SADMFR guidelines for the use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/ Digital Volume Tomography.

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has been introduced in 1998. This radiological imaging procedure has been provided for dentistry and is comparable to computed tomography (CT) in medicine. It is expected that CBCT will have the same success in dental diagnostic imaging as computed tomography had in medicine. Just as CT is responsible for a significant rise in radiation dose to the population from medical X-ray diagnostics, CBCT studies will be accompanied by a significant increase of the dose to our patients by dentistry. Because of the growing concern for an uncritical and consequently rapidly increasing use of CBCT the Swiss Society of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology convened a first consensus conference in 2011 to formulate indications for CBCT, which can be used as guidelines. In this meeting, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthodontics and temporomandibular joint disorders and diseases were treated and the most important and most experienced users of DVT in these areas were asked to participate. In general, a highly restrictive use of CBCT is required. Justifying main criterion for CBCT application is that additional, therapy-relevant information is expected that should lead to a significant benefit in patient care. All users of CBCT should have completed a structured, high-level training, just like that offered by the Swiss Society of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology.

Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1--analysis of dentate sites.

This retrospective radiographic study analyzed the dimensions of the alveolar bone in the posterior dentate mandible based on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. A total of 56 CBCT images met the inclusion criteria, resulting in a sample size of 122 cross sections showing posterior mandibular teeth (premolars and molars). The thickness of the buccal and lingual bone walls was measured at two locations: 4 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction (measurement point 1, MP1) and at the middle of the root (measurement point 2, MP2). Further, alveolar bone width was assessed at the level of the most coronal buccal bone detectable (alveolar bone width 1, BW1) and at the superior border of the mandibular canal (alveolar bone width 2, BW2). The vertical distance between the two as well as the presence of a lingual undercut were also analyzed. There was a steady increase in buccal bone wall thickness from the first premolar to the second molar at both MP1 and MP2. BW1 at the level of the premolars was significantly thinner than that for molars. Alveolar bone height was constant for all teeth examined. For the selection of an appropriate postextraction treatment approach, analysis of the alveolar bone dimensions at the tooth to be extracted by means of CBCT can offer valuable information concerning bone volume and morphology at the future implant site.

Cone beam computed tomography in mandibular molars referred for apical surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to compare conventional intraoral periapical radiographs (PA) with limited cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for evaluation of mandibular molars prior to apical surgery. The apical extent and homogeneity of the root canal fillings (RCF) as well as the number of root canals were examined. METHODS: 38 molars with 75 roots were included in the study. The apical extent and homogeneity of the RCFs as well as the presence of root canal posts or screws were examined on sagittal CBCT slices and on the PAs. The number of root canals was determined on sagittal CBCT slices and the PAs. The mesial and the distal roots were examined separately. RESULTS: Considerably more root canals were found on the CBCT slices compared to the PAs. The homogeneity and the extent of the RCFs as well as the presence of root canal posts or screws seem subjectively easier to determine on the PAs. CONCLUSION: In mandibular molars, because of the better discrimination of root canal anatomy we recommend a CBCT scan prior to apical surgery.

Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam computed tomography in mandibular molars for analysis of anatomical landmarks before apical surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the detectability and dimensions of periapical lesions, the relationship of the mandibular canal to the roots of the respective teeth, and the dimension of the buccal bone by using limited cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in comparison to conventional periapical (PA) radiographs for evaluation of mandibular molars before apical surgery. METHODS: The study comprised 38 molars with 75 roots. The type of PA lesion as diagnosed on PA radiographs was compared with the type of lesion seen on sagittal and coronal CBCT sections. The distances of the apices of the first mandibular molars and basal border of the PA lesion to the coronal lining of the mandibular canal were assessed with PA radiographs and corresponding sagittal and coronal CBCT images. Furthermore, coronal CBCT images were used to measure the distance from the apices to the buccal bone surface and the corresponding width of the cortical bone plate. RESULTS: Of 58 detected PA lesions, 15 (25.9%) lesions diagnosed with sagittal CBCT slices were missed with PA radiography. The distance between the apices and the upper border of the mandibular canal was only measurable in 24 of 68 radiographs (35.3%) by using PA images. The cortical bone wall had a mean thickness of 1.7 mm, whereas the total buccal bone wall (cortical and spongious) measured 5.3 mm on average. CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights the advantages of using limited CBCT for treatment planning in mandibular molars before apical surgery.