Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Braz J Phys Ther ; 25(4): 437-443, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33349526

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Executive dysfunction and risk of falling are hallmarks of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, it is unclear how executive dysfunction predisposes people with PD to falling. OBJECTIVES: To: (i) identify sensorimotor, balance, and cardiovascular risk factors for falls that discriminate between those with normal executive function and those with mild and marked executive dysfunction in people with PD and (ii) determine whether mild and marked executive dysfunction are significant risk factors for falls when adjusting for PD duration and severity and freezing of gait (FOG). METHODS: Using the Frontal Assessment Battery, 243 participants were classified into normal executive function (n = 87), mild executive dysfunction (n = 100), and marked executive dysfunction (n = 56) groups. Participants were asked if they had episodes of FOG in the last month and were assessed with the Movement Disorders Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), the Hoehn and Yahr Scale, the physiological profile assessment, and tests of orthostatic hypotension, coordinated stability, and gait and were then followed-up prospectively for falls for 32-52 weeks. RESULTS: Several PD-specific (elevated Hoehn and Yahr stage, higher MDS-UPDRS scale scores, a history of FOG, Postural Instability and Gait Difficulty subtype, and longer PD duration), sensorimotor (poor vision, knee extension weakness, slow simple reaction time), and balance (greater postural sway and poor controlled leaning balance) factors discriminated among the normal executive function and mild and marked executive dysfunction groups. Fall rates (mean ±â€¯SD) differed significantly among the groups (normal executive function: 1.0 ±â€¯1.7; mild executive dysfunction: 2.8 ±â€¯5.2; marked executive dysfunction: 4.7 ±â€¯7.3) with the presence of both mild and marked executive dysfunction identified as significant risk factors for falls when adjusting for three measures of PD severity (Hoehn and Yahr scale scores, disease duration, and FOG). CONCLUSIONS: Several PD-specific, sensorimotor, and balance factors differed significantly among the normal, mild, and marked executive dysfunction groups and both mild and marked executive dysfunction were identified as independent risk factors for falls in people with PD.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction/physiopathology , Gait Disorders, Neurologic/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease , Postural Balance/physiology , Executive Function , Gait Disorders, Neurologic/etiology , Humans , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
2.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 102(5): 874-880, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33253696

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether impairments across cognitive and affective domains provide additional information to sensorimotor deficits for fall prediction among various populations. DESIGN: We pooled data from 5 studies for this observational analysis of prospective falls. SETTING: Community or low-level care facility. PARTICIPANTS: Older people (N=1090; 74.0±9.4y; 579 female); 500 neurologically intact (NI) older people and 3 groups with neurologic disorders (cognitive impairment, n=174; multiple sclerosis (MS), n=111; Parkinson disease, n=305). INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensorimotor function was assessed with the Physiological Profile Assessment, cognitive function with tests of executive function, affect with questionnaires of depression, and concern about falling with falls efficacy questionnaires. These variables were associated with fall incidence rates, obtained prospectively over 6-12 months. RESULTS: Poorer sensorimotor function was associated with falls (incidence rate ratio [95% CI], 1.46 [1.28-1.66]). Impaired executive function was the strongest predictor of falls overall (2.91 [2.27-3.73]), followed by depressive symptoms (2.07 [1.56-2.75]) and concern about falling (2.02 [1.61-2.55]). Associations were similar among groups, except for a weaker relationship with executive impairment in NI persons and a stronger relationship with concern about falling in persons with MS. Multivariable analyses showed that executive impairment, poorer sensorimotor performance, depressive symptoms, and concern about falling were independently associated with falls. CONCLUSIONS: Deficits in cognition (executive function) and affect (depressive symptoms) and concern about falling are as important as sensorimotor function for fall prediction. These domains should be included in fall risk assessments for older people and clinical groups.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Cognitive Dysfunction/physiopathology , Mood Disorders/physiopathology , Multiple Sclerosis/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Gerontologist ; 60(4): e329-e346, 2020 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31141133

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: People with dementia become increasingly dependent on others for care as cognition declines. Decision making about placement of people with dementia into long-term institutional care can be emotionally complex. The objective of this review is to describe experiences and perspectives of people with dementia and their family caregivers in making decisions about institutional care placement. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched from inception to August 2018. Thematic synthesis was used to analyze results. RESULTS: We included 42 studies involving 123 people with dementia and 705 family caregivers from 12 countries. We identified five themes: ensuring safety (avoiding injury due to frailty, protecting against dangerous behaviors, preventing aggressive encounters), reaching breaking point (insufferable burden of caregiving, needs exceeding capabilities, intensifying family conflict, loneliness and isolation, straining under additional responsibilities, making extreme personal sacrifices), vulnerability in lacking support (ill-prepared for crisis, unable to access professional expertise, unpredictable prognostic trajectory, uncertainty navigating health care services, pressured by limited placement opportunities, high cost of placement, resenting loss of autonomy), avoiding guilt of abandonment (sharing accountability, mitigating against disagreement and stigma, reluctance to relinquish caregiving, seeking approval), and seeking reassurance and validation (preserving personhood and former identity, empowerment through engagement, assurance of care quality, acceptance from other care residents). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: People with dementia and family caregivers feel vulnerable, disempowered, and guilty in decision making about institutionalization. Person-centered communication and support strategies that foster confidence and reassurance are needed to assist people with dementia and caregivers to make decisions about placement into long-term institutional care settings.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/psychology , Decision Making , Dementia/psychology , Institutionalization , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Communication , Family , Humans , Long-Term Care , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , Quality of Health Care , Uncertainty
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31234571

ABSTRACT

People with Parkinson's disease (PD) can be classified into those with postural instability and gait difficulty (PIGD subtype) and those manifesting tremor as the main symptoms (non-PIGD subtype). In a prospective cohort study of 113 people with PD we aimed to contrast fall rates and circumstances as well as a range of disease-related, clinical, and functional measures between the PD subtypes. Compared with non-PIGD participants, PIGD participants were significantly more likely to suffer more falls overall as well as more falls due to freezing of gait, balance-related falls and falls at home. The PIGD group also performed significantly worse in a range of fall-related clinical and functional measures including general cognitive status, executive function, quadriceps muscle strength, postural sway and the timed up and go test. These findings document the extent to which people with the PIGD subtype are at increased risk of falls, the circumstances in which they fall and their disease-related, clinical and functional impairments.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Gait Disorders, Neurologic/epidemiology , Parkinson Disease/epidemiology , Aged , Cognition , Executive Function , Female , Gait , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Strength , Postural Balance/physiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time and Motion Studies , Tremor
6.
Exp Gerontol ; 111: 78-85, 2018 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30017993

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: People with Parkinson's disease (PD) can be classified into tremor dominant (TD) and postural instability and gait difficulty (PIGD) subtypes; the latter group having more impaired gait and increased fall risk. While there is some evidence that anti-parkinsonian medication, levodopa, might not improve balance and gait control or reduce fall risk in the PIGD subtype, it is unclear whether the levodopa dosage intake affects gait stability. To address these issues, this study used accelerometry to compare gait stability: (i) during before and after levodopa intake between non-PIGD and PIGD subtypes; (ii) between individuals who took less or >750 mg of levodopa/day. METHODS: In 15 non-PIGD (Combination of 13 TD patients and 2 classified as indeterminate subtype) and 23 PIGD participants of similar mean (SD) age ((63.0 (7.6) versus 62.6 (10.0) years, respectively)) and disease-duration (8.9 (8.9) versus 11.3 (4.6) years, respectively), head and trunk stability during gait was examined using anteroposterior, vertical and mediolateral acceleration harmonic ratios (HRs). Participants were assessed before and after a levodopa dose, during typical "off" and "on" periods, respectively. RESULTS: Two-way analyses of variance (group × medication status) revealed that compared to the non-PIGD subgroup, the PIGD subgroup showed significantly worse head stability (lower anteroposterior HR) in the "off" state, and significantly worse pelvis stability (significantly lower mediolateral and vertical HRs) in the "on" state (p < 0.05 for both). Levodopa was effective in treating most of the disease-related impairments (not bradykinesia) in both groups, (p < 0.05) but improved gait stability (lowered pelvis mediolateral and vertical HRs) only in people with the non-PIGD subtype (p < 0.05) and those taking <750 mg of levodopa/day (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: People with the PD PIGD subtype exhibit impaired gait stability that is not improved and frequently worsened by levodopa. New non-pharmaceutical approaches, technological (e.g. cueing) or exercise-based (e.g. balance training) are required to improve or compensate for mediolateral gait instability in this subtype and ultimately prevent falls.


Subject(s)
Gait/drug effects , Levodopa/adverse effects , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Postural Balance/drug effects , Tremor/physiopathology , Aged , Female , Head , Humans , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Torso
7.
Am J Hypertens ; 31(4): 467-479, 2018 03 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29087440

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evaluating effect of acute or chronic use of antihypertensives on risk of falls in older adults. METHODS: Data sources: Systematic search of primary research articles in CINAHL, Cochrane, EBM, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases from January 1 2007 to June 1 2017. Study selection: Research studies of cohort, case-control, case-crossover, cross-sectional, or randomized controlled trial (RCT) design examining association between antihypertensives and falls in people older than 60 years were evaluated. Data synthesis: Twenty-nine studies (N = 1,234,667 participants) were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines were used for abstracting data and random-effects inverse-variance meta-analysis was conducted on 26 articles examining chronic antihypertensive use, with odds ratios (ORs) and hazards ratios (HRs) analyzed separately. Time-risk analysis was performed on 5 articles examining acute use of antihypertensives. Outcomes: Pooled ORs and HRs were calculated to determine the association between chronic antihypertensive use and falls. For time-risk analysis, OR was plotted with respect to number of days since antihypertensive commencement, change, or dose increase. RESULTS: There was no significant association between risk of falling and chronic antihypertensive medication use (OR = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.01, I2 = 64.1%, P = 0.000; and HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-1.00, I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.706). The time-risk analysis demonstrated a significantly elevated risk of falling 0-24 hours after antihypertensive initiation, change, or dose increase. When diuretics were used, the risk remained significantly elevated till day 21. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant association between chronic use of antihypertensives and falls in older adults. Risk of falls is highest on day zero for all antihypertensive medications.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacology , Hypertension/drug therapy , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Humans , Risk Assessment
9.
Neurology ; 84(3): 304-12, 2015 Jan 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25552576

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether falls can be prevented with minimally supervised exercise targeting potentially remediable fall risk factors, i.e., poor balance, reduced leg muscle strength, and freezing of gait, in people with Parkinson disease. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-one people with Parkinson disease were randomized into exercise or usual-care control groups. Exercises were practiced for 40 to 60 minutes, 3 times weekly for 6 months. Primary outcomes were fall rates and proportion of fallers during the intervention period. Secondary outcomes were physical (balance, mobility, freezing of gait, habitual physical activity), psychological (fear of falling, affect), and quality-of-life measures. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between groups in the rate of falls (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-1.17, p = 0.18) or proportion of fallers (p = 0.45). Preplanned subgroup analysis revealed a significant interaction for disease severity (p < 0.001). In the lower disease severity subgroup, there were fewer falls in the exercise group compared with controls (IRR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.62, p < 0.001), while in the higher disease severity subgroup, there was a trend toward more falls in the exercise group (IRR = 1.61, 95% CI 0.86-3.03, p = 0.13). Postintervention, the exercise group scored significantly (p < 0.05) better than controls on the Short Physical Performance Battery, sit-to-stand, fear of falling, affect, and quality of life, after adjusting for baseline performance. CONCLUSIONS: An exercise program targeting balance, leg strength, and freezing of gait did not reduce falls but improved physical and psychological health. Falls were reduced in people with milder disease but not in those with more severe Parkinson disease. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with Parkinson disease, a minimally supervised exercise program does not reduce fall risk. This study lacked the precision to exclude a moderate reduction or modest increase in fall risk from exercise. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12608000303347).


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Exercise/physiology , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/rehabilitation , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Patient Compliance , Physical Examination , Retrospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Time Factors
10.
Mov Disord ; 26(4): 637-43, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21312283

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although Parkinson's disease (PD) is a well recognised risk factor for falls, how this disease and its therapy affect postural stability and leaning balance remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of PD and levodopa on postural sway and leaning balance. METHODS: Performances of 28 PD participants {median [inter-quartile range (IQR)] duration of PD: 10 (6-13) years, median (IQR) UPDRS motor score "off": 22 (14-31) "on" and "off" levodopa were compared with 28 age- and gender-matched healthy controls on two measures of controlled leaning balance [ratio of anterior-posterior (AP) sway to maximal balance range (MBR) and coordinated stability]. RESULTS: PD participants had greater ratio of AP sway to MBR than controls (P < 0.001), indicating that they swayed more as a proportion of their limits of stability, both "off" and "on" levodopa (P < 0.001). They also performed poorer in the coordinated stability test both "off" and "on" levodopa compared to controls (P < 0.001, for both), suggesting greater difficulty in controlling the center of mass at or near the limits of stability. Levodopa improved PD "participants" leaning balance (P < 0.001) and reduced the AP sway to MBR ratio (P < 0.001), although not to the level of controls. CONCLUSIONS: PD participants perform poorer than controls in leaning balance tests but significantly improve when "on" levodopa. Regardless of medication state, PD participants sway markedly more as a percentage of their limits of stability than controls suggesting a higher risk of falling.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease/complications , Postural Balance/physiology , Posture/physiology , Sensation Disorders/etiology , Aged , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Levodopa/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Rigidity/etiology , Neurologic Examination/methods , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Reproducibility of Results , Sensation Disorders/drug therapy , Statistics as Topic
11.
Mov Disord ; 25(9): 1217-25, 2010 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20629134

ABSTRACT

This randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment aimed to determine the effect of a 6-month minimally supervised exercise program on fall risk factors in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Forty-eight participants with PD who had fallen or were at risk of falling were randomized into exercise or control groups. The exercise group attended a monthly exercise class and exercised at home three times weekly. The intervention targeted leg muscle strength, balance, and freezing. The primary outcome measure was a PD falls risk score. The exercise group had no major adverse events and showed a greater improvement than the control group in the falls risk score, which was not statistically significant (between group mean difference = -7%, 95% CI -20 to 5, P = 0.26). There were statistically significant improvements in the exercise group compared with the control group for two secondary outcomes: Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (P = 0.03) and timed sit-to-stand (P = 0.03). There were statistically nonsignificant trends toward greater improvements in the exercise group for measures of muscle strength, walking, and fear of falling, but not for the measures of standing balance. Further investigation of the impact of exercise on falls in people with PD is warranted.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Exercise Therapy/methods , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/rehabilitation , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome , Walking/physiology
12.
Mov Disord ; 24(9): 1280-9, 2009 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19425059

ABSTRACT

The study aims were to devise (1) a fall risk screen for people with PD using routine clinical measures and (2) an explanatory (physiological) fall risk assessment for guiding fall prevention interventions. One hundred thirteen people with PD (age 66 +/- 95% CI 1.6 years) underwent clinical assessments and quantitative tests of sway, gait, strength, reaction time, and lower limb sensation. Participants were then followed up for 12 months to determine fall incidence. In the follow-up year, 51 participants (45%) fell one or more times whereas 62 participants (55%) did not fall. Multivariate analyses of routine clinical measures revealed that a fall in the past year, abnormal axial posture, cognitive impairment, and freezing of gait were independent risk factors for falls and predicted 38/51 fallers (75%) and 45/62 non-fallers (73%). A multivariate model combining clinical and physiological measures that elucidate the pathophysiology of falls identified abnormal posture, freezing of gait, frontal impairment, poor leaning balance, and leg weakness as independent risk factors. This model correctly classified 39/51 fallers (77%) and 51/62 non-fallers (82%). Patients with PD at risk of falls can be identified accurately with routine clinical assessments and quantitative physiological tests. Many of the risk factors identified are amenable to targeted intervention.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Risk Assessment , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Blood Pressure/physiology , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neurologic Examination , Neuropsychological Tests , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Predictive Value of Tests , Reaction Time/physiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Sex Factors
13.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci ; 64(6): 700-6, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19221191

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Falls are common in older people with Parkinson's disease (PD) and are likely to be related to gait disturbances associated with the condition. Although several studies have evaluated differences in basic gait parameters in people with PD, none have directly evaluated the stability of the upper body during gait. METHODS: Temporospatial gait parameters and acceleration patterns at the head and pelvis were measured in three groups of older people: 33 controls without PD (mean age 67 +/- 4 years), 33 older people with PD and no history of falls (mean age 63 +/- 4 years), and 33 older people with PD and a history of falls (mean age 67 +/- 2 years). Harmonic ratios of head and pelvis accelerations in each plane were calculated to provide an indicator of upper body stability. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, older people with PD exhibited significantly reduced walking speed and step length and increased step timing variability. Acceleration patterns were also significantly less rhythmic at the head and pelvis in all three planes. After adjusting for differences in walking speed and step timing variability, PD fallers exhibited significantly less rhythmic accelerations at the pelvis in the vertical and anteroposterior planes than PD nonfallers. CONCLUSIONS: Acceleration patterns during gait differ between older people with and without PD and between older people with PD who do and do not fall. These findings suggest that an inability to control displacements of the torso when walking may predispose older people with PD to falls.


Subject(s)
Acceleration , Accidental Falls , Gait Disorders, Neurologic/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Postural Balance , Adaptation, Physiological , Aged , Anthropometry , Biomechanical Phenomena , Case-Control Studies , Exercise Test , Female , Gait , Gait Disorders, Neurologic/etiology , Gait Disorders, Neurologic/physiopathology , Geriatric Assessment , Head Movements , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Pelvis/physiopathology , Walking
14.
BMC Neurol ; 9: 4, 2009 Jan 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19161631

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People with Parkinson's disease are twice as likely to be recurrent fallers compared to other older people. As these falls have devastating consequences, there is an urgent need to identify and test innovative interventions with the potential to reduce falls in people with Parkinson's disease. The main objective of this randomised controlled trial is to determine whether fall rates can be reduced in people with Parkinson's disease using exercise targeting three potentially remediable risk factors for falls (reduced balance, reduced leg muscle strength and freezing of gait). In addition we will establish the cost effectiveness of the exercise program from the health provider's perspective. METHODS/DESIGN: 230 community-dwelling participants with idiopathic Parkinson's disease will be recruited. Eligible participants will also have a history of falls or be identified as being at risk of falls on assessment. Participants will be randomly allocated to a usual-care control group or an intervention group which will undertake weight-bearing balance and strengthening exercises and use cueing strategies to address freezing of gait. The intervention group will choose between the home-based or support group-based mode of the program. Participants in both groups will receive standardized falls prevention advice. The primary outcome measure will be fall rates. Participants will record falls and medical interventions in a diary for the duration of the 6-month intervention period. Secondary measures include the Parkinson's Disease Falls Risk Score, maximal leg muscle strength, standing balance, the Short Physical Performance Battery, freezing of gait, health and well being, habitual physical activity and positive and negative affect schedule. DISCUSSION: No adequately powered studies have investigated exercise interventions aimed at reducing falls in people with Parkinson's disease. This trial will determine the effectiveness of the exercise intervention in reducing falls and its cost effectiveness. This pragmatic program, if found to be effective, has the potential to be implemented within existing community services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this study is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12608000303347).


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Clinical Protocols , Exercise Therapy/economics , Exercise Therapy/methods , Parkinson Disease/complications , Adult , Community-Based Participatory Research/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Gait , Humans , Muscle Strength , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Quality of Life , Research Design , Risk Factors
15.
Exp Brain Res ; 184(2): 201-9, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17717650

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that an individual's preferred or usual walking speed, step length and cadence optimize the stability of head and pelvic accelerations in vertical (V), anterior-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) planes when walking. Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis were recorded in ten healthy young adults as they walked on a level surface in three separate experiments: (1) walking at five different speeds, ranging from very slow to very fast; (2) walking in time to a metronome set at five different cadences, ranging from 33 to 167% of subjects' usual cadence; and (3) walking at five different step lengths varying from very short to very long while keeping in time with a metronome set at cadences 67, 100 and 125% of usual cadence. The results indicated that acceleration patterns in the V and AP planes were most stable when subjects walked at their usual cadence and step length. In the ML plane, stability was suboptimal, but still adequate, with the usual cadence and step length. The findings suggest that healthy young people walk in a manner that maximizes V and AP stability while maintaining adequate, though suboptimal ML stability.


Subject(s)
Acceleration , Gait/physiology , Head Movements/physiology , Pelvis/physiology , Postural Balance/physiology , Walking/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Female , Head/physiology , Humans , Leg/physiology , Locomotion/physiology , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Neck Muscles/physiology , Spine/physiology , Time Perception/physiology
16.
Gait Posture ; 20(1): 20-5, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15196515

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability of an instrumented walkway system (the GAITRite mat) for the measurement of temporal and spatial parameters of gait in young and older people. Thirty young subjects (12 males, 18 females) aged between 22 and 40 years (mean 28.5, S.D. 4.8) and 31 older subjects (13 males, 18 females) aged between 76 and 87 years (mean 80.8, S.D. 3.1) walked at a self-selected comfortable walking speed across the pressure-sensor mat three times and repeated the process approximately 2 weeks later. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation (CV) and 95% limits of agreement were then determined. For both groups of subjects, the reliability of walking speed, cadence and step length was excellent (ICCs between 0.82 and 0.92 and CVs between 1.4 and 3.5%). Base of support and toe in/out angles, although exhibiting high ICCs, were associated with higher CVs (8.3-17.7% in young subjects and 14.3-33.0% in older subjects). It is concluded that the GAITRite mat exhibits excellent reliability for most temporo-spatial gait parameters in both young and older subjects, however, base of support and toe in/out angles need to viewed with some caution, particularly in older people.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Gait/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...