Tea tree oil (5%) body wash versus standard care (Johnson's Baby Softwash) to prevent colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the daily use of 5% tea tree oil (TTO) body wash (Novabac 5% Skin Wash) compared with standard care [Johnson's Baby Softwash (JBS)] had a lower incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization. PATIENTS: The study setting was two intensive care units (ICUs; mixed medical, surgical and trauma) in Northern Ireland between October 2007 and July 2009. The study population comprised 391 patients who were randomized to JBS or TTO body wash. METHODS: This was a Phase 2/3, prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN65190967. The primary outcome was new MRSA colonization during ICU stay. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of MRSA bacteraemia and maximum increase in sequential organ failure assessment score. RESULTS: A total of 445 patients were randomized to the study. After randomization, 54 patients were withdrawn; 30 because of a positive MRSA screen at study entry, 11 due to lack of consent, 11 were inappropriately randomized and 2 had adverse reactions. Thirty-nine (10%) patients developed new MRSA colonization (JBS n = 22, 11.2%; TTO body wash n = 17, 8.7%). The difference in percentage colonized (2.5%, 95% CI - 8.95 to 3.94; P = 0.50) was not significant. The mean maximum increase in sequential organ failure assessment score was not significant (JBS 1.44, SD 1.92; TTO body wash 1.28, SD 1.79; P = 0.85) and no study patients developed MRSA bacteraemia. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with JBS, TTO body wash cannot be recommended as an effective means of reducing MRSA colonization.

Protocolized vs. non-protocolized weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill adult patients: Cochrane review protocol.

AIM: This paper is a report of the protocol for a review to identify, critically appraise and synthesize the best current evidence supporting the use of weaning protocols compared to non-protocolized practice in liberating patients from mechanical ventilation. BACKGROUND: Patients experiencing difficulty in weaning require a longer hospital stay and have higher morbidity and mortality. Consequently, efforts to reduce weaning time are desirable to reduce the duration of ventilation and related complications. Standardized weaning protocols are safe and effective in reducing the time spent on mechanical ventilation.Notwithstanding, the evidence supporting their use in practice is inconsistent. The discordant results of studies may reflect the fact that protocols vary in composition and are implemented in different environments by various healthcare providers. DESIGN: The objectives of this review are to compare the total duration of mechanical ventilation between patients weaned using protocols vs. non-protocolized practice; to ascertain differences between protocolized and non-protocolized weaning with regards to mortality, adverse events, quality of life, weaning duration, ICU and hospital stay; and to explore variation in outcomes by the type of ICU, the type of protocol and approach to delivering the protocol. We will search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ISI Web of Science and LILACS. In addition, we will endeavour to identify unpublished data and contact first authors of studies included in the review to obtain information on unpublished studies or work in progress. CONCLUSION: This review will provide much needed direction for healthcare professionals in intensive care in terms of both research and practice.

A randomized controlled trial of tea tree oil (5%) body wash versus standard body wash to prevent colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in critically ill adults: research protocol.

BACKGROUND: Over the past ten years MRSA has become endemic in hospitals and is associated with increased healthcare costs. Critically ill patients are most at risk, in part because of the number of invasive therapies that they require in the intensive care unit (ICU). Washing with 5% tea tree oil (TTO) has been shown to be effective in removing MRSA on the skin. However, to date, no trials have evaluated the potential of TTO body wash to prevent MRSA colonization or infection. In addition, detecting MRSA by usual culture methods is slow. A faster method using a PCR assay has been developed in the laboratory, but requires evaluation in a large number of patients. METHODS/DESIGN: This study protocol describes the design of a multicentre, phase II/III prospective open-label randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate whether a concentration of 5% TTO is effective in preventing MRSA colonization in comparison with a standard body wash (Johnsons Baby Softwash) in the ICU. In addition we will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TTO body wash and assess the effectiveness of the PCR assay in detecting MRSA in critically ill patients. On admission to intensive care, swabs from the nose and groin will be taken to screen for MRSA as per current practice. Patients will be randomly assigned to be washed with the standard body wash or TTO body wash. On discharge from the unit, swabs will be taken again to identify whether there is a difference in MRSA colonization between the two groups. DISCUSSION: If TTO body wash is found to be effective, widespread implementation of such a simple colonization prevention tool has the potential to impact on patient outcomes, healthcare resource use and patient confidence both nationally and internationally.

The difficult airway in adult critical care.

INTRODUCTION: The difficult airway is a common problem in adult critical care patients. However, the challenge is not just the establishment of a safe airway, but also maintaining that safety over days, weeks, or longer. AIMS: This review considers the management of the difficult airway in the adult critical care environment. Central themes are the recognition of the potentially difficult airway and the necessary preparation for (and management of) difficult intubation and extubation. Problems associated with tracheostomy tubes and tube displacement are also discussed. RESULTS: All patients in critical care should initially be viewed as having a potentially difficult airway. They also have less physiological reserve than patients undergoing airway interventions in association with elective surgery. Making the critical care environment as conducive to difficult airway management as the operating room requires planning and teamwork. Extubation of the difficult airway should always be viewed as a potentially difficult reintubation. Tube displacement or obstruction should be strongly suspected in situations of new-onset difficult ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care physicians are presented with a significant number of difficult airway problems both during the insertion and removal of the airway. Critical care physicians need to be familiar with the difficult airway algorithms and have skill with relevant airway adjuncts.

Clinical review: communication and logistics in the response to the 1998 terrorist bombing in Omagh, Northern Ireland.

The Omagh bombing in August 1998 produced many of the problems documented in other major incidents. An initial imbalance between the demand and supply of clinical resources at the local hospital, poor information due to telecommunication problems, the need to triage victims and the need to transport the most severely injured significant distances were the most serious issues. The Royal Group Hospitals Trust (RGHT) received 30 severely injured secondary transfers over a 5-hour period, which stressed the hospital's systems even with the presence of extra staff that arrived voluntarily before the hospital's major incident plan was activated. Many patients were transferred to the RGHT by helicopter, but much of the time the gained advantage was lost due to lack of a helipad within the RGHT site. Identifying patients and tracking them through the hospital system was problematic. While the major incident plan ensured that communication with the relatives and the media was effective and timely, communication between the key clinical and managerial staff was hampered by the need to be mobile and by the limitations of the internal telephone system. The use of mobile anaesthetic teams helped maintain the flow of patients between the Emergency Department and radiology, operating theatres or the intensive care unit (ICU). The mobile anaesthetic teams were also responsible for efficient and timely resupply of the Emergency Department, which worked well. In the days that followed many victims required further surgical procedures. Coordination of the multidisciplinary teams required for many of these procedures was difficult. Although only seven patients required admission to adult general intensive care, no ICU beds were available for other admissions over the following 5 days. A total of 165 days of adult ICU treatment were required for the victims of the bombing.

Optimum sedation and analgesia in critical illness: we need to keep trying.

Many studies have documented patients' distressing recollections of the intensive care unit (ICU). The study by van de Leur and colleagues, conducted in a group of surgical ICU patients with moderate severity of sickness, found that the frequency of such unpleasant memories was increased in those able to recall factual information about their stay in the ICU. The study did not include sedation scoring but it did use a simple tool to assess factual recall. This tool appeared reliable and could be easily applied in any ICU. Previous work strongly suggests that abolishing memory of ICU by using deep sedation would not be an appropriate response to these findings. Rather, we need to work on strategies that reduce distress by improving analgesia, reducing noxious stimuli (if possible) and, potentially, using pharmacology to produce a calm patient with minimal sedation. Achieving the latter is rarely possible today but it might become possible with future drug development.

Management of blast injuries and shock lung.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Blast injuries have always occurred both in civilian life and as acts of war or terrorism. Nowadays, the risk of being involved in an explosion has increased even for those living in countries with no previous experience of such events. It is our intention that this review is of assistance to those providing emergency/critical care to patients who have sustained blast injuries. RECENT FINDINGS: Exposure to blast may indirectly produce physiological insults such as bradycardia, hypotension, tissue hypoxia and oxidative stress. The use of early goal-directed therapy might be important in minimizing such insults. Explosions in an enclosed environment are associated with increased risk of pulmonary blast injury and also air and fat embolism. Mechanical ventilation after pulmonary blast injury is associated with barotrauma and the use of lung protective strategies previously recommended in acute lung injury may be beneficial. SUMMARY: The potential for blast to cause injury depends on the nature of the explosive and environment in which the blast occurs. Soft tissue injury with environmental contamination is frequent. Optimal antimicrobial cover and strategies such as selective digestive decontamination may be advantageous. Early surgery should follow the principles of 'damage control'. Blast injury often leads to severe sepsis/systemic inflammatory response, multiple organ dysfunction and prolonged critical illness. In this clinical scenario, recent studies have shown improved outcome with the use of activated protein C, steroid replacement and aggressive control of blood glucose but have been less convincing regarding the use of immuno-nutrition.

The metabolic and nutritional response to critical illness.

The metabolic response to critical illness promotes catabolism, which mobilizes substrates for energy. Initially the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is stimulated, but later there appears to be anterior pituitary depression. Despite this, the early increase in plasma cortisol levels is usually maintained by means independent of (falling) corticotropin levels. Some patients, however, develop acute adrenal insufficiency and appear to benefit from replacement exogenous glucocorticoid. However, identifying such patients is often difficult. The replacement of other deficiencies may not be in the patients' interests. For example, leptin, a stress-related hormone, has multiple effects, some seemingly advantageous and others detrimental in critical illness. Its overall influence and significance remains unclear.The health of gut mucosa and the inflammatory response might be improved or influenced to the (presumed) benefit of the patient by agents such as glutamine, arginine, some eicosanoids, and exogenous nucleic acids. Such "immunonutrition" appears to improve mortality and other measures of outcome in surgical intensive care unit patients and those with sepsis.