Influence of methotrexate on infliximab pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in ankylosing spondylitis.

AIMS: Infliximab, an anti-tumour necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody, has profoundly modified the treatment of several inflammatory diseases. The objective was to assess the influence of methotrexate on the variability of infliximab pharmacokinetics and concentration-effect relationship in axial ankylosing spondylitis (AAS) patients. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with AAS were included in a prospective study. They were treated by infliximab 5 mg kg⁻¹ infusions at weeks 0, 2, 6, 12 and 18. Infliximab concentrations were measured before, and 2 and 4 h after each infusion, and at each intermediate visit (weeks 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10 and 14). Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) was measured at each visit. Infliximab pharmacokinetics was described using a two-compartment model with first-order distribution and elimination constants. A population approach was used. Infliximab pharmacodynamics was described using the area under the BASDAI curve. RESULTS: A total of 507 blood samples and 329 BASDAI measurements were collected. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained (interindividual coefficient of variation): volumes of distribution for the central compartment = 2.4 l (9.6%) and peripheral compartment = 1.8 l (26%), systemic clearance = 0.23 l day⁻¹ (22%) and intercompartment clearance = 2.3 l day⁻¹. Methotrexate influenced neither pharmacokinetic nor BASDAI variability. CONCLUSIONS: Using the present dosage, the clinical efficacy of infliximab is only weakly influenced by its serum concentrations. The results do not support the combination of methotrexate with infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab in spondyloarthritis: an observational open-label study.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds to human tumor necrosis factor alpha and which is approved for refractory spondyloarthritis (SpA). Individual adjustment of infliximab dosage may help to improve the therapeutic response in SpA. We investigated whether a knowledge of infliximab serum concentration modifies physician decision and improves the control of disease activity in SpA. METHODS: Thirty-two patients routinely treated with infliximab were included in an observational open-label study. On visit 1 (V1), according to disease activity, a preliminary therapeutic decision was selected among 4 therapeutic options (ie, decrease, increase, maintain the dosage of infliximab, or switch over for another treatment), and a blood sample was collected to measure infliximab trough serum concentration. The final therapeutic decision, based on both disease activity and infliximab serum concentration assessed at V1, was applied at the following infusion (V2). Clinical and biological evaluations were performed at V3 and V4 and compared with those at V1. RESULTS: The measurement of infliximab trough concentration modified the therapeutic decision for 10 patients (31%). For both patients with increased or decreased infliximab dosage at V2, median Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) was similar at V3 or V4 as compared with that at V1. However, a trend for an inverse relationship between infliximab serum concentrations and BASDAI was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of infliximab trough concentration modified the therapeutic decision for SpA patients with predominantly axial symptoms but did not improve the control of disease activity as estimated by the BASDAI.

Infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis: alone or in combination with methotrexate? A pharmacokinetic comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Methotrexate (MTX) has been shown to modify infliximab pharmacokinetics in rheumatoid arthritis. However, its combination with infliximab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is not recommended. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of MTX on infliximab exposure in patients with AS. METHODS: Patients with AS patients who had predominantly axial symptoms were randomised to receive infliximab alone (infusions of 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, 6, 12 and 18) or infliximab combined with MTX (10 mg/week). Infliximab concentrations were measured before and 2 hours after each infusion and at 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 14 and 18 weeks. We estimated individual cumulative area under the concentration versus time curves (AUC) for infliximab concentration between baseline and week 18 (AUC(0-18)). Clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed at each visit. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score was the primary end point for clinical response. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included (infliximab group: n = 12, infliximab + MTX group: n = 14), and 507 serum samples were available for measurement of infliximab concentration. The two groups did not differ with regard to AUC(0-18) or evolution of BASDAI scores and biomarkers of inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of MTX and infliximab does not increase the exposure to infliximab over infliximab alone in patients with AS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00507403.

Antibodies toward infliximab are associated with low infliximab concentration at treatment initiation and poor infliximab maintenance in rheumatic diseases.

INTRODUCTION: A proportion of patients receiving infliximab have antibodies toward infliximab (ATI), which are associated with increased risk of infusion reaction and reduced response to treatment. We studied the association of infliximab concentration at treatment initiation and development of ATI as well as the association of the presence of ATI and maintenance of infliximab. METHODS: All patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA) receiving infliximab beginning in December 2005 were retrospectively followed until January 2009 or until infliximab discontinuation. Trough serum infliximab and ATI concentrations were measured at each visit. The patients were separated into two groups: ATI(pos) if ATI were detected at least once during the follow-up period and ATI(neg) otherwise. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to study the association of infliximab concentration at treatment initiation and the development of ATI. Maintenance of infliximab in the two groups was studied by using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: We included 108 patients: 17 with RA and 91 with SpA. ATI were detected in 21 patients (19%). The median time to ATI detection after initiation of infliximab was 3.7 months (1.7 to 26.0 months). For both RA and SpA patients, trough infliximab concentration during the initiation period was significantly lower for ATI(pos) than ATI(neg) patients. RA patients showed maintenance of infliximab at a median of 19.5 months (5.0 to 31.0 months) and 12.0 months (2.0 to 24.0 months) for ATI(neg) and ATI(pos) groups, respectively (P = 0.08). SpA patients showed infliximab maintenance at a median of 16.0 months (3.0 to 34.0 months) and 9.5 months (3.0 to 39.0 months) for ATI(neg) and ATI(pos) groups, respectively (P = 0.20). Among SpA patients, those who were being treated concomitantly with methotrexate had a lower risk of developing ATI than patients not taking methotrexate (0 of 14 patients (0%) vs. 25 of 77 patients (32%); P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: High concentrations of infliximab during treatment initiation reduce the development of ATI, and the absence of ATI may be associated with prolonged maintenance of infliximab. Thus, trough serum infliximab concentration should be monitored early in patients with rheumatic diseases.