Epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control after adolescent spinal fusion procedures which violated the epidural space.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of epidural analgesia in scoliosis patients with an opened (violated) spinal canal. BACKGROUND: Postoperative continuous epidural analgesia using local anesthetics and/or opioids has been described with good success after posterior scoliosis correction. One of the concerns with the use of epidural catheters for pain control is the reliability and distribution of analgesic medication when the epidural space is violated intraoperatively by Smith-Petersen osteotomies or placement of multiple sublaminar wires. METHODS: The medical records of 55 patients who underwent pediatric deformity surgery for scoliosis at a single university center over 1-year period (January 2007 to January 2008) were reviewed. Patient demographic, surgical, and postoperative data were collected. A chi test was used to make comparisons on the basis of categorical data, whereas analysis of variance tests were used to make comparisons on the basis of means. Statistical significance was defined as a probability value of <0.5. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were managed with epidural analgesia, whereas 26 patients were managed with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA). Seven of the 29 patients with epidural analgesia had a violation of their epidural space during their surgery, which did not alter the efficacy of their postoperative analgesia with an epidural. Epidural analgesia provided a lower mean pain score (P=0.022) over the first 24 hours and fewer pain scores over 4 (P=0.050) during that same time period than IV PCA for all patients as well as those with a violated spinal canal. There was no statistical difference in the rates of pruritus, nausea, ileus, constipation, urinary retention, change in neurologic examination, or rate of infection between the patients with a violated spinal canal and those with an intact spinal canal. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients managed with an epidural had significantly lower pain scores than those managed with IV PCA despite violation of the epidural space.

Interventional techniques for back pain.

Most Americans will be afflicted by some form of spine-related pain in their lifetime. In older patients, the most frequent source of back pain is lumbar spinal stenosis or vertebral compression fracture. Although most back pain is self-limited, some patients will require interventional techniques. This article reviews minimally invasive techniques for treating back pain, lumbosacral radicular pain, lumbar spinal stenosis, and compression fractures.

Myofascial trigger points.

Painful conditions of the musculoskeletal system, including myofascial pain syndrome, constitute some of the most important chronic problems encountered in a clinical practice. A myofascial trigger point is a hyperirritable spot, usually within a taut band of skeletal muscle, which is painful on compression and can give rise to characteristic referred pain, motor dysfunction, and autonomic phenomena. Trigger points may be relieved through noninvasive measures, such as spray and stretch, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, physical therapy, and massage. Invasive treatments for myofascial trigger points include injections with local anesthetics, corticosteroids, or botulism toxin or dry needling. The etiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of myofascial trigger points are addressed in this article.

Intra-articular injections.

Intra-articular injections are one method that physicians may use to treat joint pain. This method offers direct access to the source of pain for the troubled patient. Substances ranging from steroids to hyaluronic acid have been injected successfully into the various joints of the body in an attempt to provide relief for chronic joint pain. Anesthesiologists and orthopedic surgeons have begun to use intra-articular injections of local anesthetics for postoperative analgesia. The history, agents, and methods of intra-articular injections are reviewed.

Invasive and minimally invasive surgical techniques for back pain conditions.

This article summarizes current issues related to invasive and minimally invasive surgical techniques for back pain conditions. It describes pain generators and explains theories about how discs fail. The article discusses techniques for treating painful sciatica, painful motion segments, and spinal stenosis. Problems related to current imaging are also presented. The article concludes with a discussion about physical therapy.

Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

Vertebral compression fractures occur more frequently than hip and ankle fractures combined. These fragility fractures frequently result in both acute and chronic pain, but more importantly are a source of increased morbidity and possibly mortality. Percutaneous veretebral augmentation offers a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. The history, technique, and results of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are reviewed. Both methods allow for the introduction of bone cement into the fracture site with clinical results indicating substantial pain relief in approximately 90% of patients.

Myofascial trigger points.

Painful conditions of the musculoskeletal system, including myofascial pain syndrome, constitute some of the most important chronic problems encountered in a clinical practice. A myofascial trigger points is a hyperirritable spot, usually within a taut band of skeletal muscle, which is painful on compression and can give rise to characteristic referred pain, motor dysfunction, and autonomic phenomena. Trigger points may be relieved through noninvasive measures, such as spray and stretch, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, physical therapy, and massage. Invasive treatments for myofascial trigger points include injections with local anesthetics, corticosteroids, or botulism toxin or dry needling. The etiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of myofascial trigger points are addressed in this article.

Intra-articular injections.

Intra-articular injections are one method that physicians may use to treat joint pain. This method offers direct access to the source of pain for the troubled patient. Substances ranging from steroids to hyaluronic acid have been injected successfully into the various joints of the body in an attempt to provide relief for chronic joint pain. Anesthesiologists and orthopedic surgeons have begun to use intra-articular injections of local anesthetics for postoperative analgesia. This history, agents, and methods of intra-articular injections are reviewed.

Invasive and minimally invasive surgical techniques for back pain conditions.

Back pain is a ubiquitous problem for developed countries. It is a source of disability for society and is a financial drain through lost wages and productivity. The treatment of spine-related pain has changed over the years: minimally invasive approaches are now favored. Despite this trend, surgeons still rely on decompressions of compressed neurological structures and the fusion of painful motion segments. The history of treatments of spine-related pain as well as modern and minimally invasive techniques are reviewed.

Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

Vertebral compression fractures occur more frequently than hip and ankle fractures combined. These fragility fractures frequently result in both acute and chronic pain, but more importantly are a source of increased morbidity and possibly mortality. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation offers a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. The history, technique, and results of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are reviewed. Both methods allow for the introduction of bone cement into the fracture site with clinical results indicating substantial pain relief in approximately 90% of patients.