[Locally advanced rectal cancer management: which role for the pathologist in 2011?]. / Prise en charge des cancers du rectum localement avancés : quel rôle pour le pathologiste en 2011 ?

Locally advanced rectal cancers mainly correspond to lieberkünhien adenocarcinomas and are defined by T3-T4 lesions with or without regional metastatic lymph nodes. Such tumors benefit from neoadjuvant treatment combining chemotherapy and radiotherapy, followed by surgery with total mesorectum excision. Such a strategy can decrease the rate of local relapse and lead to an easier complementary surgery. The pathologist plays an important role in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer. Indeed, he is involved in the gross examination of the mesorectum excision quality and in the exhaustive sampling of the most informative areas. He also has to perform a precise histopathological analysis, including the determination of the circumferential margin or clearance and the evaluation of tumor regression. All these parameters are major prognostic factors which have to be clearly included in the pathology report. Moreover, the next challenge for the pathologist will be to determine and validate new prognostic and predictive markers, notably by using pre-therapeutic biopsies. The goal of this mini-review is to emphasize the pathologist's role in the different steps of the management of locally advanced rectal cancers and to underline its implication in the determination of potential biomarkers of aggressiveness and response.

Increased expression of fatty acid synthase and progesterone receptor in early steps of human mammary carcinogenesis.

Progestins increase the risk of breast cancer in the hormone therapy of menopause, and progesterone receptor-induced fatty acid synthase (FAS) is a potential therapeutical target of breast cancer. In a first attempt to specify in which lesions at risk of breast cancer progestins might be acting, we have compared the progesterone receptor (PR) and FAS expression in preinvasive breast lesions and in adjacent "normal" mammary glands. We used archive paraffin-embedded tissues from 116 patients, with 164 lesions of increasing histological risk from nonproliferative "benign" breast disease (BBD) to in situ breast carcinomas. Immunostaining using our FAS antibody and a PR antibody from Dako was quantified as continuous variables by computer-assisted image analysis. FAS level increased (p < 10(-3) by the Kruskall-Wallis test) in all lesions, starting from nonproliferative BBD, and was maximal in in situ carcinoma. The % of PR-positive cells increased from nonproliferative BBD and was higher in proliferative atypia (p < 10(-3)). It was very low in high-grade DCIS corresponding to a likely different carcinogenesis pathway. There was a trend for a positive correlation between FAS and PR in normal glands. However, the 2 markers increased independently in BBD and were negatively correlated in in situ carcinomas. FAS and PR were positively correlated with Ki67 in BBD. The increased PR level in premalignant steps of mammary carcinogenesis suggests an early increased responsiveness to progestins. The increased FAS expression, in lesions parallel to their increased breast cancer risk, suggests further studies to develop new markers of high-risk lesions and to prevent breast cancer.

Estrogen receptor beta (ER beta) level but not its ER beta cx variant helps to predict tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer.

The antiestrogen tamoxifen, a major endocrine therapy of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, is nevertheless inefficient in 30 to 40% of cases for unknown reasons. We retrospectively studied 50 ER-positive primary breast carcinomas. All of the patients had received tamoxifen as the only adjuvant therapy. They were divided into two groups depending on whether they relapsed within 5 years (16 tamoxifen-resistant cases) or did not relapse within 5 years (34 tamoxifen-sensitive cases). The expression of total ER beta protein, and of ER beta cx protein, was estimated anonymously in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor sections, by using specific antibodies and quantifiying nuclear immunostaining with a computer image analyzer. All of the tumors were found to be HER-2/neu-negative by immunohistochemistry. Univariate analysis showed that Scarff-Bloom-Richardsson grade modified by Elston (SBR grade; P < 0.001), tumor size (P = 0.042), and MIB-1 proliferation index (P = 0.02) were significantly higher in tamoxifen-resistant tumors. A low level of total ER beta, whether in percentage of positive cells or in quantitative immunocytochemical (QIC) score, was also associated with tamoxifen resistance (P = 0.004). ER beta cx expression and lymph node status were similar between the two groups. The expression of ER beta in the total population was positively correlated with ER beta cx (r = 0.63, P < 0.001), and was independent of the other parameters. In a multivariate analysis, ER beta expression was the most important variable (P = 0.001), followed by SBR grade (I+II versus III; P = 0.008), and MIB-1 (P = 0.016). To conclude, tamoxifen resistance is associated with classical variables of aggressive tumors (high SBR grade, proliferation index, and tumor size) but not with node invasiveness. Low ER beta level is an additional independent marker, better than ER alpha level, to predict tamoxifen resistance.