ABSTRACT
An average of 60-80% of all menopausal women experience bothersome vasomotor symptoms (VMSs), such as flushing and sweating, within the first seven years of onset. However, despite increasing prevalence, these hot flashes remain hard to treat and have a negative effect on the quality of life. Though hormone replacement therapy is commonly utilized as a standard treatment for VMSs, this therapy is not recommended for all women. Specifically, the oral form of hormone replacement therapy is associated with several contraindications, including a history of thromboembolic disease, migraine headache with aura, liver failure, heart disease, and hormone-dependent cancers. For women with these medical conditions, current literature indicates that nonhormonal therapies such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are suitable alternatives to reduce the frequency and intensity of VMSs. Currently, the only SSRI that is FDA-approved for the treatment of VMSs is paroxetine, but studies show that fluoxetine, citalopram, escitalopram, and sertraline are also proven to provide similar benefits. Similarly, the SNRI venlafaxine has also been well tolerated and has been shown to reduce the frequency and severity of hot flashes. The present investigation reviews the physiology of VMSs and examines the evidence for the use of nonhormonal pharmacologic therapies as treatment for women experiencing hot flashes. These interventions should be considered whenever hormone replacement therapy is contraindicated, with therapy individualized based on the severity of symptoms.
ABSTRACT
Acetaminophen is an extremely common drug with many implications for its analgesic and antipyretic properties. It has a unique mechanism of action and downstream effects that separate it categorically from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. These differences come with potential adverse effects that range from mild drug reactions to severe life-threatening emergencies. While acetaminophen's toxic liver effects are well known, a lesser-known adverse effect of this drug is its association with the development of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). These dermatological emergencies involve similar pathological processes, including apoptosis of the epidermis and sloughing of the dermis and mucosa from the underlying layers with a positive Nikolsky sign. Currently, SJS and TEN are considered immune-mediated type IV hypersensitivity reactions predominantly involving CD8+ T lymphocytes. Other immune mediators, including regulatory T cells, natural killer cells, interleukins, and drug metabolites are speculated to be involved, but their mechanisms have not been entirely determined. These conditions are differentially diagnosed by the percentage of body area affected with SJS and TENS, involving <10% and >30%, respectively. Genomic variations in human leukocyte antigens (HLA) genes have been implicated in the susceptibility and severity of acetaminophen-induced SJS/TENS, however, details of these interactions remain unclear. Acetaminophen's widespread use and the morbidity of its associated skin pathologies SJS and TENS warrant an in-depth examination of the causative processes involved in their pathogenesis. It is critical that both physicians and patients be made aware that while acetaminophen is widely tolerated by most individuals, severe and potentially fatal interactions do occur, and further investigation is necessary to reduce these adverse effects.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Utilizing laryngeal mask airways to maintain patients' airways is advantageous because it enables the anesthesiologist to keep the patient spontaneously inhaling and is less traumatic to the airway than intubation. Newer designs such as the Gnana laryngeal mask airway design permit real-time suctioning while the mask is on a patient. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of the efficacy of Gnana laryngeal airway 4 (GLA-4) in 50 patients undergoing colonoscopy. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia were provided with propofol; GLA-4 was applied to secure the airway; and correct placement was verified. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included in the study (44% female, 56% male, mean age: 56.5 years, mean BMI: 33.3). Twelve patients were assigned American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 2, and 38 were assigned ASA class 3. The first attempt of GLA-4 insertion was successful in 47 patients, and two attempts were required for the successful placement of the GLA-4 in two patients. The successful placement was not achieved in one patient. The average time to successful insertion was 27.1 ± 3.9s. The average volume of oropharyngeal secretions suctioned through the suction catheter was 9.96 ± 2.31 mL. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in the 50 patients. There were no reports of sore throat, hoarseness, dysphagia, or cough immediately postop. CONCLUSION: GLA-4 can be inserted safely with adequate periglottic occlusion. This laryngeal mask is unique and desirable due to its ability to evacuate oropharyngeal secretions while in place to prevent laryngospasm. To establish the role of GLA-4 in broader clinical situations, additional clinical trials and studies are required.
