Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 42(7): 1305-1312, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33926901

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The high diagnostic value of DWI for cholesteatoma diagnostics is undisputed. This study compares the diagnostic value of readout-segmented echo-planar DWI and single-shot TSE DWI for cholesteatoma diagnostics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with newly suspected cholesteatoma were examined with a dedicated protocol, including readout-segmented echo-planar DWI and single-shot TSE DWI at 1.5T. Acquisition parameters of both diffusion-weighted sequences were as follows: b=1000 s/mm,2 axial and coronal section orientations, and section thickness of 3 mm. Image quality was evaluated by 2 readers on a 5-point Likert scale with respect to lesion conspicuity, the presence of susceptibility artifacts mimicking cholesteatomas, and overall subjective image quality. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using histology results as the gold standard. RESULTS: Twenty-five cases of histologically confirmed cholesteatomas were included in the study group. Lesion conspicuity was higher and fewer artifacts were found when using TSE DWI (both P < .001). The overall subjective image quality, however, was better with readout-segmented DWI. For TSE DWI, the sensitivity for readers 1 and 2 was 92% (95% CI, 74%-99%) and 88% (95% CI, 69%-97%), respectively, while the specificity for both readers was 80% (95% CI, 28%-99%). For readout-segmented DWI, the sensitivity for readers 1 and 2 was 76% (95% CI, 55%-91%) and 68% (95% CI, 46%-85%), while the specificity for both readers was 60% (95% CI, 15%-95%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of TSE DWI is advisable for cholesteatoma diagnostics and preferable over readout-segmented DWI.


Subject(s)
Cholesteatoma , Echo-Planar Imaging , Artifacts , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Image Enhancement
2.
Clin Radiol ; 72(10): 900.e1-900.e8, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28687167

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate an abbreviated, contrast-agent free diffusion-weighted (DW) breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol that provides a single image for the radiologist to read in order to non-invasively examine Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 lesions detected using breast cancer screening X-ray mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective evaluation within a institutional review board-approved, prospective study included 115 women (mean 57 years, range 50-69 years) with BI-RADS 4 findings on X-ray mammography and indication for biopsy over a period of 15 months. Full diagnostic breast MRI (FDP) was performed prior to biopsy (1.5 T). Maximum intensity breast diffusion (MIBD) images were generated from DW images (b = 1,500 mm/s2, 3 mm section thickness) of the breast. MIBD and T2-weighted (T2W) images were read by two radiologists and compared to the diagnostic accuracy of an expert reading of the FDP with histopathology as the reference standard. The acquisition time of MIBD and T2W MRI was about 7 minutes. RESULTS: MIBD MRI provided a diagnostic accuracy of 87.93% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80.58-93.24%) for R1 and 89.66% (95% CI: 82.63-94.54%) for R2. Expert reading of the FDP revealed a similar accuracy of 86.2% (95% CI: 78.67-91.43%). The positive predictive value (PPV) could be increased from 36.2% (95% CI: 28.02-45.28; X-ray mammography alone) to a mean PPV of 80.89% (R1 79.17%, R2 82.16%) using MIBD MRI. Mean reading time was 30 seconds (25%/75 percentile 24.5-41.25). CONCLUSIONS: MIBD MRI might be of supplemental value if added to the work-up of BI-RADS 4 X-ray mammography screening findings. MIBD MRI might help reduce the false-positive rate prior to biopsy for reference lesions at only limited expense of measurement and reading time.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Mammography/methods , Aged , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Radiologe ; 56(2): 137-47, 2016 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26801187

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique that was established in the clinical routine primarily for the detection of brain ischemia. In the past 15 years its clinical use has been extended to oncological radiology, as tumor and metastases can be depicted in DWI due to their hypercellular nature. PRINCIPLES: The basis of DWI is the Stejskal-Tanner experiment. The diffusion properties of tissue can be visualized after acquisition of at least two diffusion-weighted series using echo planar imaging and a specific sequence of gradient pulses. CLINICAL APPLICATIONS: The use of DWI in prostate MRI was reported to be one of the first established applications that found its way into internationally recognized clinical guidelines of the European Society of Urological Radiology (ESUR) and the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) scale. Due to recently reported high specificity and negative predictive values of 94% and 92%, respectively, its regular use for breast MRI is expected in the near future. Furthermore, DWI can also reliably be used for whole-body imaging in patients with multiple myeloma or for measuring the extent of bone metastases. OUTLOOK: New techniques in DWI, such as intravoxel incoherent motion imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging and histogram-based analyses represent promising approaches to achieve a more quantitative evaluation for tumor detection and therapy response.


Subject(s)
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Whole Body Imaging/methods , Humans
4.
Magn Reson Med ; 69(1): 188-99, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22383403

ABSTRACT

Tissue microcirculation can be quantified by a deconvolution analysis of concentration-time curves measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. However, deconvolution is an ill-posed problem, which requires regularization of the solutions. In this work, four algebraic deconvolution/regularization methods were evaluated: truncated singular value decomposition and generalized Tikhonov regularization (GTR) in combination with the L-curve criterion, a modified LCC (GTR-MLCC), and a response function model that takes a-priori knowledge into account. To this end, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data sets were simulated by an established physiologically reference model for different signal-to-noise ratios and measured on a 1.5-T system in the lung of 10 healthy volunteers and 20 patients. Analysis of both the simulated and measured dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging datasets revealed that GTR in combination with the L-curve criterion does not yield reliable and clinically useful results. The three other deconvolution/regularization algorithms resulted in almost identical microcirculatory parameter estimates for signal-to-noise ratios > 10. At low signal-to-noise ratios levels (<10) typically occurring in pathological lung regions, GTR in combination with a modified L-curve criterion approximates the true response function much more accurately than truncated singular value decomposition and GTR in combination with response function model with a difference in accuracy of up to 76%. In conclusion, GTR in combination with a modified L-curve criterion is recommended for the deconvolution of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging curves measured in the lung parenchyma of patients with highly heterogeneous signal-to-noise ratios.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Lung/blood supply , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Microcirculation/physiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
5.
Radiologe ; 51(3): 170-9, 2011 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21424762

ABSTRACT

This article gives an overview of the many different technical aspects of diffusion-weighted imaging and a review of the physical and mathematical background. Specific terms, such as free and restricted diffusion are introduced and elucidated. The measurement of diffusion by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and which phenomena can occur are described. Finally, an overview of current developments in diffusion imaging and its application in research is presented.


Subject(s)
Brain/pathology , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Neural Pathways/pathology , Algorithms , Brain/physiopathology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Mathematics , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Phantoms, Imaging , Physical Phenomena
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...