ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) requires pressure titration usually performed during attended in-hospital polysomnography. This manual titration procedure is not well standardized. The aim of the study was to ascertain whether a new automatic titration device is as effective as standard manual titration in determining constant CPAP pressure. METHODS: We included 38 patients with a newly diagnosed OSAS. Participants were randomly assigned to attended in-laboratory manual titration and automatic titration in two consecutive nights. Fixed CPAP pressure was set at the optimal pressure determined during the second night. The follow-up period was 6 weeks. Main outcomes were apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). RESULTS: AHI (manual: baseline 40.5+/-21.5/h vs. treatment 6.4+/-3.3/h (p<0.001); automatic: 53.3+/-28.1/h vs. 7.8+/-3.3/h (p<0.001)) and ESS (manual: 11.3+/-4.7 vs. 8.8+/-5.1 (ns); automatic: 11.5+/-5.6 vs. 7.0+/-3.8 (p<0.05)) showed a similar improvement in both groups. Pressure recommendation by the device and the technician, although not statistically different (8.7+/-2.9 vs. 9.0+/-3.3 mbar), corresponded only in 50% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Automatic titration effectively predicts constant CPAP pressure for long-term treatment when performed during an attended polysomnography. Careful evaluation of raw data and polysomnography recording is mandatory before choosing a fixed CPAP pressure after automatic titration.
Subject(s)
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/methods , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/standards , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Adult , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/instrumentation , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polysomnography , Pressure , Reference Standards , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The coexistence of obstructive (OSAS) and central sleep apnoea (CSA) and Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) is common in patients with and without underlying heart diseases. CPAP has been shown to improve CSA/CSR by about 50%, but recent data suggest maximal suppression of CSA is important in improving clinical outcomes in heart failure patients. Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) effectively suppresses CSA/CSR in heart failure, but only few trials have considered patients with coexisting OSAS and CSA/CSR. METHODS: Prospective, observational pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of a new ASV device, the BiPAP AutoSV, in 10 male consecutive patients with coexisting OSAS and CSA/CSR with and without heart failure over eight weeks. Six had stable heart failure. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The total AHI improved from 48.9+/-20.6/h to 8.7+/-7.4, the obstructive AHI from 15.8+/-16.2/h to 2.6+/-2.5/h and the central AHI from 33.1+/-10.8/h to 6.1+/-5.9/h (all p<0.01). Furthermore, there was a significant improvement in sleep profile and respiratory related arousals. The six patients with cardiovascular disease, including three with congestive heart failure, showed similar improvements in all parameters. CONCLUSIONS: BiPAP AutoSV was effective in reducing all types of respiratory disturbances in coexisting OSAS and CSA/CSR with and without heart failure. Further studies comparing the long-term clinical efficacy of this device against CPAP are warranted.
