Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 46(9): 524-530, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32682692

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine if anesthesia providers can accurately estimate the cost of commonly used medications, supplies, and blood products. METHODS: This study was conducted between April and June 2019 at an academic tertiary care hospital. Anesthesia providers (certified registered nurse anesthetists [CRNAs], residents, and fellows/attendings) were surveyed on their knowledge of the cost of commonly used therapies. Items were sorted into 12 categories: opioids, non-opioid analgesia, vasopressors, hypertension medications, antibiotics, neuromuscular blockers, reversals, anesthetics, supplies, kits, blood products, and blood-related products. Estimates were considered to be accurate if the median cost differed from the average wholesale price by < 25%, moderately inaccurate if between 25% and 50%, and severely inaccurate if by > 50%. RESULTS: A total of 107 surveys (CRNAs: 25, residents: 36, fellows/attendings: 46) were returned. The percentage of total items accurately estimated for cost was low (22% for all providers), and was not different between provider types (27% for CRNAs, 23% for residents, 20% for fellows/attendings; p = 0.69). The percentage of items with severe inaccuracies in cost estimation was high and was not different between provider types (56% for CRNAs, 60% for residents, 50% for fellows/attendings; p = 0.53). Rates of under- and overestimation varied widely, with greatest underestimation for vasopressors and blood-related products, and greatest overestimation for non-opioid analgesia and antibiotics. Low- and high-cost category items tended to be overestimated and underestimated, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The majority of anesthesia providers have poor knowledge of cost. These findings suggest that cost awareness interventions may be necessary for promoting high-value health care.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Nurse Anesthetists , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Anticancer Res ; 30(9): 3295-300, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20944100

ABSTRACT

AIM: Brucea javanica was studied to identify nuclear factor kappaB (NF-κB) inhibitors exhibiting reactive oxygen species (ROS) intracellular amplification. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight compounds were evaluated for selective cytotoxicity using HT-29, HeLa, and HL-60 cells, and in a NF-κB assay. Active compounds were then tested using ROS and mitochondria transmembrane potential (MTP) assays. NF-κB and nuclear factor activated T-cell (NFAT) translocation were also assessed using their respective whole cell assays. RESULTS: Bruceajavanone B, bruceantin, bruceine A, (-)-hydnocarpin, and chrysoeriol exhibited cytotoxic potential and NF-κB p65 inhibition. Chrysoeriol exhibited selective cytotoxicity against leukemia cells with greater potency and also showed an ability to up-regulate NFAT transcriptional pathways through the amplification of intracellular ROS, in the presence of H2O2, to a greater degree than bruceantin and bruceine. CONCLUSION: Chrysoeriol selectively kills leukemic cells and potentiates the amplification of ROS levels. Therefore, chrysoeriol could serve as a potential chemotherapeutic modifier for leukemia chemotherapy since leukemia cells have a higher susceptibility to elevated ROS levels.


Subject(s)
Brucea/chemistry , NF-kappa B/antagonists & inhibitors , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Flavones , Flavonoids/pharmacology , Flavonolignans/pharmacology , Humans , Membrane Potential, Mitochondrial/drug effects , NF-kappa B/metabolism , NFATC Transcription Factors/drug effects , NFATC Transcription Factors/metabolism , Quassins/pharmacology , Triterpenes/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...