ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To review and evaluate the efficacy and complication rates of external and internal blepharoptosis repair techniques in pediatric patients. METHODS: The systematic review protocol was published on PROSPERO (CRD42020197343). Embase, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched without date limitations. Two independent reviewers evaluated the articles for inclusion. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using GRADE and Cochrane's ROBINS-I tool, respectively. RESULTS: Of 2,228 articles screened, 23 studies involving 730 patients were included. There were 20 case series and 3 retrospective cohort studies, but no randomized controlled studies. Overall study quality was low with serious risk of bias according to the GRADE and ROBINS-I criteria, respectively. External levator resection was the most studied procedure, evaluated in 18 studies. Seven studies investigated internal approaches including the Fasanella-Servat procedure. There was no standardized evaluation of surgical efficacy. Reoperation rates were 16.6% (range 3.6-50.9%) for external levator resection compared with 22.2% (range 0.0-25.8%) for internal approaches. The commonest postoperative complications were not sight-threatening. The most consistently reported complication was undercorrection, occurring at rates of 8.4% (range 2.4-16.7%) and 15.3% (range 2.7-75.0%) for external levator resection and internal approaches, respectively. There were no consistently applied, validated patient-reported outcomes or cosmetic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: External and internal approaches have been successfully employed in pediatric blepharoptosis repair. However, noncomparative designs and risk-of-bias limit existing studies. Thus, prospectively designed studies with standardized outcome measures are required to minimize reporting bias, facilitate evidence synthesis, and support clinical decision making.
