Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Clin Linguist Phon ; 28(6): 413-27, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24446795

ABSTRACT

This study investigates narratives of Finnish children with specific language impairment (SLI) from linguistic and pragmatic perspectives, in order to get a comprehensive overview of these children's narrative abilities. Nineteen children with SLI (mean age 6;1 years) and 19 typically developing age-matched children participated in the study. Their picture-elicited narrations were analysed for linguistic productivity and complexity, grammatical and referential accuracy, event content, the use of mental state expressions and narrative comprehension. Children with SLI showed difficulties in every aspect of narration in comparison to their peers. Only one measure of productivity, the number of communication units, did not reach statistical significance. Not only was linguistic structure fragile but also pragmatic aspects of storytelling (referencing, event content, mental state expressions and inferencing) were demanding for children with SLI. Results suggest that pragmatic aspects of narration should be taken into account more often when assessing narrative abilities of children with SLI.


Subject(s)
Child Language , Language Development Disorders/psychology , Language Development , Affect , Child , Child Development , Child, Preschool , Cognition , Emotions , Female , Finland , Humans , Language , Language Tests , Male , Narration , Speech Production Measurement
2.
Future Oncol ; 6(5): 709-16, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20465386

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 and 18 vaccines against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II (CIN2+) has been verified, but the active follow-up of studies with invasive cervical cancer or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CIN3) as primary end points are ethically not possible. Furthermore, ongoing registry-based passive follow-up studies with invasive cervical cancer as the end point will take time. MATERIALS & METHODS: To evaluate the feasibility of CIN3 as a surrogate end point, we compared high-risk (hr) HPV-associated relative risk and population attributable fraction (PAF) of CIN3 and/or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) estimated in a large serological case-cohort HPV study. Our case-cohort comprised 83 SCC and 389 CIN3 cases and a subcohort of 7862 out of 230,998 Finnish women, who at baseline were under 32 years of age and had undergone a minimum of two pregnancies within 5 years during 1983-1997. RESULTS: PAFs of the case-cohort, approach-based, serologically defined and misclassification-corrected HPV16 and hrHPV (HPV types 16, 18, 31 and 33) exposures in the SCC samples were 61% (95% CI: 18-85) and 73% (95% CI: 13-93), respectively. Considerably lower HPV16 and hrHPV PAF estimates in CIN3 of 6% (95% CI: -19-35) and 36% (95% CI: -5-65), respectively, were obtained. A meta-analysis-derived, PCR-based, hrHPV-associated relative risk estimate of 20.3 in CIN2/3+ yielded a PAF estimate for hrHPV in CIN2/3+ of 86% (90% CI: 63-95) in our study population. The former, hrHPV serology-based CIN3 PAF estimates were biased owing to low sensitivity of HPV16 and/or HPV16/18/31/33 serology, most notably in cervical cancer precursor lesions, but the latter estimate overlapped with our hrHPV serology-based cervical cancer PAF estimate. CONCLUSION: CIN3 may be a valid surrogate efficacy end point for HPV vaccination studies, but the associated causality of multiple hrHPV exposures needs to be unambigously defined.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Human papillomavirus 16 , Human papillomavirus 18 , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Prevalence , Registries , Viral Proteins , Young Adult
3.
Int J Cancer ; 119(11): 2612-9, 2006 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16991128

ABSTRACT

Vaccines against high-risk (hr) human papillomaviruses (HPVs) causing cervical cancer may soon be licensed. Thus, nature of HPV epidemics needs to be studied now. Random sampling for studies on HPV epidemiology was done from all 230,998 women belonging to the population-based Finnish Maternity Cohort and having a minimum of 2 pregnancies between 1983 and 1994. First pregnancy serum specimens were retrieved for 7,805 subjects, and were analyzed for antibodies to HPV6/11, 16 and 18 with standard ELISAs. HPV16 seroprevalence almost doubled from the 1980s to the 1990s, and the epidemic spread to new areas in 23-31 year olds, i.e. the bulk of pregnant female population in the southwest part of the country. The HPV16 epidemic in the 14-22 year olds in 1983-1988 (1961-1974 birth cohorts) and in the 23-31 year olds in 1989-1994 (1958-1971 birth cohorts) overlapped with strong clustering of HPV16 and HPV18 infections in the latter (odds ratio 8.0, 95% confidence interval 6.6-9.7). Similar clustering of HPV16 and HPV6/11 infections was not found. The epidemic and the clustering may be due to high transmission probability of the hrHPV types and increase in sexual activity of the index birth cohorts.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Seroepidemiologic Studies
4.
PLoS Med ; 3(5): e138, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16573364

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Candidate human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines have demonstrated almost 90%-100% efficacy in preventing persistent, type-specific HPV infection over 18 mo in clinical trials. If these vaccines go on to demonstrate prevention of precancerous lesions in phase III clinical trials, they will be licensed for public use in the near future. How these vaccines will be used in countries with national cervical cancer screening programmes is an important question. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We developed a transmission model of HPV 16 infection and progression to cervical cancer and calibrated it to Finnish HPV 16 seroprevalence over time. The model was used to estimate the transmission probability of the virus, to look at the effect of changes in patterns of sexual behaviour and smoking on age-specific trends in cancer incidence, and to explore the impact of HPV 16 vaccination. We estimated a high per-partnership transmission probability of HPV 16, of 0.6. The modelling analyses showed that changes in sexual behaviour and smoking accounted, in part, for the increase seen in cervical cancer incidence in 35- to 39-y-old women from 1990 to 1999. At both low (10% in opportunistic immunisation) and high (90% in a national immunisation programme) coverage of the adolescent population, vaccinating women and men had little benefit over vaccinating women alone. We estimate that vaccinating 90% of young women before sexual debut has the potential to decrease HPV type-specific (e.g., type 16) cervical cancer incidence by 91%. If older women are more likely to have persistent infections and progress to cancer, then vaccination with a duration of protection of less than 15 y could result in an older susceptible cohort and no decrease in cancer incidence. While vaccination has the potential to significantly reduce type-specific cancer incidence, its combination with screening further improves cancer prevention. CONCLUSIONS: HPV vaccination has the potential to significantly decrease HPV type-specific cervical cancer incidence. High vaccine coverage of women alone, sustained over many decades, with a long duration of vaccine-conferred protection, would have the greatest impact on type-specific cancer incidence. This level of coverage could be achieved through national coordinated programmes, with surveillance to detect cancers caused by nonvaccine oncogenic HPV types.


Subject(s)
Human papillomavirus 16/pathogenicity , Models, Theoretical , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Forecasting , Humans , Incidence , Mass Screening , Papillomavirus Infections/transmission , Population Surveillance , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Viral Vaccines
6.
J Gen Virol ; 84(Pt 8): 2105-2109, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12867641

ABSTRACT

Human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 is the major cause of cervical carcinoma, the incidence of which is decreasing in western countries. In Finland the incidence is, however, increasing in women aged <40 years, but possible underlying changes in HPV-16 epidemiology are unknown. To assess incidence trends of HPV infections, paired sera from a random sample of 8000 women with two pregnancies/sera within 5 years, taken from the serum bank of the Finnish Maternity Cohort (1983-98), were analysed for HPV-6, -11 and -16 antibodies. For 23-31-year-old women, HPV-16 incidence increased over the period 1983-97. HPV-16 seroprevalence increased from 17% in 1983-85 to 24% in 1995-97, but HPV-6 and HPV-11 prevalence was stable at 9-12% throughout the study period. Epidemic spread of the oncogenic HPV-16, but not the non-oncogenic HPV-types, throughout the 1980s and 1990s preceded an increase in the incidence of cervical carcinoma in fertile-aged Finnish women.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Papillomaviridae/classification , Papillomaviridae/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Tumor Virus Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Prevalence , Time Factors , Tumor Virus Infections/virology
7.
J Periodontol ; 73(11): 1323-30, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12479637

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The immunomodulating effects of both immunosuppressive and nifedipine medication have been associated with drug-induced gingival overgrowth. The aim of the study reported here was to evaluate the presence of macrophage subpopulations in normal human gingiva and in gingival overgrowth induced by nifedipine and immunosuppressive medication. METHODS: Gingival samples were taken from 11 nifedipine-medicated cardiac outpatients (nifedipine group), 11 triple-medicated organ-transplant recipients also taking nifedipine (immunosuppression plus nifedipine group), 12 triple-medicated organ-transplant recipients (immunosuppression group), and 20 generally healthy individuals (control group). Cryostat sections were stained with mAbs for inflammatory 27E10, reparative RM3/1, and resident 25F9 macrophages using an avidin-biotin enzyme complex method. Total numbers of mAb-labeled cells were determined in connective tissue beneath sulcular epithelium, connective tissue beneath oral epithelium, and middle connective tissue. Expression of 27E10 was determined in keratinocytes in the oral epithelium. Statistics analyses were undertaken using the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney U test, the independent samples t test, analysis of variance, and analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Greater numbers of inflammatory 27E10-positive macrophages were found in all 3 medicated groups and counting zones than in the control group except in connective tissue beneath sulcular epithelium in the immunosuppression group. The incidence of specimens expressing 27E10 antigen throughout the oral epithelium was significantly higher in the immunosuppression group (8 of 12) than in the control group (4 of 20) and the nifedipine group (2 of 11). Numbers of reparative RM3/1-positive macrophages were significantly greater in the immunosuppression group in connective tissue beneath oral epithelium than in the control group. The effect was markedly associated with degree of inflammation. Numbers of resident 25F9-positive macrophages were lower in connective tissue beneath sulcular epithelium in the immunosuppression group, and higher in middle connective tissue in the nifedipine group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the nature of drug-induced gingival overgrowth differs somewhat between immunosuppressive and nifedipine medications.


Subject(s)
Antigens, CD , Calcium Channel Blockers/adverse effects , Gingival Overgrowth/chemically induced , Gingival Overgrowth/immunology , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Macrophages/immunology , Nifedipine/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic/analysis , Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic/immunology , Case-Control Studies , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Gingiva/cytology , Gingiva/immunology , Gingival Overgrowth/pathology , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Immunophenotyping , Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex/analysis , Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Receptors, Cell Surface/analysis , Receptors, Cell Surface/immunology , Statistics, Nonparametric
8.
Cranio ; 20(3): 158-64, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12150261

ABSTRACT

The etiology of facial pain is multifactorial. Based on the results of a questionnaire included in the study of the 1966 Northern Finland Birth Cohort, performed in 1997-98, we found an association of facial pain with subjective symptoms of temporomandibular disorders (TMD), neck pain and with occlusal factors reported by 5,696 subjects. The aim of the present study was to examine these associations clinically. In the year 2000, a new inquiry was sent to the following subjects living in Oulu: 1. all subjects who had reported facial pain in the former questionnaire (n=162) (case group); and 2. to a randomly selected group of nonpain controls (n=200), group matched for gender. Those who reported willingness to participate were invited to a clinical examination. Finally, the total number of subjects was 104, including 52 (10 men, 42 women) cases and 52 (10 men, 42 women) controls. Anamnestic data were collected, and clinical stomatognathic and musculoskeletal examinations were performed, both the clinicians and the subjects being unaware of the case-control status. Anamnestically, stress was the most often reported provoking factor for facial pain. Facial pain associated significantly with reported TMD symptoms and allergies. Based on clinical findings, most of the cases were classified in the myogenous subgroup of TMD. The risk for facial pain was six-fold in subjects with clinically assessed TMD, defined as moderate (DiII) or severe (DiIII) by Helkimo's clinical dysfunction index, almost six-fold in subjects with protrusion interferences and approximately three-fold in subjects with clinically assessed tenderness of distinct fibromyalgia (FM) points in the neck. According to the adjusted logistic regression analyses, TMD had the strongest influence on facial pain, followed by protrusion interferences, anamnestically reported allergies and "other headaches". The present study shows that as well as being connected with TMD, facial pain is associated with pain and muscle tenderness in the neck area.


Subject(s)
Facial Pain/etiology , Malocclusion/complications , Neck Pain/complications , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/complications , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Female , Fibromyalgia/complications , Finland , Headache/complications , Humans , Hypersensitivity/complications , Logistic Models , Male , Masticatory Muscles/physiopathology , Neck Muscles/physiopathology , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Stress, Physiological/complications , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/classification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...