Comparison of Tetrasodium EDTA 4% with Sodium Citrate 4% as Line-Locking Solutions at 2 Tertiary Hemodialysis Centres.

Background: The patency of central venous catheters (CVCs) in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) is maintained by instilling sodium citrate 4% (SC 4%) locking solution. Alteplase, a thrombolytic agent, is administered to restore function if patency is lost. Objective: To compare SC 4% with a new line-locking solution, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid 4% (EDTA 4%), in terms of CVC patency and alteplase use. Methods: This retrospective chart review included all HD patients who were switched from SC 4% to EDTA 4% locking solution at 2 tertiary HD centres between June and December 2021. Patients were switched to EDTA 4% if they had high usage of alteplase (receiving ≥ 2 doses of alteplase in a 2-week period). For each line-locking agent, HD pump speeds and alteplase use were analyzed over 2 consecutive 12-week periods. Mean serum calcium and ionized calcium values were recorded during each period. A cost analysis was also performed. Results: A total of 37 HD patients were switched to EDTA 4% during the study period. There was no difference in mean HD pump speed between SC 4% and EDTA 4% (307.7 vs 305.1 mL/min, p = 0.48). The number of catheter-use-days on which alteplase was required declined significantly, from 313 days with SC 4% to 94 days with EDTA 4% (p < 0.001), with an overall cost reduction of 34% ($13 183.21). The decrease in alteplase usage was primarily driven by 1 of the 2 sites. A statistically significant decrease in mean ionized calcium at site 2 (from 1.12 to 1.1 mmol/L, p = 0.037) was noted. As well, an intraluminal interaction between EDTA 4% and serum calcium caused 6 cases of low serum calcium. Conclusions: This study showed that use of EDTA 4% as a line-locking agent reduced alteplase usage in the CVCs of HD patients while maintaining adequate pump speed (i.e., ≥ 300 mL/min).

Contexte: La perméabilité des cathéters veineux centraux (CVC) chez les patients hémodialysés (HD) est maintenue en instillant une solution de verrouillage de citrate de sodium à 4 % (CS 4 %). L'alteplase, un agent thrombolytique, est administré pour rétablir la fonction en cas de perte de perméabilité. Objectif: Comparer la solution de CS 4 % et une nouvelle solution de verrouillage, l'acide éthylènediaminetétraacétique 4 % (EDTA 4 %), en termes de perméabilité du CVC et d'utilisation de l'alteplase. Méthodes: Cet examen rétrospectif des dossiers a été réalisé pour tous les patients HD qui sont passés de la solution de verrouillage de CS 4 % à la solution d'EDTA 4 % dans 2 centres d'hémodialyse tertiaires au cours de la période de juin à décembre 2021. Les patients sont passés à l'EDTA 4 % en cas d'utilisation élevée de l'alteplase (≥ 2 doses d'alteplase reçues sur une période de 2 semaines). Pour chaque agent de verrouillage, les vitesses de la pompe d'hémodialyse et l'utilisation de l'alteplase ont été analysées sur 2 périodes consécutives de 12 semaines. Les valeurs moyennes de calcium sérique et de calcium ionisé ont été enregistrées au cours de chaque période. Une analyse des coûts a également été réalisée. Résultats: Au total, 37 patients HD sont passés à l'EDTA 4 % au cours de la période de l'étude. Aucune différence dans la vitesse moyenne de la pompe d'hémodialyse n'a été constatée en cas d'utilisation de la solution de CS 4 % ou d'EDTA 4 % (307,7 c. 305,1 mL/min, p = 0,48). Le nombre de jours d'utilisation du cathéter qui ont nécessité l'utilisation de l'alteplase a diminué de manière significative, passant de 313 jours avec la solution de CS 4 % à 94 jours avec l'EDTA 4 % (p < 0,001); la réduction globale des coûts se montait à 34 % (économies de 13 183,21 $). L'utilisation moins importante de l'alteplase était principalement due à 1 des 2 sites. Une diminution significative du calcium ionisé moyen (1,12 c. 1,1 mmol/L, p = 0,037) a été observée au deuxième site. De plus, une interaction intraluminale entre l'EDTA 4 % et le calcium sérique a provoqué 6 cas d'hypocalcémie. Conclusions: Cette étude a montré que l'utilisation de l'EDTA 4 % comme agent de verrouillage réduisait l'utilisation de l'alteplase dans les CVC des patients HD tout en maintenant une vitesse de pompe adéquate (c'est-à-dire ≥ 300 mL/min).

Semaglutide-Associated Acute Interstitial Nephritis: A Case Report.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are being investigated to slow the decline of kidney function in type 2 diabetics with chronic kidney disease (CKD). These agents have proven benefits on cardiac outcomes and all-cause mortality as well as in reducing the incidence of macroalbuminuria. Ours is a case of drug-associated acute interstitial nephritis requiring hemodialysis temporally related to a semaglutide dose increase. This case is unique as the index patient had no underlying CKD. Limited cases of acute kidney injury, superimposed on underlying CKD, in patients taking the GLP-1RA semaglutide have been reported. To our knowledge, there are no existing case reports in the literature of GLP-1RA-associated acute interstitial nephritis in a patient with baseline normal kidney function. Because our prescription of these agents is increasing and is anticipated to increase further with growing scientific evidence for their benefit, we sought to highlight this possible, important serious adverse effect of semaglutide.

Effectiveness of a hepatitis B vaccination program at two tertiary hemodialysis centers.

INTRODUCTION: Hemodialysis (HD) patients are at increased risk of hepatitis B infection in comparison to the general population. Despite a more intensified hepatitis vaccination regimen, response rates in HD patients are typically low. The study was conducted to quantify response rate to a new hepatitis B vaccination protocol initiated in late 2015, determine risk factors affecting response rate, and assess adherence to protocol. METHODS: This retrospective chart review evaluated all HD patients eligible for hepatitis B vaccination in two large dialysis clinics from initiation of the hepatitis B protocol to July 2017. Recombinant hepatitis vaccine (Recombivax® HB) 40 µg was administered in a 3-dose regimen at months 0, 1, and 6 to patients with hepatitis B surface antibodies (anti-HBs) <10 mIU/mL. A repeat series was given if anti-HBs levels remained below 10 mIU/mL after the first series. A booster dose was given if anti-HBs titers fell below 10 mIU/mL after initial response to a second series vaccination. FINDINGS: Of 411 patients at the two HD centers, 142 patients received hepatitis B vaccination with a total of 168 vaccine courses given, series 1: n = 86, series 2: n = 60 and booster: n = 22. Response rates to vaccination were 61.4%, 58.3%, and 81.8%, respectively. In univariate analysis, adherence to protocol significantly affected response rate (P = 0.035). A multivariate analysis assessing response rates to series 1, 2 or booster confirmed that adherence was a significant risk factor (OR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.4-3.4; P = 0.0005). DISCUSSION: This was the first study to examine adherence to regimen and identified adherence as an important predictor of vaccine response. Adherence is one of the few modifiable risk factors that can be optimized in an effort to improve response to hepatitis B vaccination.

Multi-intervention management of calcific uremic arteriolopathy in 24 patients.

BACKGROUND: Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA), also known as calciphylaxis, is a rare but life-threatening condition predominately occurring in patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. In the absence of randomized clinical trials to guide management, clinicians must rely on observational data. We have previously reported the outcomes of our multi-intervention management in seven patients and now present a larger series of patients with extended follow-up. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with CUA at a single academic center between 2008 and 2017. We identified 24 patients including 13 hemodialysis, 8 peritoneal dialysis and 3 predialysis Stage 5 chronic kidney disease patients. RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis was 60.5 years (range 35-83) and mean follow-up 30.5 months (range <1-99). Patients were predominately female (71%) and Caucasian (83%) with diabetes mellitus diagnosed in 16 of 24 patients. Fifteen of 24 patients had ulcerating lesions suggestive of advanced disease and 20 of 24 had extensive involvement (bilateral disease or lesion size >5 cm). Treatment consisted of intensive hemodialysis (>20 h per week), sodium thiosulfate, wound care, analgesics and discontinuation of trigger medications including warfarin. Hyperbaric oxygen, cinacalcet, bisphosphonates and vitamin K were used in some cases. Overall 1 year mortality was 41% (9/22) and overall mortality at the end of follow-up was 64% (14/24). Cause of death was felt to be attributable to CUA in only four cases (16.7%). Complete or partial resolution of lesions occurred in 17 of 24 patients. One patient had recurrence of CUA 20 months after initial diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although mortality remains high in this group, direct CUA-attributable mortality is lower than historic reports. We conclude that a multi-intervention approach can be successful in treating a group of patients with severe CUA lesions.

Comparison of hypoalbuminemia-corrected serum calcium using BCP albumin assay to ionized calcium and impact on prescribing in hemodialysis patients
.

BACKGROUND: Albumin-corrected calcium (cCa) is recommended over ionized calcium (iCa) in hemodialysis (HD) patients per the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes position statements due to cost and feasibility. Two common albumin assays, bromocresol green (BCG) and bromocresol purple (BCP), produce differing results in uremic patients. All previous studies compared iCa to cCa from a BCG assay. This study, using the BCP assay, aimed to compare cCa and total calcium, respectively, to iCa. We also sought to assess phosphate binders and dialysis prescribing patterns following abnormal calcium measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 122 stable chronic HD patients with iCa, serum calcium, and albumin measured together throughout 6 blood work periods for a total of 338 sets of comparison values. Payne and Jain calcium correction equations were used. Prescription changes within 2 weeks of abnormal iCa values were recorded. RESULTS: Mean iCa, cCa, and total calcium were 1.17 ± 0.08, 2.37 ± 0.16, and 2.28 ± 0.15 mmol/L, respectively. Total calcium and cCa compared to iCa had κ-coefficients of 0.19 and 0.08, respectively, for hypocalcemia, 0.19 and -0.02 for normocalcemia and 0.59 and 0.46 for hypercalcemia. 21 interventions were made in hypocalcemic patients using iCa as reference; however, if total or corrected calcium values were used, only 8 and 5 interventions, respectively, would result. CONCLUSION: When BCP assay is used, conventional correction equations should not be utilized in hemodialysis patients; uncorrected serum calcium has a better predictive value.
.

Gabapentin for uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patients: a qualitative systematic review.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Uremic pruritus (UP) is a common discomfort of dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease. Some studies suggest a neuropathic cause of UP. Gabapentin, an anticonvulsant, has shown promising results as an emerging drug to treat this condition. OBJECTIVE: An updated qualitative systematic review was conducted to evaluate its efficacy and safety in hemodialysis patients. SOURCE OF INFORMATION: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar through June 2015 were used as sources of information. PATIENTS: Patients are adult hemodialysis patients receiving gabapentin for UP. METHODS: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, observational studies, open-label studies, and retrospective studies were included. Case series and case reports were excluded. All descriptions and data were extracted independently by two authors. RESULTS: Seven studies evaluating gabapentin with a total of 179 patients were included. Most patients were refractory to antihistamines and topical emollients. Statistically significant favorable outcomes on pruritus scores were found in six studies. Five studies evaluated antipruritic efficacy based on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), and improvements in the range of an absolute decrease of 5.7 to 9.4 points from baseline were achieved on average by 3-8 weeks of treatment. Side effects are common with six studies reporting at least 26 incidences of side effects such as somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue. A total of four patients reportedly discontinued gabapentin due to intolerability. LIMITATIONS: Our review is limited by the inclusion of generally small, lower quality studies that lacked comparator groups or were open-label studies. Since the first two randomized controlled trials were published, no further high-quality studies have been conducted. IMPLICATIONS: Our review supports a trial of gabapentin for the management of UP in hemodialysis patients refractory to antihistamines and/or emollients. The results should be interpreted cautiously due to the lower quality of included studies. We recommend a starting dose of 100 mg orally after hemodialysis to minimize adverse events in this population.

MISE EN CONTEXTE: Le prurit urémique est un symptôme clinique fréquemment associé à l'insuffisance rénale chronique et des études suggèrent qu'il serait d'origine neuropathique. Un anticonvulsivant, la gabapentine, a démontré des résultats prometteurs et pourrait s'avérer la pharmacothérapie d'avenir pour aider à soulager ce symptôme. OBJECTIF DE LA REVUE: Cette revue visait à démontrer l'innocuité de la gabapentine et à évaluer son efficacité dans le traitement du prurit urémique chez les patients dialysés. PARTICIPANTS: Il s'agit de patients dialysés adultes recevant de la gabapentine pour le soulagement du prurit urémique associé à leur état. MÉTHODE ET SOURCES: Cette étude systématique a été réalisée par le passage en revue des bases de données sur Ovid MEDLINE et EMBASE ainsi que par la consultation du Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, du site internet Clinitrials.gov et de Google Scholar jusqu'en juin 2015. La revue inclut tous les essais cliniques randomisés et quasi randomisés, les études observationnelles, les études ouvertes et les études rétrospectives répertoriées dans les sources susmentionnées. Toutes les descriptions et les données utilisées dans cette revue ont été recueillies par deux des auteurs, de façon indépendante. Les rapports de cas ainsi que les séries de cas relevés dans les sources consultées n'ont pas été retenus. RÉSULTATS: La revue porte sur un total de 179 patients répartis dans sept études traitant de l'effet de la gabapentine pour le traitement du prurit urémique. La plupart des patients suivaient ce traitement à la suite de l'échec des traitements par les antihistaminiques et les émollients. Des résultats positifs et statistiquement significatifs ont été répertoriés dans six des sept études passées en revue. Une échelle visuelle analogique en 10 points a servi pour l'évaluation de l'efficacité antiprurigineuse de la gabapentine dans cinq des sept études. Une baisse absolue de la sévérité du prurit allant de 5,7 à 9,4 points a été notée par rapport aux valeurs initiales, et ce pour une période moyenne de traitement de 3 à 8 semaines. En ce qui concerne les effets secondaires fréquemment associés à un traitement à la gabapentine (somnolence, étourdissement ou asthénie), ils ont été rapportés à 26 reprises parmi six des sept études révisées. De plus, quatre patients ont dû cesser la prise de gabapentine en raison d'une intolérance au médicament. LIMITES DE L'ÉTUDE: La présente revue repose sur des données recueillies à partir de la consultation d'un nombre restreint d'études. La majorité des études incluses dans la revue n'étaient pas de grande envergure et s'avéraient peu rigoureuses au plan scientifique : certaines ne comportant pas de groupe comparateur, d'autres consistant en des études ouvertes. Parmi les sept études passées en revue, seuls deux essais cliniques randomisés avaient été publiés et aucune autre étude rigoureuse n'a été réalisée depuis. CONSÉQUENCES: Cette revue recommande un essai de gabapentine pour soulager le prurit urémique chez les patients dialysés qui ne répondent pas aux traitements par les antihistaminiques et les émollients. Toutefois, l'interprétation des résultats doit être faite avec prudence en raison du manque de rigueur associé à certains types d'études incluses dans la revue. Nous suggérons une dose initiale de 100 mg de gabapentine, administrée par voie orale après la séance d'hémodialyse, afin de prévenir les effets secondaires du médicament dans cette population.

Best possible medication history for hemodialysis patients obtained by a pharmacy technician.

BACKGROUND: Outpatients undergoing hemodialysis are at high risk for adverse drug events. Limited resources make it challenging for pharmacists to routinely obtain a best possible medication history (BPMH). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine whether, for patients undergoing hemodialysis, a pharmacy technician has the skills to obtain a BPMH that would allow a pharmacist to identify drug-related problems. The secondary objectives were to determine the number and types of medication discrepancies and drug-related problems identified and the time required by the technician to complete the BPMH. METHODS: All patients treated in the hemodialysis unit during the study period were included, except for those who required an interpreter or were unable to participate in an in-person interview. A single technician was taught how to interview patients according to a structured format. For each patient, the technician's BMPH was verified by a pharmacist. The agreement rate between technician and pharmacists was determined, along with the number and types of discrepancies and drug-related problems identified. RESULTS: The technician interviewed 99 patients. Of the 1334 medication orders reviewed, the technician and pharmacists agreed on all but 15 (agreement rate 98.9%). A total of 358 medication discrepancies were noted for 93 patients (3.8 discrepancies per patient). Of these, 210 (59%) were undocumented intentional discrepancies, and 148 (41%) were unintentional discrepancies (most commonly errors of commission). Of the 135 drug-related problems identified, the majority involved dosing problems or nonadherence. The technician required an average of 17 min for each interview. CONCLUSION: An adequately trained technician was capable of interviewing patients to create a BPMH. A variety of medication discrepancies and drug-related problems were identified. Generation of a BPMH by a technician is a useful approach allowing pharmacists to identify drug-related problems.