Influence of the preoperative L5S1 disc state on lateral L2 to L5 fusion's outcomes at an average follow-up of 3,5 years (minimum 2 years).

INTRODUCTION: The impact of pre-existing degeneration of a disc underlying a lumbar arthrodesis via lateral approach on long-term clinical outcome has, to our knowledge, not been studied. When performing arthrodesis between L2 and L5, its extension to L5S1 is challenging because it imposes a different surgical approach. Therefore, surgeon's temptation is to not include L5S1 in the fusion even in case of discopathy. Our objective was to study the influence of the preoperative L5S1 status on the clinical outcome of lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) using a pre-psoatic approach between L2 and L5 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent LLIF from L2 to L5 between 2015 and 2020 were included in our study. We studied VAS, ODI, and global clinical outcome before surgery and at last follow-up. The L5-S1 disc was radiologically studied in preoperative imaging. Patients were included in two groups (A "with" and B :without" L5-S1 disc degeneration) to compare the clinical outcomes at last follow-up. Our primary objective was to evaluate the rate of L5-S1 disc revision surgery at last follow-up. RESULTS: 102 patients were included. 2 required L5-S1 disc surgery following overlying arthrodesis. Our results showed a significant improvement in the patients' clinical outcomes at the last follow-up (p < 0.0001). We did not find any significant difference on clinical criteria between groups A & B. CONCLUSION: A preop L5S1 disc degeneration does not seem to impact the final clinical outcomes after lumbar lateral interbody fusion at a minimal two years F.U. It should not be systematically involved in an overlying fusion.

Flexor tendon rupture after volar plating of distal radius fracture: A systematic review of the literature.

Flexor tendon rupture after volar plate fixation of distal radius fracture (DRF) is rare. There is no consensus as to how to prevent them. The aim of our study was to identify the pathological mechanisms, and to establish the clinical and epidemiological profile of patients suffering from this complication. We carried out a systematic review using the PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Studies were included if they described complete or partial flexor tendon rupture following volar plate fixation of DRF. Forty-six 46 were included, for a total of 145 patients were reported: 138 from the literature, and 7 from our personal experience. Etiology was usually mechanical, by impingement with either the plate or protruding screws. Plate impingement was due to positioning beyond the watershed line, consolidation with posterior tilt, plate thickness, or low palmar cortical angle. Mean patient age was 62.4 years (range, 23-89 years). Median postoperative interval was 8 months (range, 3-120 months). Flexor pollicis longus was the most frequently injured tendon. The plate should be positioned proximally to the watershed line if possible, to ensure good initial reduction. Hardware should be removed 4 months after surgery if the plate is causing impingement according to the Soong criteria or if signs of tenosynovitis appear.