A Scoping Review of Trauma-Informed Curricula for Primary Care Providers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traumatic experiences such as abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction have a lifetime prevalence of 62%-75% and can negatively impact health outcomes. However, many primary care providers (PCPs) are inadequately prepared to treat patients with trauma due to a lack of training. Our objective was to identify trauma-informed approach curricula for PCPs, review their effectiveness, and identify gaps. METHODS: We systematically identified articles from Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier, Cochrane, PsycINFO, MedEd Portal, and the STFM Resource Library. Search term headings "trauma-informed care (TIC)," "resilience," "patient-centered care," "primary care," and "education." Inclusion criteria were PCP, pediatric and adult patients, and training evaluation. Exclusion criteria were outside the United States, non-English articles, non-PCPs, and inpatient settings. We used the TIC pyramid to extract topics. We analyzed evaluation methods using the Kirkpatrick Model. RESULTS: Researchers reviewed 6,825 articles and identified 17 different curricula. Understanding health effects of trauma was the most common topic (94%). Evaluation data revealed overall positive reactions and improved knowledge, attitudes, and confidence. Half (53%) reported Kirkpatrick level 3 behavior change evaluation outcomes with increased trauma screening and communication, but no change in referrals. Only 12% (2/17) evaluated Kirkpatrick level 4 patient satisfaction (significant results) and health outcomes (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Pilot findings from studies in our review show trauma-informed curricula for PCPs reveal positive reactions, an increase in knowledge, screening, communication, and patient satisfaction, but no change in referrals or health outcomes. Further research is needed to examine the impact of trainings on quality of care and health outcomes.

Characterization and Management of Inflammatory Eye Disease in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Purpose: To assess the spectrum and treatment outcomes of inflammatory eye disease (IED) in subjects with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).Methods: We conducted a single center retrospective chart review of 236 patients with HS seen for ophthalmic examination between 2013 and 2018.Results: Of 236 subjects with HS, 22 subjects (9.3%) were found to have IED. Seven of 22 subjects had more than one IED diagnosis. Anterior uveitis was the most common type of IED (40.9% of subjects with IED). Episcleritis, optic neuritis, keratitis, scleritis, intermediate and posterior uveitis, trochleitis, and dacryoadenitis were also observed. Of subjects with HS and IED, 59.1% did not have any other inflammatory or autoimmune disease that could explain the etiology of their IED. Eleven patients with IED were treated with systemic immunosuppression, with IED as the principal factor directing treatment in three patients.Conclusions: IED may be independently associated with HS and may benefit from systemic immunosuppression.

Modified V-Y Turndown Flap Augmentation for Quadriceps Tendon Rupture Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Quadriceps tendon rupture following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an infrequent but potentially devastating adverse event. Although uncommon, the long-term sequelae of this injury can result in permanent inability to walk. Despite the severity of this injury, there is no single accepted treatment, with various surgical methods producing mixed results. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a modified V-Y turndown flap as a viable alternative method of treatment for this injury. METHODS: Twenty-four quadriceps tendon ruptures in 23 patients (10 men and 13 women) who underwent TKA (8 primary and 15 revision), including 1 tendon rerupture, were treated with use of a modified V-Y turndown. The average patient age at the time of the V-Y flap repair was 61 years (range, 41 to 86 years). Knee Society scores, range of motion, strength, medical comorbidities, nature of the procedure (i.e., primary versus revision), and the ability to walk were all recorded before and after the quadriceps reconstruction, along with general satisfaction and adverse events following the procedure. RESULTS: Twelve patients (52%) had predisposing comorbidities, including obesity, diabetes, chronic dialysis, and steroid dependence. Prior to repair with the V-Y flap, none of the patients were able to walk independently, requiring either a wheelchair or walker. No patient had quadriceps strength greater than 3 (of 5), although all had full passive extension. Following the repair procedure, patients had significant (p < 0.0001) improvements in mean Knee Society knee score (88.7; range, 45 to 95) and mean strength (4.8; range, 3 to 5), and all were able to walk without assistive devices. Twenty knees exhibited active range of motion of 0° to 120°, whereas 4 had residual extensor lag of ≥5° (range, 5° to 35°). Major adverse events were limited to a single hematoma and an unacceptable extensor lag (35°) after repair. CONCLUSIONS: The modified V-Y quadriceps tendon turndown flap was a reliable alternative treatment for achieving restoration of the extensor mechanism after complete quadriceps tendon rupture following TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Nutrition Environment Food Pantry Assessment Tool (NEFPAT): Development and Evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a nutrition environment assessment tool to assess the consumer nutrition environment and use of recommended practices in food pantries. METHODS: The Nutrition Environment Food Pantry Assessment Tool (NEFPAT) was developed based on a literature review and guidance from professionals working with food pantries. The tool was pilot-tested at 9 food pantries, an expert panel assessed content validity, and interrater reliability was evaluated by pairs in 3 pantries. After revisions, the NEFPAT was used in 27 pantries. RESULTS: Pilot tests indicated positive appraisal for the NEFPAT and recommendations were addressed. The NEFPAT's 6 objectives and the overall tool were rated as content valid by experts, with an average section rating of 3.85 ± 0.10. Intraclass correlation coefficients for interrater reliability were >0.90. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The NEFPAT is content valid with high interrater reliability. It provides baseline data that could be valuable for interventions within the nutrition environment of food pantries.