ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the capacity of ultrasonographic image-based measurements of gingival height and alveolar bone level for monitoring periodontal health and disease. METHODS: Sixteen subjects were recruited from patients scheduled to receive dental care and classified as periodontally healthy (n = 10) or diseased (n = 6) according to clinical guidelines. A 40-MHz ultrasound system was used to measure gingival recession, gingival height, alveolar bone level, and gingival thickness from 66 teeth for comparison to probing measurements of pocket depth and clinical attachment level. Interexaminer variability and comparison between ultrasound measurements and probing measurements was performed via Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Gingival recession and its risk in non-recessed patients could be determined via measurement of the supra- and subgingival cementoenamel junction relative to the gingival margin. Interexaminer bias for ultrasound image analysis was negligible (<0.10 mm) for imaged gingival height (iGH) and 0.45 mm for imaged alveolar bone level (iABL). Diseased subjects had significantly higher imaging measurements (iGH, iABL) and clinical measurements (probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level) than healthy subjects (p < 0.05). Subtraction of the average biologic width from iGH resulted in 83% agreement (≤1 mm difference) between iGH and probing pocket depth measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography has an equivalent diagnostic capacity as gold-standard physical probing for periodontal metrics while offering more detailed anatomical information.
