Exercise maintains bone density at spine and hip EFOPS: a 3-year longitudinal study in early postmenopausal women.

It is an important aim in the prevention of osteoporosis to stop or decelerate bone loss during the early postmenopausal years. Here we report on results of the 3-year EFOPS exercise trial in osteopenic women. The exercise strategy emphasized low-volume high-resistance strength training and high-impact aerobics. Forty-eight fully compliant women (55.1+/-3.3 years) with no medication or illness affecting bone metabolism participated in the exercise group (EG); 30 women (55.5+/-3.0 years) served as non-training controls (CG). At baseline there were no significant between-group differences with respect to physical fitness, bone mineral density, pain and nutritional status. The training consisted of two group training and two home training sessions per week. The study participants of both groups were individually supplemented with calcium and vitamin D (cholecalciferol). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DXA at the lumbar spine, proximal femur and distal forearm and by QCT at the lumbar spine. Speed of sound and broadband ultrasound attenuation were determined at the calcaneus by quantitative ultrasound (QUS). Pain frequency and intensity at different skeletal sites were assessed via questionnaire. After 38 months, the following within-group changes were measured: DXA lumbar spine, EG: 0.8% n.s.; CG: -3.3% P<0.001; QCT trabecular ROI, EG: 1.1% n.s; CG: -7.7% P<0.001; QCT cortical ROI, EG: 5.3% P<0.001; CG: -2.6% P<0.001; DXA total hip: EG: -0.2% n.s; CG -1.9%, P<0.001; DXA distal forearm, EG: -2.8% P<0.001; CG: -3.8% P<0.001; BUA, EG: -0.3% n.s; CG -5.4% P<0.001; SOS, EG: 0.3% n.s; CG -1.0% P<0.001. At year 3 between-group differences relative to the exercise group were: DXA lumbar spine: 4.1% P<0.001; QCT trabecular ROI: 8.8% P<0.001; QCT cortical ROI: 7.9% P<0.001; DXA total hip: 2.1%, P<0.001; DXA distal forearm: 1.0% n.s.; BUA: 5.8% P<0.05; SOS: 1.3% P<0.001. Pain frequency and intensity in the spine significantly decreased in the exercise group and increased in the control group, while no between-group differences were detected in the main joints. In summary, over a period of 3 years our low-volume/high-intensity exercise program was successful to maintain bone mineral density at the spine, hip and calcaneus, but not at the forearm.

Power training is more effective than strength training for maintaining bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Physical exercise has a favorable impact on bones, but optimum training strategies are still under discussion. In this study, we compared the effect of slow and fast resistance exercises on various osteodensitometric parameters. Fifty-three postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to a strength training (ST) or a power training group (PT). Both groups carried out a progressive resistance training, a gymnastics session, and a home training over a period of 12 mo. During the resistance training, the ST group used slow and the PT group fast movements; otherwise there were no training differences. All subjects were supplemented with Ca and vitamin D. At baseline and after 12 mo, bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and distal forearm by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. We also measured anthropometric data and maximum static strength. Frequency and grade of pain were assessed by questionnaire. After 12 mo, significant between-group differences were observed for BMD at the lumbar spine (P < 0.05) and the total hip (P < 0.05). Whereas the PT group maintained BMD at the spine (+0.7 +/- 2.1%, not significant) and the total hip (0.0 +/- 1.7%, not significant), the ST group lost significantly at both sites (spine: -0.9 +/- 1.9%; P < 0.05; total hip: -1.2 +/- 1.5%; P < 0.01). No significant between-group differences were observed for anthropometric data, maximum strength, BMD of the forearm, or frequency and grade of pain. These findings suggest that power training is more effective than strength training in reducing bone loss in postmenopausal women.

Laparoscopic Janeway gastrostomy utilizing an endoscopic stapling device.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) though generally considered the method of choice, is not suitable for all patients requiring gastrostomies. Previously the only alternative was open gastrostomy. With the recent growth and development of laparoscopic instrumentation new less invasive procedures have been developed. We present a new method of performing a Janeway gastrostomy using an endoscopic stapling device, and discuss some of its theoretical and practical usage in selected patients in reference to the literature on PEGs and open gastrostomies.