ABSTRACT
BackgroundIn the United States, oral nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) is authorized for use among patients aged [≥]12 years with mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection who are at risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization. However, effectiveness under real-world conditions has not been well established. MethodsWe undertook a matched, observational cohort study of non-hospitalized individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection to compare outcomes between those who received or did not receive nirmatrelvir-ritonavir within the Kaiser Permanente Southern California healthcare system. Individuals were matched on testing date, age, sex, treatment/care setting, symptoms status (including presence or absence of acute COVID-19 symptoms at testing, and time from symptom onset to testing), history of vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection, Charlson comorbidity index, and prior-year healthcare utilization. Time to hospital admission was compared between matched COVID-19 cases who received or did not receive nirmatrelvir-ritonavir. Primary analyses evaluated treatment effectiveness against any hospital admission and acute respiratory infection (ARI)-associated hospital admission, with dispense occurring 0-5 days symptom onset. Secondary analyses evaluated effectiveness against the same endpoints for all treatment dispenses. We measured treatment effectiveness as (1-adjusted hazards ratio [aHR])x100%, estimating the aHR via Cox proportional hazards models accounting for match strata and additional patient characteristics. ResultsAnalyses included 4,329 nirmatrelvir-ritonavir recipients and 20,980 matched non-recipients who were followed [≥]30 days after a positive SARS-CoV-2 outpatient test. Overall, 23,603 (93.3%) and 19,564 (78.1%) of 25,039 participants had received [≥]2 and [≥]3 COVID-19 vaccine doses, respectively. A total of 23,858 (94.2% of 25,039) patients were symptomatic at the point of testing, with a 2.1 day mean time from symptom onset to testing. For patients dispensed nirmatrelvir-ritonavir 0-5 days after symptom onset, effectiveness in preventing all hospital admissions was 88.1% (95% confidence interval: 49.0-97.5%) over 15 days and 71.9% (25.3-90.0%) over 30 days, respectively. Effectiveness in preventing ARI-associated hospital admissions was 88.3% (12.9-98.8%) and 87.3% (18.3-98.5%) over 15 and 30 days, respectively. In expanded analyses that included patients receiving treatment at any point during their clinical course, effectiveness was 86.6% (54.9-96.3%) and 78.0% (46.2-91.4%) in preventing all hospital admissions over 15 and 30 days, respectively, and 93.7% (52.5-99.4%) and 92.8% (53.9-99.1%) in preventing ARI-associated hospital admissions over 15 and 30 days. Subgroup analyses identified similar effectiveness estimates among patients who had received [≥]2 COVID-19 vaccine doses. ImplicationsIn a real-world setting with high levels of COVID-19 vaccine and booster uptake, receipt of nirmatrelvirritonavir 0-5 days after symptom onset was associated substantial reductions in risk of hospital admission among individuals testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection in outpatient settings. FundingUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US National Institutes of Health
ABSTRACT
BackgroundAlthough there is extensive literature on the clinical benefits of COVID-19 vaccination, data on humanistic effects are limited. This study evaluated the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on symptoms, Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Work Productivity and Impairment (WPAI) prior to and one month following infection, and compared results between individuals vaccinated with BNT162b2 and those unvaccinated. MethodsSubjects with [≥]1 self-reported symptom and positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 at CVS Health US test sites were recruited between 01/31/2022-04/30/2022. Socio-demographics, clinical characteristics and vaccination status were evaluated. Self-reported symptoms, HRQoL, and WPAI outcomes were assessed using questionnaires and validated instruments (EQ-5D-5L, WPAI-GH) across acute COVID time points from pre-COVID to Week 4, and between vaccination groups. Mixed models for repeated measures were conducted for multivariable analyses, adjusting for several covariates. Effect size (ES) of Cohens d was calculated to quantify the magnitude of outcome changes within and between vaccination groups. ResultsThe study population included 430 subjects: 197 unvaccinated and 233 vaccinated with BNT162b2. Mean (SD) age was 42.4 years (14.3), 76.0% were female, 38.8% reported prior infection and 24.2% at least one comorbidity. Statistically significant differences in outcomes were observed compared with baseline and between groups. The EQ-Visual analogue scale scores and Utility Index dropped in both cohorts at Day 3 and increased by Week 4, but did not return to pre-COVID levels. The mean changes were statistically lower in the BNT162b2 cohort at Day 3 and Week 4. The BNT162b2 cohort reported lower prevalence and fewer symptoms at index date and Week 4. At Week 1, COVID-19 had a large impact on all WPAI-GH domains: the work productivity time loss among unvaccinated and vaccinated was 65.0% and 53.8%, and the mean activity impairment was 50.2% and 43.9%, respectively. With the exception of absenteeism at Week 4, the BNT162b2 cohort was associated with statistically significant less worsening in all WPAI-GH scores at both Week 1 and 4. ConclusionsCOVID-19 negatively impacted HRQoL and work productivity among mildly symptomatic outpatients. Compared with unvaccinated, those vaccinated with BNT162b2 were less impacted by COVID-19 infection and recovered faster.
