Relationship between anxiety disorders and opiate dependence--a systematic review of the literature: implications for diagnosis and treatment.

Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence and temporal sequence of co-occurrence of anxiety disorders with opiate dependence in order to better define the relationship between these two disorders and to improve diagnosis and treatment. The search used Medline and Toxibase up to January 1, 2009, and was based on a systematic review method. Eighteen studies were found. Prevalence of anxiety disorders assessed by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria was high in opiate-dependent treated persons (lifetime prevalence ranged from 26% to 35%). Among anxiety disorders, phobic disorders have been shown to often precede the onset of opiate dependence. The identification of substance-induced versus independent anxiety disorder has important treatment implication. The monitoring of anxiety symptoms after several weeks of abstinence may allow physicians to determine the relationship between dependence and anxiety and make a reliable diagnosis of any initial anxious disorder. Specific management of anxiety disorder may then be used.

Self-perceived motivation for benzodiazepine use and behavior related to benzodiazepine use among opiate-dependent patients.

Clinical observations have shown a high prevalence of benzodiazepine use among opiate-dependent patients. Our objective was to identify if distinct patterns of behavior could be associated with three different self-perceived motivations for benzodiazepine use: (a) exclusive self-therapeutic motivation, (b) exclusive hedonic motivation, and (c) combined self-therapeutic and hedonic motivation. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire in 92 opiate users in treatment in France (Aquitaine). The behaviors associated with exclusive self-therapeutic motivation included the search for an anxiolytic effect, oral administration, use within the context of a medical prescription, and use without other substances. The behaviors associated with exclusive hedonic motivation were use in combination with other substances, the obtaining of benzodiazepines by the black market, and use of other routes of administration in search of a "blackout." Among patients who reported both motivations, there were distinct trends of behavior according to motivation.

Benzodiazepine use among opiate-dependent subjects in buprenorphine maintenance treatment: correlates of use, abuse and dependence.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies from North America, Europe and Australia have reported high levels of benzodiazepine use among opiate-dependent patients in opiate maintenance treatment. However, to date, there are no available data on patterns of abuse and dependence on benzodiazepines according to DSM criteria among these patients. AIMS: To describe the independent correlates of use, abuse and dependence on benzodiazepines among buprenorphine patients selected from standard treatment settings. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in France between June 2001 and June 2004. Buprenorphine patients treated for over 3 months were recruited via physicians prescribing buprenorphine. Patients answered a self-administered questionnaire, the DSM-IV criteria for benzodiazepine abuse and dependence, the Beck Anxiety and Depression Inventories (BAI, BDI) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). Main outcome was modalities of benzodiazepine use: no use vs. simple use vs. problematic use (abuse or dependence according to DSM-IV). RESULTS: 170 patients were recruited. 54% did not use benzodiazepines during the previous month, 15% were simple users and 31% were problematic users. Benzodiazepine use (all modalities) was associated with poly-use of psychotropics. Simple users of benzodiazepines were not statistically different from non-users for the other factors explored. Problematic users of benzodiazepines had higher depression and anxiety levels, correlated with quality of life impairment and precariousness. They used higher dosages of benzodiazepines than simple users. CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of simple benzodiazepine users were distinct from problematic users but not from non-users in this sample of buprenorphine patients. This should be taken into account in the clinical management of benzodiazepine use among buprenorphine patients.

Comparison of prescriber evaluations and patient-directed self-reports in office-based practice for buprenorphine treatment of opiate-dependent individuals in France, 2002.

The objective of this cross-sectional evaluation study was to compare data generated through prescriber assessments, and data generated from independent direct contact with opiate-dependent patients in office-based practice to evaluate buprenorphine treatment for modality of buprenorphine absorption, benzodiazepine use, and depressive symptoms. A group of buprenorphine office-based practice prescribers was selected to participate in this study. They were asked to screen for inclusion all their patients coming for a visit from February to August 2002. Once included by their prescribing physician, patients were given a series of self-administered questionnaires to be returned directly to the research staff, independently of their prescriber. Each prescriber was given a questionnaire to complete based on their knowledge and interview of the patient. Items assessed were history of current treatment, current substance use, buprenorphine treatment related behavior (daily frequency of intake, route of administration), benzodiazepine use and existence of a major depressive episode. Prescribers and patients' questionnaires were compared. Concordance of both assessments was assessed by kappa statistics. The sensitivity and specificity as well as the positive and negative predictive values of prescriber collected information were compared to that of their patients'. There was an overall good correlation between both data sources on the procedures for buprenorphine use especially for intravenous use of buprenorphine. There were important variations: obtaining buprenorphine without a prescription or with a prescription made by another doctor, intravenous administration of buprenorphine, use of benzodiazepines, and depression were underestimated by prescribers.

[Benzodiazepine withdrawal in subjects on opiate substitution treatment]. / Sevrage aux benzodiazépines des sujets dépendants aux opiacés en traitement de substitution.

INTRODUCTION: Benzodiazepines are the most widely used psychotropic agents in the world. Abuse and dependence are reported in the general population and among drug misusers, including those dependent on heroine. Benzodiazepine use by heroine users increases their risk of overdose, not only from heroin but also substitution drugs such as methadone and more recently buprenorphine. Hence, detoxification from benzodiazepines is desirable. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper was to review the literature and determine the best benzodiazepine detoxification procedure for opiate-dependent individuals receiving substitution treatment. METHODS: Relevant studies were sought through systematic searches of Medline and Toxibase (a database focusing on substance abuse). RESULTS: There were fewer controlled studies than expected about benzodiazepine detoxification, and all of them excluded subjects who misused opiates or were in opiate substitution treatment. The best evidence supports a procedure where the patient is switched to a long-lasting benzodiazepine and the dose then tapered by 25% of the initial dose each week. Diazepam is the drug most often used in the framework. In opiate users, diazepam may raise special problems of misuse, as suggested by clinical and epidemiologic studies. Nonetheless, diazepam is the only benzodiazepine found to be effective for this withdrawal in controlled studies and some studies indicate that unprescribed diazepam use in heroin users is sometimes motivated by the desire to alleviate withdrawal symptoms and discomfort. CONCLUSION: Although diazepam appears to have potential for abuse, the available data does not rule out its therapeutic interest for benzodiazepine withdrawal in patients on opiate substitution treatment in an adequate treatment setting. Specific studies of this population are needed.