Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
Avian Dis ; 63(1): 17-23, 2019 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31251515

ABSTRACT

We have examined a variety of sampling strategies for detecting pathogens in turkey flocks undergoing infections with low pathogenicity avian influenza virus (LPAIV). We found that viral RNA was widely distributed in the barn environment of turkey flocks undergoing an active LPAIV infection and was in both water and drinker biofilm samples. Viral RNA was concentrated in drinker biofilm and sediment and was detectable using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RRT-PCR) and by virus isolation. Drinker biofilm sample results correlated with concurrently collected oropharyngeal (OP) sample results from flocks on a farm with LPAI in which the two sampling strategies were directly compared. To evaluate the utility of biofilm sampling for the detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV), biofilm and OP swabs from mortality pools were collected daily from negative turkey flocks on an HPAI-positive premise. The biofilm swabs were positive 1-2 days prior to positives appearing in the OP sample pools. The drinker biofilm sampling strategy overcame the difficulty of finding a subclinical infectious bird in a population by collecting material from a large number of individuals and testing a sample in which a positive signal persists for several days to weeks. The sampling method is convenient for use in turkey barns and has been reliably used in both active and passive surveillance programs for LPAIV and HPAIV using RRT-PCR.


Muestreo ambiental para el virus de influenza A en casetas de pavos. Se han examinado una variedad de estrategias de muestreo para detectar patógenos en parvadas de pavos que sufren infecciones con el virus de la influenza aviar de baja patogenicidad (con las siglas en inglés LPAIV). Se encontró que el ARN viral se distribuyó ampliamente en el ambiente de las casetas con parvadas de pavos con infección activa por el virus de la influenza aviar de baja patogenicidad y se determinó tanto en muestras de agua como en muestras de la biopelícula de bebederos. El ARN viral se concentró en la biopelícula y en el sedimento de bebederos y se detectó mediante transcripción reversa y reacción en cadena de la polimerasa en tiempo real (RRT-PCR) y mediante el aislamiento del virus. Los resultados de la muestra de la biopelícula del bebedero se correlacionaron con los resultados de la muestra orofaríngea (OP) colectada de forma simultánea de parvadas en una granja con influenza aviar de baja patogenicidad en las que se compararon directamente las dos estrategias de muestreo. Para evaluar la utilidad del muestreo de la biopelícula para la detección del virus de la influenza aviar altamente patógena (HPAIV), se recolectaron diariamente biopelículas e hisopos orofaríngeos de grupos de mortalidad de parvadas de pavos negativas en una granja positiva para la influenza aviar de alta patogenicidad. Los hisopos de biopelículas fueron positivos de uno a dos días antes de que aparecieran resultados positivos en las muestras orofaríngeas agrupadas. La estrategia de muestreo de la biopelícula del bebedero eliminó la dificultad de encontrar un ave infectada subclínicamente en una población al recolectar material de un gran número de individuos y analizar una muestra en la que persiste una señal positiva durante varios días o semanas. El método de muestreo es adecuado para su uso en casetas de pavos y se ha utilizado de manera confiable en los programas de vigilancia activa y pasiva para el virus de influenza aviar tanto de baja como de alta patogenicidad utilizando transcripción reversa y reacción en cadena de la polimerasa en tiempo real.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Influenza A virus/isolation & purification , Influenza in Birds/virology , Poultry Diseases/virology , Turkeys , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Environmental Monitoring/instrumentation
2.
Front Microbiol ; 9: 1841, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30147682

ABSTRACT

Salmonella is one of the leading causes of human foodborne gastroenteritis in the United States. In addition, Salmonella contributes to morbidity and mortality in livestock. The control of Salmonella is an increasing problematic issue in livestock production due to lack of effective control methods and the constant adaptation of Salmonella to new management practices, which is often related to horizontal acquisition of virulence or antibiotic resistance genes. Salmonella enterica serotype Heidelberg is one of the most commonly isolated serotypes in all poultry production systems in North America. Emergence and persistence of multi-drug resistant Salmonella Heidelberg isolates further impact the poultry production and public health. We hypothesized that distinct poultry production environments affect Salmonella genomic content, and by consequence its survival and virulence abilities. This study compared the genomic composition of S. Heidelberg isolated from environmental samples (19 chicken and 12 turkey isolates) of different breeder farms (16 chicken and 8 turkey farms) in the Midwest, United States. Whole genome comparison of 31 genomes using RAST and SEED identified differences in specific sub-systems in isolates between the chicken- and turkey-associated farm environmental samples. Genes associated with the type IV secretion system (n = 12) and conjugative transfer (n = 3) were absent in turkey farm isolates compared to the chicken ones (p-value < 0.01); Further, turkey farm isolates were enriched in prophage proteins (n = 53; p-value < 0.01). Complementary studies using PHASTER showed that prophages were all Caudovirales phages and were more represented in turkey environmental isolates than the chicken isolates. This study corroborates that isolates from distinct farm environment show differences in S. Heidelberg genome content related to horizontal transfer between bacteria or through viral infections. Complementary microbiome studies of these samples would provide critical insights on sources of these variations. Overall, our findings enhance the understanding of Salmonella genome plasticity and may aid in the development of future effective management practices to control Salmonella.

3.
Front Microbiol ; 8: 2030, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29089942

ABSTRACT

Non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) remains a global pathogen that affects a wide range of animal species. We analyzed a large number of NTS isolates of different host origins, including Salmonella Heidelberg (n = 80, avian), S. Dublin (50, bovine), S. Typhimurium var 5- (n = 40, porcine), S. 4,5,12,:i:- (n = 40, porcine), S. Cerro (n = 16, bovine), and S. Montevideo (n = 14, bovine), using virulence profiling of the bcfC, mgtC, ssaC, invE, pefA, stn, sopB, and siiE virulence-associated genes, a biofilm production assay, pulsed field gel electrophoresis, and the full-length sequencing of the fimA (adhesin) and iroN (receptor) genes. We determined a key amino acid substitution, A169 (i.e., threonine changed to alanine at position 169), in the FimA protein that changed ligand affinity of FimA toward N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. This finding clearly indicates the important role of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (nsSNPs) in adhesin functionality that may impact the host tropism of NTS. This nsSNP was found in S. Heidelberg and S. Cerro isolates. Although this was not the case for the IroN receptor, the phylogeny of this receptor and different host origins of NTS isolates were positively correlated, suggesting existence of specific host immune selective pressures on this unique receptor in S. enterica. We found that pefA, a gene encoding major fimbrial subunit, was the most-segregative virulence factor. It was associated with S. Heidelberg, S. Typhimurium var 5- and S. 4,5,12,:i:- but not with the rest of NTS strains. Further, we observed a significantly higher frequency of non-biofilm producers among NTS strains that do not carry pefA (42.5%) compared to S. Heidelberg (2.5%) and S. Typhimurium var 5- (7.5%) and S. 4,5,12,:i:- (0%). This study provides new insights into the host adaptation of avian and mammalian NTS isolates that are based on the bacterial antigens FimA and IroN as well as the interrelationships between host adaptation, overall genetic relatedness, and virulence potential in these NTS isolates.

4.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 29(3): 370-375, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28430086

ABSTRACT

Salmonella is one of the most common causes of foodborne illnesses in humans in the United States, and domestic poultry is considered an important source of this pathogen. Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Heidelberg is the fourth most commonly reported Salmonella from retail meats and food animals in the United States. We assessed the genotypes and antimicrobial resistance phenotypes of Salmonella Heidelberg isolated from various chicken and turkey hatcheries and breeder farms in the Midwest. The genotypes of 33 S. Heidelberg isolates from chickens ( n = 19) and turkeys ( n = 14) were compared using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. Cluster analysis of the fingerprints showed that the majority of the chicken isolates grouped together with 87% similarity; those from turkeys clustered with 88% similarity. Similarity between chicken and turkey isolates was also high (86%). Isolates from turkeys were generally more genetically diverse than those from chickens. Antimicrobial susceptibility analysis detected resistance to sulfisoxazole (36% of the isolates), streptomycin (33%), gentamicin (27%), tetracycline (24%), ampicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (15%), cefoxitin (12%), ceftriaxone and ceftiofur (12%), and chloramphenicol (9%). None of the isolates was resistant to azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, or nalidixic acid. Although the number of the isolates was limited in our study, we conclude that S. Heidelberg isolates from the same host generally clustered together and that a considerable number of the isolates were resistant to a number of antimicrobial agents.


Subject(s)
Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Salmonella enterica/isolation & purification , Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination/pharmacology , Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination/therapeutic use , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Chickens , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/veterinary , Genotype , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Midwestern United States/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/drug therapy , Salmonella Infections, Animal/drug therapy , Salmonella enterica/drug effects , Salmonella enterica/genetics , Turkeys
5.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 29(2): 169-175, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28176609

ABSTRACT

The incursion of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) into the United States during 2014 resulted in an unprecedented foreign animal disease (FAD) event; 232 outbreaks were reported from 21 states. The disease affected 49.6 million birds and resulted in economic losses of $950 million. Minnesota is the largest turkey-producing state, accounting for 18% of U.S. turkey production. Areas with concentrated numbers of turkeys in Minnesota were the epicenter of the outbreak. The first case was presumptively diagnosed in the last week of February 2015 at the Minnesota Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (MVDL) and confirmed as HPAI H5N2 at the National Veterinary Services Laboratories on March 4, 2015. A total of 110 farms were affected in Minnesota, and the MVDL tested >17,000 samples from March to July 2015. Normal service was maintained to other clients of the laboratory during this major FAD event, but challenges were encountered with communications, staff burnout and fatigue, training requirements of volunteer technical staff, test kit validation, and management of specific pathogen-free egg requirements.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Influenza A Virus, H5N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Turkeys , Animals , Influenza in Birds/virology , Laboratories/organization & administration , Minnesota/epidemiology , Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms , Veterinary Medicine
6.
Avian Dis ; 59(4): 512-7, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26629625

ABSTRACT

Subtype H3 influenza A viruses (IAVs) are abundant in wild waterfowl and also infect humans, pigs, horses, dogs, and seals. In Minnesota, turkeys are important and frequent hosts of IAV from wild waterfowl and from pigs. Over 48 yr of surveillance history, 11 hemagglutinin (HA) subtypes of IAV from waterfowl, as well as two HA subtypes from swine, H1 and H3, have infected turkeys in Minnesota. However, there have only been two cases of avian-origin H3 IAV infections in turkeys during this 48-yr period. The first avian-origin IAV infection was detected in seven breeder and commercial flocks in 1982 and was caused by a mixed H3H4/N2 infection. In 2013, an avian-origin H3H9/N2 outbreak occurred in five flocks of turkeys between 15 and 56 wk of age. Phylogenetic analysis of the HA gene segment from the 2013 isolate indicated that the virus was related to a wild bird lineage H3 IAV. A meta-analysis of historical H3 infections in domesticated poultry demonstrated that avian-origin H3 infections have occurred in chickens and ducks but were rare in turkeys. H9N2 virus was subsequently selected during the egg cultivation of the 2013 H3H9/N2 mixed virus. A growth curve analysis suggested that passage 3 of A/Turkey/Minnesota/13-20710-2/2013(mixed) had a slightly lower replication rate than a similar avian-origin H3N2. The challenge studies indicated that the infectious dose of avian-origin H3N2 for turkey poults was greater than 10(6) 50% egg infective dose. Considered together, these data suggest that avian-origin H3 introductions to turkeys are rare events.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H9N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Turkeys , Animals , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Hemagglutinins, Viral/genetics , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H9N2 Subtype/genetics , Influenza in Birds/history , Influenza in Birds/virology , Minnesota/epidemiology , Phylogeny , Poultry Diseases/history , Poultry Diseases/virology , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Sequence Analysis, DNA/veterinary
7.
Vet Microbiol ; 180(3-4): 281-285, 2015 Nov 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26414999

ABSTRACT

Influenza D virus (FLUDV) was isolated from diseased pigs with respiratory disease symptoms in 2011, and since then the new virus has also been spread to cattle. Little is known about the susceptibility of other agricultural animals and poultry to FLUDV. This study was designed to determine if other farm animals such as goats, sheep, chickens, and turkey are possible hosts to this newly emerging influenza virus. 648 goat and sheep serum samples and 250 chicken and turkey serum samples were collected from 141 small ruminant and 25 poultry farms from different geographical locations in the United States and Canada. Serum samples were examined using the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay and the sheep and goat samples were further analyzed using the serum neutralization assay. Results of this study showed FLUDV antibodies were detected in 13.5% (17/126) of the sampled sheep farms, and 5.2% (29/557) of tested sheep serum samples were positive for FLUDV antibodies. For the goat results, the FLUDV antibodies were detected in 13.3% (2/15) of the sampled farms, and 8.8% (8/91) of the tested goat serum samples were positive for FLUDV antibodies. Furthermore, all tested poultry serum samples were negative for FLUDV antibodies. Our data demonstrated that sheep and goat are susceptible to FLUDV virus and multiple states in U.S. have this virus infection already in these two species. This new finding highlights a need for future surveillance of FLUDV virus in small ruminants toward better understanding both the origin and natural reservoir of this new virus.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Goats/virology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Ruminants/virology , Sheep, Domestic/virology , Thogotovirus/isolation & purification , Animals , Animals, Domestic/virology , Canada , Chickens/virology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Goat Diseases/virology , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Neutralization Tests , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/virology , Turkeys/virology , United States
8.
Avian Dis ; 56(3): 488-93, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23050464

ABSTRACT

Influenza virus infections can cause respiratory and systemic disease of variable severity and also result in economic losses for the turkey industry. Several subtypes of influenza can infect turkeys, causing diverse clinical signs. Influenza subtypes of swine origin have been diagnosed in turkey premises; however, it is not known how common these infections are nor the likely routes of transmission. We conducted a cross-sectional study to estimate the prevalence of influenza viruses and examine factors associated with infection on Minnesota turkey premises. Results from influenza diagnostic tests and turkey and pig premise location data were obtained from the Minnesota Poultry Testing Laboratory and the Minnesota Board of Animal Health, respectively, from January 2007 to September 2008. Diagnostic data from 356 premises were obtained, of which 17 premises tested positive for antibodies to influenza A virus by agar gel immunodiffusion assay and were confirmed as either H1N1 or H3N2 influenza viruses by hemagglutination and neuraminidase inhibition assays. Influenza infection status was associated with proximity to pig premises and flock size. The latter had a sparing effect on influenza status. This study suggests that H1N1 and H3N2 influenza virus infections of turkey premises in Minnesota are an uncommon event. The route of influenza virus transmission could not be determined; however, the findings suggest that airborne transmission should be considered in future studies.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype , Influenza in Birds/virology , Turkeys , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Housing, Animal , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Minnesota/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Risk Factors
9.
Avian Dis ; 56(4 Suppl): 1049-53, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23402134

ABSTRACT

A highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreak in the United States will initiate a federal emergency response effort that will consist of disease control and eradication efforts, including quarantine and movement control measures. These movement control measures will not only apply to live animals but also to animal products. However, with current egg industry "just-in-time" production practices, limited storage is available to hold eggs. As a result, stop movement orders can have significant unintended negative consequences, including severe disruptions to the food supply chain. Because stakeholders' perceptions of risk vary, waiting to initiate communication efforts until an HPAI event occurs can hinder disease control efforts, including the willingness of producers to comply with the response, and also can affect consumers' demand for the product. A public-private-academic partnership was formed to assess actual risks involved in the movement of egg industry products during an HPAI event through product specific, proactive risk assessments. The risk analysis process engaged a broad representation of stakeholders and promoted effective risk management and communication strategies before an HPAI outbreak event. This multidisciplinary team used the risk assessments in the development of the United States Department of Agriculture, Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Secure Egg Supply Plan, a comprehensive response plan that strives to maintain continuity of business. The collaborative approach that was used demonstrates how a proactive risk communication strategy that involves many different stakeholders can be valuable in the development of a foreign animal disease response plan and build working relationships, trust, and understanding.


Subject(s)
Birds , Influenza A virus/pathogenicity , Influenza in Birds/prevention & control , Interdisciplinary Communication , Agriculture , Animals , Food Industry , Government , Influenza in Birds/virology , Risk Assessment , United States
10.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis ; 11(9): 1293-7, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21612537

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The continuing epizootic of H5N1 avian influenza (AI) in Asia and subsequent zoonotic transmission has led to heightened concerns about a pandemic and the demand for improved surveillance of poultry in all sectors, including backyard poultry. We conducted a 15-month prospective study to determine the prevalence of AI in backyard poultry and extent of transmission to flock handlers. METHODS: Starting July 2007, registered poultry owners in six counties in central Wisconsin were mailed invitations to participate; household members with poultry exposure were also invited. Premises with < 1000 birds were eligible. Participants completed a baseline interview to characterize poultry exposures. Illness in flocks and flock handlers was monitored using semimonthly telephone interviews and self-report of acute influenza-like symptoms by flock handlers. Participants provided blood at baseline and at the end of the surveillance period for serology and, if ill, nasopharyngeal, eye, and throat swabs for viral testing. Blood was also collected at baseline from a convenience sample of adult poultry. RESULTS: We enrolled 87 flocks and 128 persons who had regular contact with poultry. Influenza-like symptoms were reported by 77 (65%) persons. Swabs were collected from 53 persons at 88 illness episodes. AI was not isolated, but five persons were positive for human influenza. Twenty-one participants (20%) seroconverted to at least one human influenza strain, but there were no seroconversions to AI. Blood samples from all 717 birds tested were seronegative for influenza. CONCLUSION: Despite limited biosecurity there was no evidence of AI infection in participating backyard flocks or flock handlers.


Subject(s)
Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Child , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Interviews as Topic , Middle Aged , Poultry , Prospective Studies , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Wisconsin/epidemiology , Young Adult
11.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 21(2): 240-3, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19286505

ABSTRACT

Routine serologic testing for Avian metapneumovirus (AMPV) infection of turkey flocks at slaughter is currently being used to monitor changes in the occurrence of AMPV infection in endemic areas and can also be used to detect the emergence of infection in currently unaffected areas. Because of the costs associated with false-positive results, particularly in areas that are free of AMPV infection, there is a need to obtain improved estimates of flock-level specificity (SP). The objective of this study was to estimate flock-level SP of a program to monitor AMPV infection in turkey flocks at processing using a standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A study was carried out in which 37 AMPV-free flocks from 7 Midwest operations were followed serologically. Six percent, 3%, and 0.2% of total samples tested AMPV positive at 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and at processing, respectively. Overall, flock-level SP increased as the cutoff increased and as age increased. Flock-level SP at processing was 97%, if a cutoff of 1 was used (the flock was classified as positive if at least 1 sample tested positive), and 100%, if any other cutoff was used. Administration of antibiotics (P = 0.02) and vaccination for Bordetella avium (P = 0.08) were positively associated with the probability of (false) positive test results. These findings suggest possible cross-reactions with other infections and highlight the need to consider variable diagnostic performance depending on farm conditions.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Metapneumovirus/isolation & purification , Paramyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Poultry Diseases/virology , Turkeys , Animals , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Paramyxoviridae Infections/blood , Paramyxoviridae Infections/virology , Poultry Diseases/diagnosis , Sensitivity and Specificity
12.
Clin Infect Dis ; 43(2): 210-3, 2006 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16779749

ABSTRACT

We report a concurrent increase in the number of isolates of Salmonella enterica serotype Newport and the rate of multidrug resistance in S. Newport isolates from animal and human populations in Minnesota. Antimicrobial susceptibility and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis demonstrated heterogeneity of isolates and showed that 1 pulsed-field gel electrophoresis cluster contained most of the multidrug-resistant isolates with a resistance pattern and most class 1 integron isolates, implying the clonal origin of the isolates.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Salmonella Infections/microbiology , Salmonella enterica/classification , Animals , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Cattle , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/microbiology , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Humans , Integrons , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Minnesota/epidemiology , Salmonella enterica/isolation & purification
13.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 17(1): 16-22, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15690946

ABSTRACT

Five different antigens were evaluated in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests for the detection of avian pneumovirus (APV) antibodies. Two of the 5 antigens were prepared from recent APV isolates from Minnesota. The 2 older isolates were passage 63 of a strain currently used as a live, attenuated vaccine and a Colorado strain isolated for the first time in the United States and currently used in an ELISA test. The fifth antigen is based on an APV recombinant N-protein. Basic parameters and positive-negative threshold of the assays were established for all 5 antigens on the basis of data obtained by testing 46 known negative and 46 known positive serum samples. Subsequently, 449 field samples were tested by all 5 ELISAs. The optical density difference (ODD) was calculated by subtracting optical density of the sample in the negative antigen well from that in the positive antigen well. In the current ELISA test based on the Colorado strain, an ODD of 0.2 is considered to be the cutoff value to classify samples as negative or positive. In this study, however, use of different cutoffs, based on ODD of negative control plus 3 SD or values estimated from Receiver operating characteristic analysis, was considered to be more appropriate for the various antigens used. Overall person-to-person and day-to-day variability was found to be large for all tests using either ODD or sample to positive ratio to report results. In addition, results suggest that antigenicity of the APV isolates in the United States has not changed between 1997 and 2000.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Metapneumovirus/immunology , Animals , False Positive Reactions , Paramyxoviridae Infections/diagnosis , Paramyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Poultry Diseases/diagnosis , Poultry Diseases/virology , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Turkeys
14.
Am J Vet Res ; 65(5): 538-43, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15141870

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare molecular typing methods for the differentiation of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis phage type (PT) 4 isolates that allowed for the determination of their genetic relatedness. SAMPLE POPULATION: 27 Salmonella Enteritidis PT 4 strains isolated in the United States and Europe. PROCEDURE: Several molecular typing methods were performed to assess their ability to genetically differentiate among Salmonella Enteritidis PT 4 isolates. Results of pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), repetitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism of 16S rRNA, and antimicrobial susceptibility were evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with results for other techniques, results for the RAPD typing method with the RAPD1 primer reveal that it was the most discriminatory fingerprinting technique, and it allowed us to cluster Salmonella Enteritidis PT 4 isolates on the basis of their genetic similarity. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study revealed the value of RAPD with the RAPD1 primer as a tool for epidemiologic investigations of Salmonella Enteritidis PT 4. It can be used in conjunction with PFGE and phage typing to determine the genetic relatedness of Salmonella Enteritidis isolates involved in outbreaks of disease. A reliable and highly discriminatory method for epidemiologic investigations is critical to allow investigators to identify the source of infections and consequently prevent the spread of Salmonella Enteritidis PT 4.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Typing Techniques/methods , Bacteriophage T4/genetics , Poultry/microbiology , Salmonella enteritidis/classification , Salmonella enteritidis/genetics , Animals , Base Sequence , Cluster Analysis , DNA Primers , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Molecular Sequence Data , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique , Salmonella enteritidis/virology , Sequence Analysis, DNA
15.
Avian Dis ; 47(3): 700-6, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14562899

ABSTRACT

Avian pneumovirus (APV) causes respiratory tract infection in turkeys and was first seen in the United States in Colorado in late 1996. In early 1997, the disease was recognized in Minnesota and caused estimated losses of up to 15 million dollars per year. This virus has not been reported in the other turkey producing states. We here report the seroprevalence of APV in Minnesota from August 1998 to July 2002. The average rate of seroprevalence has been 36.3% (range = 14.2%-64.8%). A seasonal bias was observed, with peak incidences in the fall and spring. A higher rate of seropositivity was observed in counties with the highest concentration of turkeys.


Subject(s)
Metapneumovirus/immunology , Paramyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Turkeys , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Female , Incidence , Male , Minnesota/epidemiology , Paramyxoviridae Infections/epidemiology , Population Density , Poultry Diseases/blood , Seasons , Seroepidemiologic Studies
16.
J Clin Microbiol ; 41(8): 3579-83, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12904358

ABSTRACT

The first cases of infection caused by avian metapneumoviruses (aMPVs) were described in turkeys with respiratory disease in South Africa during 1978. The causative agent was isolated and identified as a pneumovirus in 1986. aMPVs have been detected in domestic nonpoultry species in Europe, but tests for the detection of these viruses are not available in the United States. To begin to understand the potential role of domestic ducks and geese and wild waterfowl in the epidemiology of aMPV, we have developed and evaluated a blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (bELISA) for the detection of aMPV type C (aMPV-C)-specific antibodies. This assay method overcomes the species-specific platform of indirect ELISAs to allow detection of aMPV-C-specific antibodies from potentially any avian species. The bELISA was initially tested with experimental turkey serum samples, and the results were found to correlate with those of virus neutralization assays and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). One thousand serum samples from turkey flocks in Minnesota were evaluated by our bELISA, and the level of agreement of the results of the bELISA and those of the iELISA was 94.9%. In addition, we were able to show that the bELISA could detect aMPV-C-specific antibodies from experimentally infected ducks, indicating its usefulness for the screening of serum samples from multiple avian species. This is the first diagnostic assay for the detection of aMPV-C-specific antibodies from multiple avian species in the United States.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Metapneumovirus , Metapneumovirus/isolation & purification , Paramyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Poultry Diseases/virology , Animals , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/standards , Metapneumovirus/classification , Paramyxoviridae Infections/epidemiology , Paramyxoviridae Infections/virology , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , South Africa/epidemiology
17.
J Clin Microbiol ; 40(5): 1687-93, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11980943

ABSTRACT

The avian pneumovirus (APV) outbreak in the United States is concentrated in the north-central region, particularly in Minnesota, where more outbreaks in commercial turkeys occur in the spring (April to May) and autumn (October to December). Comparison of the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of nucleoprotein (N), phosphoprotein (P), matrix (M), fusion (F), and second matrix (M2) genes of 15 U.S. APV strains isolated between 1996 and 1999 revealed between 89 and 94% nucleotide sequence identity and 81 to 95% amino acid sequence identity. In contrast, genes from U.S. viruses had 41 to 77% nucleotide sequence identity and 52 to 78% predicted amino acid sequence identity with European subgroup A or B viruses, confirming that U.S. viruses belonged to a separate subgroup. Of the five proteins analyzed in U.S. viruses, P was the most variable (81% amino acid sequence identity) and N was the most conserved (95% amino acid sequence identity). Phylogenetic comparison of subgroups A, B, and C viruses indicated that A and B viruses were more closely related to each other than either A or B viruses were to C viruses.


Subject(s)
Pneumovirus Infections/veterinary , Pneumovirus/isolation & purification , Poultry Diseases/virology , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Colorado/epidemiology , DNA Primers , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Minnesota/epidemiology , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , Pneumovirus/classification , Pneumovirus/genetics , Pneumovirus Infections/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Seasons , Sequence Alignment , Sequence Homology, Amino Acid , Species Specificity , Turkeys , United States/epidemiology , Viral Proteins/chemistry , Viral Proteins/genetics
18.
Anim Health Res Rev ; 3(2): 107-17, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12665110

ABSTRACT

Avian pneumovirus (APV; officially known as turkey rhinotracheitis virus) is an emergent pathogen of birds in the USA that results in upper respiratory tract disease in turkeys. Six years after the first outbreak in the USA, the disease continues to ravage turkey flocks, primarily in the state of Minnesota. From 1997 to 2000, the industry recorded losses estimated at 15 million US dollars per annum. Researchers have developed sensitive diagnostic techniques, including the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. which, when used together, are highly sensitive in detecting APV outbreaks in commercial turkey flocks. Phylogenetic analysis of the nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequence of 15 US viruses isolated between 1996 and 2000 demonstrated that the US viruses are relatively homogenous but different from the European APV subgroups A and B, resulting in the classification of US isolates into subgroup C. Infectious APV was isolated from sentinel waterfowls placed close to an infected commercial turkey farm and from wild Canada geese captured in Minnesota, suggesting that free-ranging birds may be involved in the spread of APV. Current efforts to prevent and control the infection include improving management and biosecurity practices and developing attenuated live and deletion mutant vaccines capable of conferring protection.


Subject(s)
Metapneumovirus/classification , Paramyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Poultry Diseases/virology , Turkeys , Animals , Animals, Domestic , Animals, Wild , Bacterial Typing Techniques/veterinary , Metapneumovirus/genetics , Metapneumovirus/immunology , Minnesota/epidemiology , Paramyxoviridae Infections/epidemiology , Paramyxoviridae Infections/transmission , Paramyxoviridae Infections/virology , Phylogeny , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/transmission , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...