Excision Repair Cross Complementation Group 1 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Nivolumab in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Background: We hypothesized that non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with a tumor positive for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the Excision Repair Cross Complementation Group 1 (ERCC-1) gene could be more genetically instable and consequently more responsive to a programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade. Methods: We evaluated the T19007C and C8092A ERCC-1 SNPs by pyrosequencing assay, on tumor specimens from two independent cohorts of patients who relapsed after one or more prior systemic treatments for advanced NSCLC and who received nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks) as part of the Italian Expanded Access Program. We aimed to assess the outcome of enrolled subjects according to the ERCC-1 SNPs status, to evaluate the role of these polymorphisms as putative biomarkers associated with a response/clinical benefit to anti-PD-1 therapies. Results: Of the 45 patients included in the final analysis, 21 (47%) and 16 (36%) were positive for the T19007C and C8092A polymorphic genotype (PG), respectively. In univariate analyses, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were shorter in patients with the T19007C PG, but neither difference achieved statistical significance (P = 0.131 and P = 0.717, respectively). The presence of the C8092A PG was associated with a longer OS and PFS, although statistical significance was only reached for PFS (P = 0.112 and P = 0.025, respectively). These results were confirmed by multivariate analyses. The response rate was only significantly higher in patients with the C8092A PG vs. wild type ERCC-1 (62 vs. 7%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Results from this hypothesis generating pilot study, provided suggestive evidence that a subgroup of NSCLC patients could benefit differently from nivolumab according to the C8092A ERCC-1 SNP status. However, these data warrant further investigation.

Predictive and prognostic value of early response assessment using 18FDG-PET in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib.

BACKGROUND: [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET is being evaluated as a tool for the early detection of response to various targeted agents in solid tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of PET response after 2 days of erlotinib in unselected pretreated patients with stage IV NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: FDG-PET/CT scans were conducted at baseline and after 2 days of erlotinib, with a CT evaluation performed at baseline and after 45-60 days of therapy. PET responses were evaluated by quantitative changes on SUVmax tumor/non-tumor ratio and classified according to EORTC criteria. PET responses were compared with RECIST responses and related to progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. Erlotinib effects on glucose uptake were also studied in a panel of NSCLC cell lines. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were enrolled. At 2 days of erlotinib, 20 (38 %) patients showed partial metabolic response (PMR), 25 (47 %) had stable metabolic disease (SMD) and 8 (15 %) had progressive metabolic disease (PMD). All patients with PMD had confirmed RECIST progression at 45-60 days. Patients with early PMR and SMD had significantly longer PFS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively) and OS (p = 0.001 for both) than PMD patients. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET assessment after 2 days of erlotinib could be useful to identify early resistant patients and to predict survival in unselected NSCLC pretreated population.

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine on days 1 and 4 every 21 days for solid tumors: result of a dose-intensity study.

BACKGROUND: Three and 4-week cisplatin-gemcitabine schedules have shown similar dose-intensity (DI) and activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The 3-week schedule is generally preferred because it enables better treatment compliance. To improve DI and compliance further, we delivered gemcitabine plus cisplatin over 4 days every 21 days. METHODS: Patients with any stage NSCLC or epithelial neoplasms and an ECOG PS < or = 2 were given gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 4 plus cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) on day 2 of a 21-day cycle. Minimax design was used and a received DI for gemcitabine of > or = 580 mg/m(2)/wk was considered successful. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (34 NSCLC, 5 epithelial neoplasias) were enrolled. SWOG grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 17.9% and 12.8% of patients, respectively. Nonhematological toxicity was minimal. Twenty-eight (18%) of 158 cycles required dose modifications and/or delays. Twenty-five patients received a gemcitabine dose intensity of > or = 580 mg/m(2)/wk. The received DIs were 601.8 mg/m(2)/wk for gemcitabine and 21.0 for cisplatin, with a relative DIs of 90.3% and 90.1%, respectively. The response rate of 27 evaluable patients with NSCLC was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.3 to 62.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The shorter schedule of gemcitabine on days 1 and 4 plus cisplatin on day 2 produces an effective DI and a toxicity profile comparable to that of weekly regimens.

Short schedule of cisplatin and vinorelbine: a dose-finding study in non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: A dose-finding study of a new cisplatin/vinorelbine schedule was done to increase activity of the combination, and improve compliance of non-small-cell lung cancer PATIENTS. METHODS: Beginning with cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) on days 1, 2 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) on days 1, 3, increasing dose levels up to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were tested in a series of 6-patient cohorts. If 3 of 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity in the first 3 cycles, the previous dose was considered the recommended dose (RD). Once the MTD was reached, granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor was prophylactically added to the treatment of a new patient cohort to improve the therapeutic ratio. RESULTS: We enrolled 35 stage IIIA/B or IV patients between August 2001 and February 2002. The RD was cisplatin 45 mg/m(2) and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2), with relative dose intensities (RDIs) of 95 and 97%, respectively, and an actual received dose intensity (ARDI) of 28.62 and 16.07 mg/m(2)/week, respectively. Overall grade 3-4 toxicities were: neutropenia (71%), febrile neutropenia (25%), anemia (8%), and constipation (17%). The overall response rate was 64.3% (CI: 44.1-81.4%). CONCLUSIONS: ARDI and RDI of our modified cisplatin/vinorelbine regimen were not inferior to those of conventional weekly schedules; its acceptable toxicity profile and manageability may justify its use in clinical practice.

[Stromal tumors of the small intestine. Retrospective analysis of 9 cases surgically treated]. / I tumori stromali dell'intestino tenue. Analisi retrospettiva di 9 casi trattati chirurgicamente.

The authors report on their experience with 9 patients with small bowel stromal tumours who underwent surgical treatment over the period 1974-2001. Seven were males and 2 females, with an average age of 63.1 years (range: 49-72 years). Histologically, 4 tumours showed evidence of differentiation towards smooth muscle elements (1 benign and 3 malignant), 4 towards neural elements (all malignant) and 1 lacked differentiation towards either cell type. Five tumours were located in the ileum, 3 in the jejunum and 1 in the duodenum. The main symptoms were abdominal pain and an abdominal mass, and the most sensitive diagnostic technique was abdominal CT scan. In the 8 jejunal or ileal stromal tumours we performed a typical intestinal resection, while undifferentiated duodenal stromal tumours were managed by pancreaticoduodenectomy. The diagnosis was only histological. There was no operative mortality, while 2 postoperative complications (1 pancreatic fistula and 1 myocardial infarction) occurred. The patient with jejunal benign muscular stromal tumour is still alive and in good health 73 months after the operation. Of the 3 patients with malignant muscular ileal stroma tumours, 1 is alive and free from disease 63 months after the operation, while the other 2 died of metastatic disease 39 and 29 months after surgery. Of the 4 patients with malignant neural stromal tumours (2 jejunal and 2 ileal) 1 with jejunal and 1 with ileal tumour were lost to follow-up, while 1 is still alive and in good health 101 months postoperatively; the 4th patient, with jejunal disease, developed liver metastasis 14 months after small bowel resection and died 12 months later. The patient with undifferentiated duodenal stromal tumour died of liver metastases 38 months after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Small bowel stromal tumours are more often than not malignant. The most frequent symptoms are abdominal pain and a palpable mass, but no specific signs have been detected. Abdominal CT scan is the most sensitive diagnostic technique in the evaluation of the location, size, invasion of adjacent organs and metastases. The treatment must be intestinal resection, and prognostic prediction on the basis of histological findings is difficult.