully adjusted population-averaged cost was 14,486 US dollars (95% confidence interval [CI] 13,982-14,867). Hospital practices associated with cost included intensity of diagnostic work-up +$14 (95% CI +12 to +18; p < .0001) and de-escalation of antibiotic therapy, +$6836 (95% CI +2291 to +11,160; p = .004). There was no significant difference in odds of 14-day inpatient mortality between hospitals in the highest and lowest cost quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: Greater spending at the hospital level was not associated with lower mortality. Lower diagnostic costs were associated with lower cost of care, suggesting that judicious use of diagnostic testing might reduce costs without worsening patient outcomes.

Encouraging Our NICU to "Read-a-Latte": Leveraging a Read-a-Thon to Launch a Quality Improvement Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Preterm infants have known impairments in language development relative to infants born at full term, and the language-poor environment of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is a contributing factor. Adapting outpatient literacy programs for the NICU is a potential evidence-based intervention to encourage adult speech exposure to infants through reading sessions during NICU hospitalization. PURPOSE: To evaluate implementation of a 10-day NICU Read-a-Thon and potential barriers and facilitators of a year-round program aimed at increasing reading sessions for NICU patients. METHODS: We established an implementation team to execute a Read-a-Thon and evaluated its impact utilizing quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative methodology was used to report number of donated books and infant reading sessions. Qualitative methodology inclusive of interviews, surveys, and source document reviews was used to evaluate the Read-a-Thon. RESULTS: We received approximately 1300 donated books and logged 663 reading sessions over the 10-day Read-a-Thon. Qualitative evaluation of the Read-a-Thon identified 6 main themes: motivation, emotional response to the program, benefits and outcomes, barriers, facilitators, and future of literacy promotion in our NICU. Our evaluation informed specific aims for improvement (eg, maintaining book accessibility) for a quality improvement initiative to sustain a year-round reading program. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: Neonatal units can leverage Read-a-Thons as small tests of change to evaluate barriers, facilitators, and change processes needed to implement reading programs. Process maps of book inventory and conducting a 5 W's, 2 H's (who, what, when, where, why, how, how much) assessment can aid in program planning.