A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of rifaximin for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and tolerability between different regimens of rifaximin vaginal tablets and a placebo for treatment of bacterial vaginosis. METHODS: In a prospective study carried out at 13 sites in 3 European countries between August 2009 and October 2010, White, non-pregnant, premenopausal women with bacterial vaginosis were randomly assigned to receive rifaximin at 100mg for 5 days (100mg/5 days), 25mg/5 days, or 100mg/2 days, or placebo. Women were assessed at 7-10 and 28-35 days. Diagnosis and cure were based on Amsel criteria and Nugent score. Fisher exact test was used to compare cure rates. RESULTS: Among 114 women recruited, 103 were evaluable for drug efficacy. Therapeutic cure rate at first follow-up was higher in the rifaximin 25mg/5 days (48%, P=0.04), 100mg/2 days (36.0%), and 100mg/5 days (25.9%) groups than in the placebo group (19.0%). At second follow-up, therapeutic cure rate was 28.0%, 14.8%, and 4.0% in the respective groups versus 7.7% in the placebo group. No difference in adverse events was observed. CONCLUSION: Rifaximin at 25mg/5 days showed better therapeutic cure rates and maintenance of therapeutic cure after 1 month versus placebo. All treatment regimens were well tolerated. EudraCT number: 2009-011826-32.

Efficacy of rifaximin vaginal tablets in treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a molecular characterization of the vaginal microbiota.

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common vaginal disorder characterized by an alteration of the vaginal bacterial morphotypes, associated with sexually transmitted infections and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the impact of different doses of rifaximin vaginal tablets (100 mg/day for 5 days, 25 mg/day for 5 days, and 100 mg/day for 2 days) on the vaginal microbiota of 102 European patients with BV enrolled in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. An integrated molecular approach based on quantitative PCR (qPCR) and PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) was used to investigate the effects of vaginal tablets containing the antibiotic. An increase in members of the genus Lactobacillus and a decrease in the BV-related bacterial groups after the antibiotic treatment were demonstrated by qPCR. PCR-DGGE profiles confirmed the capability of rifaximin to modulate the composition of the vaginal microbial communities and to reduce their complexity. This molecular analysis supported the clinical observation that rifaximin at 25 mg/day for 5 days represents an effective treatment to be used in future pivotal studies for the treatment of BV.

A randomised, two-period, cross-over, open-label study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of single doses of two different flurbiprofen 8.75-mg lozenges in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: To compare the bioavailability of a new oromucosal formulation of flurbiprofen 8.75-mg lozenges, developed by Alfa Wassermann S.p.A. (test drug) to that of marketed flurbiprofen 8.75-mg lozenges (Benactiv Gola®, reference drug). METHODS: This was an open, randomised, two-period, crossover, pharmacokinetic (PK) study in which flurbiprofen plasma levels were compared in 12 healthy volunteers after the administration of single doses (8.75 mg × 2) of two different oromucosal lozenges to be sucked and slowly dissolved in the mouth. A wash-out period of at least 7 days separated the two study periods. Blood samples were collected prior to dosing and at predefined intervals for 24 h after dose. Flurbiprofen plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to maximum plasma concentration (T(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours (AUC(0-t)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-)∞) and half-life were calculated and compared by analysis of variance using treatment, period and sequence as sources of variation. Bioequivalence between the two formulations was based on 90% confidence intervals of the ratio of the geometric means of C(max) and AUC falling within the 0.80-1.25 range as defined in bioequivalence guidelines by regulators. Tolerability of the two formulations was assessed by adverse event monitoring, routine laboratory tests, physical examination, electrocardiographic tracing and vital sign measurements. RESULTS: All enrolled subjects completed the study. Bioequivalence without significant treatment effect was demonstrated between the test drug/reference drug ratios of mean C(max) and AUCs. Moreover, mean T(max) was superimposable. No safety parameter presented a clinically relevant variation after administration of either formulation that were therefore well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The new formulation of flurbiprofen 8.75-mg compressed lozenges developed by Alfa Wassermann S.p.A. is bioequivalent to the reference product flurbiprofen 8.75-mg lozenges (Benactiv Gola) in healthy volunteers.