ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) is a rare autoimmune disorder combining autoantibodies and specific clinical manifestations. One of the particularities of ASS is the pleiomorphic radiological presentation seen at the initial work-up. Evaluating treatment response can also be challenging and requires specific clinical, functional, biological and radiological monitoring. For these reasons, it is fundamental to identify specific radiological and clinical features of ASS for improved diagnosis and therapeutic approaches.METHODS: We retrospectively studied all patients suffering from ASS in the CHU of Liège from 2008 to 2019. We analysed the clinical features, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), computed tomography (CT), and longitudinal evolution with regard to patient treatment.RESULTS: In the whole cohort of 30 patients, we identified 19 with anti-JO1 antibodies, 5 with anti-PL12 antibodies and 6 with anti-PL7 antibodies. The sex ratio was slightly in favour of males. Interestingly, PL-12 syndrome was more likely to be present in younger patients than those associated with other antibodies. Overall, 77% of the overall cohort exhibited specific pulmonary involvement without any significant difference with regard to the severity assessed by PFT at diagnosis. In contrast, the radiological presentation was pleomorphic for anti-JO1 syndrome, and anti-PL12 syndrome exhibited mainly ground-glass opacities (GGOs) and reticular abnormalities, while those with anti-PL7 antibodies showed reticulations and bronchiectasis. Longitudinal CT analysis mainly showed a reduction in consolidations and GGOs with specific therapies.CONCLUSION: In our single-centre retrospective study, we found different profiles for different autoantibodies according to age and radiological appearance.
Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , Autoantibodies , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Ligases , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Objective@#To compare computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) customized nitinol retainers with standard stainlesssteel fixed retainers over a 12-month study period. @*Methods@#This randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted on 62 patients randomly allocated to a control group that received stainless-steel retainers or a test group that received customized CAD/CAM nickel-titanium retainers. Four time points were defined:retainer placement (T0) and 1-month (T1), 6-month (T2), and 12-month (T3) follow-up appointments. At each time point, Little’s irregularity index (LII) (primary endpoint) and dental stability measurements such as intercanine width were recorded in addition to assessment of periodontal parameters. Radiological measurements such as the incisor mandibular plane angle (IMPA) were recorded at T0 and T3. Failure events (wire integrity or debonding) were assessed at each time point. @*Results@#From T0 to T3, LII and other dental measurements showed no significant differences between the two groups. The data for periodontal parameters remained stable over the study period, except for the gingival index, which was slightly, but significantly, higher in the test group at T3 (p = 0.039).The IMPA angle showed no intergroup difference. The two groups showed no significant difference in debonding events. @*Conclusions@#This RCT conducted over a 12-month period demonstrated no significant difference between customized CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainers and standard stainlesssteel lingual retainers in terms of dental anterior stability and retainer survival.Both retainers eventually appeared to be equally effective in maintaining periodontal health.
