Impact of digital transformation on the future of medical education and practice.

In this article, the author provides synopses of the factors that have finally propelled health-care education and practice to join, at times reluctantly, the overarching digital transformative process that has been swept other industries over the last few decades. The key contributors and driving forces that have energized the entry of health-care education and practices are mentioned. The roles of major universities, large technology companies, and the expanding roles of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning are described. The projected future developments are predicted to continue to be substantial, sweeping, and forcing changes that are unprecedented. Thus, academicians and practitioners should be alerted to what the rapidly changing landscape is likely to become and accordingly take steps to manage and preserve their roles or risk be left behind or worse be forced out.

Editorial: Telemedicine in the era of coronavirus 19: Implications for postoperative care in cardiac surgery.

Telemedicine, telehealth and artificial intelligence in healthcare are becoming commonly utilized in various medical specialties. The article authored by Dr. Aminah Sallam and colleagues in the Journal provides data in support of the cardiac surgical patients, and the caring cardiac surgeons willingness to adopt telemedicine as a method of connectivity between patient and surgeon.

Lessons learned on a new procedure: Nonsternotomy minimally invasive pulmonary embolectomy.

The endpoint in emergent management of acute massive pulmonary embolism (PE) has traditionally been with embolectomy through a standard median sternotomy. This approach is limited in both exposure and concomitant functional morbidity associated with sternotomy. In a previous publication, we described a novel minimally invasive, thoracoscopically assisted approach to pulmonary embolectomy. This approach utilized a small 5-cm left upper parasternal thoracotomy and femoral cardiopulmonary bypass to conduct thoracoscopically assisted surgical pulmonary embolectomy. The first publication featured three patients that had a massive pulmonary embolus that was treated with minimally invasive pulmonary embolectomy, and the initial data was positive and suggested that this approach is safe and feasible. We now broaden our experience with another two patients who underwent this approach, and highlight a number of technical and management modifications that have been made to optimize the procedure. These lessons learned will ideally benefit future surgeons as this approach is more heavily implemented in practice.

Priorities in coronary artery bypass grafting: Is midterm survival more dependent on completeness of revascularization or multiple arterial grafts?

OBJECTIVE: Both completeness of revascularization and multiple arterial grafts (multiple arterial coronary artery bypass grafting) have been associated with increased midterm survival after coronary artery bypass grafting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative impact of completeness of revascularization and multiple arterial coronary artery bypass grafting on midterm survival after coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: A retrospective review of 17,411 isolated, primary coronary artery bypass grafting operations from January 2002 to June 2016 at a US academic institution was performed. Patients were divided into groups based on complete or incomplete revascularization and number of arterial grafts. Inverse probability of treatment weighting based on the generalized propensity score was performed to minimize imbalance in preoperative characteristics. Between-group differences in outcomes were assessed using multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses, incorporating the propensity score weights. RESULTS: Patients undergoing multiple arterial coronary artery bypass grafting in this study were younger, had fewer comorbid conditions, and had lower incidence of left main stenosis compared with patients undergoing single-arterial coronary artery bypass grafting. Short-term perioperative outcomes were similar between groups once propensity score weighting was used to minimize between-group differences in preoperative variables. Median follow-up in the entire population was 630 days, but was 1366 days in the cohort with data available from the Social Security Death Index. Multiple arterial coronary artery bypass grafting was protective for midterm survival compared with single arterial coronary artery bypass grafting, regardless of complete or incomplete revascularization or strategy (multiple arterial complete revascularization vs single-arterial complete revascularization: hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.97; P = .02; multiple arterial incomplete revascularization vs single-arterial incomplete revascularization: hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.90; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for preoperative comorbidities, multiple arterial coronary artery bypass grafting provides a modest midterm survival benefit over single-arterial coronary artery bypass grafting irrespective of completeness of revascularization, suggesting that when forced to choose, surgeons may elect to pursue multiple arterial conduits.

Response to COVID-19 pandemic: Beyond medical education in Brazil.

We received a response to our Editorial from a group in Brazil that raised valuable concerns about the struggles in transforming medical education in low-income countries. Here, we address the concerns they raised that reinforce the global need for a "Coalition for Medical Education."

Initial Experience with Non-Sternotomy Minimally Invasive Pulmonary Embolectomy with Thoracoscopic Assistance.

The endpoint in emergent management of acute massive pulmonary embolism (PE) has traditionally been with embolectomy through standard median sternotomy. This approach is limited in both exposure and concomitant functional morbidity associated with sternotomy. Herein we describe a novel minimally invasive, thoracoscopically assisted approach to pulmonary embolectomy. This utilizes a small 5-cm left parasternal thoracotomy and femoral cardiopulmonary bypass to conduct thoracoscopically assisted surgical pulmonary embolectomy. This novel minimally invasive approach has been developed and successfully utilized in 3 patients with massive PE at our institution. The assistance of the thoracoscope allowed for complete visualization and clot extraction of the main and segmental pulmonary arteries bilaterally. The use of a non-sternotomy approach sped both functional and pulmonary recovery times and decreased length of stay. These initial data suggest that non-sternotomy minimally invasive surgical pulmonary embolectomy with thoracoscopic assistance is a feasible and safe approach for acute massive PE that may result in enhanced recovery times and decreased hospital length of stay.

Coalition for medical education-A call to action: A proposition to adapt clinical medical education to meet the needs of students and other healthcare learners during COVID-19.

With the ongoing coronavirus, journals and the media have extensively covered the impacts on doctors, nurses, physician assistants, and other healthcare workers. However, one group that has rarely been mentioned despite being significantly impacted is medical students and medical education overall. This piece, prepared by both a medical student and a cardiothoracic surgeon with a long career in academic medicine, discusses the recent history of medical education and how it has led to issues now with distance-based learning due to COVID-19. It concludes with a call to action for the medical education system to adapt so it can meet the needs of healthcare learners during COVID-19 and even beyond.

Outcomes Following Shock Aortic Valve Replacement: Transcatheter Versus Surgical Approaches.

OBJECTIVES: To compare transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients in shock. BACKGROUND: There are minimal data on the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes for patients in shock that undergo TAVR and no data comparing these outcomes to similar patients undergoing SAVR. METHODS: This is a single center, retrospective cohort study of patients having Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)-defined urgent or emergent AVR for aortic stenosis with clinical signs and symptoms of shock. Inclusion criteria were based on the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) shock consensus statement and included: the need for inotropic or vasopressor agents, mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy or newly initiated hemodialysis, and/or utilization of mechanical hemodynamic support. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes for TAVR and SAVR were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria for this study (17 TAVR, 20 SAVR). TAVR patients had a higher STS Predicted Risk of Mortality (PROM) score of 22.3% compared to 11.8% for SAVR patients (p = 0.001). No significant differences were found in baseline echocardiographic results. TAVR procedures required less procedure room time (185.9 min TAVR, 348.5 min SAVR, p < 0.001) and fewer intraoperative packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions (0.2 units TAVR, 3.4 units SAVR, p < 0.001). TAVR patients also had lower rates of prolonged postoperative ventilation compared to SAVR patients (38.5% TAVR, 75.0% SAVR, p = 0.047). TAVR and SAVR had similar rates of mortality at discharge (2 TAVR, 1 SAVR, p = 0.584), 30-days (2 TAVR, 1 SAVR, p = 0.584), and 1-year (8 TAVR, 5 SAVR, p = 0.149). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher risk TAVR group, patients in shock undergoing either TAVR or SAVR have similar 30-day mortality. At one year, SAVR patients have a numerically better, though not statistically significant, survival. These findings support the use of TAVR for patients in shock with aortic stenosis.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Undergoing Valvular and Aortic Surgery: A Modern Assessment of Risk.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence and outcomes of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are well defined for general cardiac surgical populations. The purpose of this study was to define the outcomes of patients with HIT in a population excluding patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: The local Society of Thoracic Surgeons cardiac surgical database was queried between January 2008 and May 2017 for patients who underwent either open valvular surgery or aortic surgery. Patients who underwent either isolated or combined CABG procedures were excluded. Cohorts were formed based on the presence or absence of postoperative HIT. Logistic regression models were built to determine the association between postoperative HIT and outcomes, adjusted for both preoperative and intraoperative variables. RESULTS: Of the total cohort (8,107 patients), 176 patients (2.2%) developed HIT after surgery. HIT patients experienced an increased incidence of morbidities postoperatively, including reoperation for bleeding, reoperation for cardiac and noncardiac etiologies, postoperative stroke, perioperative myocardial infarction, postoperative sternal infection, postoperative arrhythmia, new-onset renal failure, and dialysis (all with P < 0.01). The unadjusted 30-day mortality was 14.8% in HIT patients vs 4.9% in those without HIT (P < 0.01). After risk adjustment, reoperation for noncardiac events, renal failure, new dialysis, postoperative stroke, arrhythmia, and sternal wound infection remained significantly elevated in patients who developed postoperative HIT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who developed HIT after non-CABG cardiac surgery experienced increased postoperative rates of morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and treatment remained mainstays of therapy. Early identification of patients at highest risk should prompt careful risk stratification when possible.

Outcomes of convergent atrial fibrillation ablation with continuous rhythm monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) are suboptimal. The convergent procedure (CP) may offer improved efficacy by combining endocardial and epicardial ablation. METHODS: We reviewed 113 consecutive patients undergoing the CP at our institution. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the presence (n = 92) or absence (n = 21) of continuous rhythm monitoring (CM) following the CP. Outcomes were reported in two ways. First, using a conventional definition of any atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia (AF/AT) recurrence lasting >30 seconds, after a 90 day blanking period. Second, by determining AF/AT burden at relevant time points in the group with CM. RESULTS: Across the entire cohort, 88% had either persistent or long-standing persistent AF, mean duration of AF diagnosis before the CP was 5.1 ± 4.6 years, 45% had undergone at least one prior AF ablation, 31% had impaired left ventricle ejection fraction and 62% met criteria for moderate or severe left atrial enlargement. Mean duration of follow-up after the CP was 501 ± 355 days. In the entire cohort, survival free from any AF/AT episode >30 seconds at 12 months after the blanking period was 53%. However, among those in the CM group who experienced recurrences, mean burden of AF/AT was generally very low (<5%) and remained stable over the duration of follow-up. Ten patients (9%) required elective cardioversion outside the 90 day blanking period, 11 patients (9.7%) underwent repeat ablation at a mean of 229 ± 178 days post-CP and 64% were off AADs at the last follow-up. Procedural complications decreased significantly following the transition from transdiaphragmatic to sub-xiphoid surgical access: 23% versus 3.8% (P = .005) CONCLUSIONS: In a large, consecutive series of patients with predominantly PeAF, the CP was capable of reducing AF burden to very low levels (generally <5%), which appeared durable over time. Complication rates associated with the CP decreased significantly with the transition from transdiaphragmatic to sub-xiphoid surgical access. Future trials will be necessary to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from the convergent approach.

A comparison of surgical pulmonary embolectomy and catheter-directed lysis for life-threatening pulmonary emboli.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with life-threatening pulmonary emboli (PE) have traditionally been treated with anticoagulation alone, yet emerging data suggest that more aggressive therapy may improve short-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes between catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDL) and surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) in the treatment of life-threatening PE. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre observational study was conducted for patients who underwent SPE or CDL at a single US academic centre. Preprocedural and postprocedural echocardiographic data were collected. Unadjusted regression models were constructed to assess the significance of the between-group postoperative differences. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients suffered a life-threatening PE during the study period [60 SPE (47.6%), 66 CDL 52.4%]. Ten (24.4%) SPE patients and 10 (15.2%) CDL patients had massive PEs marked by preprocedural hypotension. Six (10.0%) SPE patients and 4 (6.0%) CDL patients suffered a preprocedure cardiac arrest (P = 0.41). In-hospital mortality rate was 3.3% (2) for SPE, and 3.0% (2) for CDL (P = 0.99). SPE patients were more likely to require prolonged ventilation (15.0% vs 1.5%, P = 0.01). No significant differences were found in other major complications. At baseline echocardiography, 76.9% of SPE patients and 56.9% of CDL patients had moderate or severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Both treatment groups showed marked and durable improvement in echocardiographic markers of RV function from baseline at midterm follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Both SPE and CDL can be applied to well-selected high-risk patients with low rates of morbidity and mortality. Further research is necessary to delineate which patients would benefit most from either SPE or CDL following a life-threatening PE.

Outcomes of percutaneous vacuum-assisted debulking of large vegetations as an adjunct to lead extraction.

BACKGROUND: Consensus statements on lead extraction give consideration to open surgical removal in the setting of large vegetations, to mitigate the risk of massive embolism that may occur with percutaneous lead removal. Vacuum-assisted debulking (VD) of large vegetations as an adjunct to percutaneous lead extraction may provide an opportunity to mitigate these risks. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients undergoing lead extraction at our institution for endovascular infection from 2012 to 2018 and stratified them into two groups based on presence of adjunctive VD (n = 6) or without VD (no-VD, n = 39). VD was performed with the AngioVac system (Angio-Dynamics, Latham, NY, USA). RESULTS: Across the cohort, mean age was 62 ± 15 years, ejection fraction was 41 ± 16%, and 39% had end-stage renal disease on dialysis. Defibrillator systems were present in 71%, and 22% had cardiac resynchronization devices. Mean duration of the oldest extracted lead was 6.3 ± 4.9 years. There were no significant differences in baseline covariates between groups. Those in the VD group were significantly less likely to have Staphylococcus aureus as a causative organism (P = .04). In the VD group, vegetations targeted for debulking ranged in size from 1.8 to 6 cm (longest dimension). There were no operative deaths or clinically evident embolic events in either group. The overall nonfatal complication rate in the VD group was higher (33.3% vs 2.3%, P = .043). CONCLUSION: VD can be performed as an adjunct to percutaneous lead extraction with a reasonable safety profile. The relative safety and efficacy of this approach removal requires further study.

Predicted Risk of Mortality Score predicts 30-day readmission after coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE: Quality metrics and reimbursement models focus on 30-day readmission rates after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Certain preoperative variables are associated with higher rates of readmission. The purpose of this study was to determine whether STS Predicted Risk of Mortality (PROM) scores predict 30-day readmission following CABG. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing isolated CABG between 2002 and 2017 at a US academic institution was performed. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between PROM and 30-day readmission, and the area under the receiver-operator curve (ROC) was calculated to estimate predictive accuracy. RESULTS: During the study period, 21,719 patients underwent CABG and 2,023 (9.2%) were readmitted within 30 days. Readmitted patients were sicker with higher rates of comorbid conditions and higher STS PROM scores (1.03% vs 1.42%, GMR 1.33, CI 1.27-1.38, p < 0.0001). Median time to readmission was 8 days (IQR 4-15) with length of stay 5 days (4-6). By PROM quintile, higher PROM scores were associated with increased odds of readmission. PROM-adjusted 30-day mortality was higher in the readmitted group (1.04% vs 0.21%, OR 4.53, CI 2.67-7.69, p < 0.001), and mid-term survival was worse as well. PROM alone was a modest predictor of readmission (area under ROC 0.59, CI 0.57-0.60) compared to insurance status (0.55, 0.53-0.56), ejection fraction (0.52, 0.50-0.54), and history of heart failure (0.51, 0.50-0.52). CONCLUSION: STS PROM scores are associated with increased risk of readmission following CABG.

Procedural outcomes and long-term survival associated with lead extraction in patients with abandoned leads.

BACKGROUND: The decision to abandon or extract superfluous sterile leads is controversial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare procedural outcomes and long-term survival of patients with and those without abandoned leads undergoing lead extraction (LE). METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients who had undergone transvenous LE at our institution from January 2007 to May 2016 was performed. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on the presence (group 1) or absence (group 2) of abandoned leads. RESULTS: Among 774 patients who had undergone LE procedures, 38 (4.9%) had abandoned leads (group 1). Dwell time of the oldest extracted lead was longer in group 1 vs group 2 (7.6 ± 4.9 years vs 5.6 ± 4.4 years; P = .017), as was infection as an indication for LE (76% vs 33%; P <.001). A bailout femoral approach was more commonly required in group 1 than in group 2 (18.4% vs 6%; P = .007). Complete procedural success rates were similar (92.1% in group 1 vs 95.0% in group 2; P = .439), but there was a trend toward lower clinical success in group 1 (92.1% vs 97.4%; P = .088), primarily due to failure to remove all hardware in the setting of infection. Major procedural complication rates were similar (2.6% in group 1 vs 1.2% in group 2; P = .397), as was long-term survival (mean follow-up 2.3 ± 2.2 years). CONCLUSION: Abandoned leads at the time of LE were associated with increased procedural complexity, including a higher rate of bailout femoral extraction, and may be associated with lower clinical success. Among appropriately selected patients, consideration should be given to LE instead of abandonment.

Operative strategies to reduce cerebral embolic events during on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: A stratified, prospective randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of different aortic clamping strategies on the incidence of cerebral embolic events during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015, 142 patients with low-grade aortic disease (epiaortic ultrasound grade I/II) undergoing primary isolated CABG were studied. Those undergoing off-pump CABG were randomized to a partial clamp (n = 36) or clampless facilitating device (CFD; n = 36) strategy. Those undergoing on-pump CABG were randomized to a single-clamp (n = 34) or double-clamp (n = 36) strategy. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) was performed to identify high-intensity transient signals (HITS) in the middle cerebral arteries during periods of aortic manipulation. Neurocognitive testing was performed at baseline and 30-days postoperatively. The primary endpoint was total number of HITS detected by TCD. Groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: In the off-pump group, the median number of total HITS were higher in the CFD subgroup (30.0; interquartile range [IQR], 22-43) compared with the partial clamp subgroup (7.0; IQR, 0-16; P < .0001). In the CFD subgroup, the median number of total HITS was significantly lower for patients with 1 CFD compared with patients with >1 CFD (12.5 [IQR, 4-19] vs 36.0 [IQR, 25-47]; P = .001). In the on-pump group, the median number of total HITS was 10.0 (IQR, 3-17) in the single-clamp group, compared with 16.0 (IQR, 4-49) in the double-clamp group (P = .10). There were no differences in neurocognitive outcomes across the groups. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with low-grade aortic disease, the use of CFDs was associated with an increased rate of cerebral embolic events compared with partial clamping during off-pump CABG. A single-clamp strategy during on-pump CABG did not significantly reduce embolic events compared with a double-clamp strategy.

The Racial Paradox in Multiarterial Conduit Utilization for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

BACKGROUND: It has been established that outcomes for black patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) are inferior to those of their white counterparts. The purpose of this study was to determine (1) whether rates of multiarterial grafting are different among black patients and white patients, and (2) whether racial differences exist in postoperative outcomes after accounting for grafting strategy. METHODS: A retrospective review of black patients (n = 2,810) and white patients (n = 13,569) who underwent isolated, primary CABG from January 2002 to June 2014 at a US academic institution was performed. A modified predicted risk of mortality (M-PROM) score was calculated for each patient using all The Society of Thoracic Surgeons variables for CABG excluding race. Multivariable linear, logistic, and Cox regression analyses were used to assess between-group differences, adjusted for M-PROM. RESULTS: Overall, 16,379 patients underwent CABG, and 2,441 (14.9%) received more than one arterial graft. When adjusted for M-PROM, the odds of blacks undergoing multiarterial CABG were 10% greater than for whites (p = 0.05). Blacks had worse inhospital outcomes, including higher odds of stroke (odds ratio 2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.80 to 3.25) and prolonged intubation (odds ratio 2.01, 95% CI: 1.77 to 2.28). The increase in postoperative complications did not translate to a difference in inhospital mortality (p = 0.10) between racial cohorts. Moreover, among patients who underwent multiarterial grafting strategies, blacks had a hazard of mortality that was 34% higher (95% CI: 22% to 51%)) than that of their white counterparts. Among black patients, those who underwent multiarterial grafting strategies showed better long-term survival than those undergoing single grafting strategies (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar rates of arterial grafting for black patients and white patients in this large single-center cohort, black patients continued to have significantly worse late survival when compared with white patients. Continued evaluation as to the causes of this disparity is warranted.