Montreal cognitive assessment as a screening instrument for cognitive impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus patients without overt neuropsychiatric manifestations.

OBJECTIVES: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is an increasingly used screening tool for cognitive impairment. The aim of this study was to examine how MoCA performed in identifying cognitive impairment (CI) domains in SLE patients compared with formal standardized neuropsychological testing (NPT). Factors related to SLE disease, immunologic and psychological state associated with CI were also explored. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 50 SLE patients without overt neuropsychiatric manifestations from April 2017 to May 2018. The patients were evaluated with MoCA, formal NPT and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS) 42-item self-report questionnaire. Values of sensitivity and specificity were computed for different cut-offs of MoCA within each cognitive domain of NPT and descriptive analysis was used to identify the factors affecting cognitive function. RESULTS: The median score for MoCA was 27.5 (range 22-30). Using a MoCA cutoff of <26, 18 (36%) were identified to have CI using NPT compared to 8 (16%) using MoCA. The most frequently affected cognitive domain was executive functioning with 15 affected patients. Sensitivities and specificities of the MoCA range from 50% to 100% and 5.7% to 16.7%, respectively, across cognitive domains. A lower MoCA cutoff of <25 improve sensitivity of identifying impairment in executive functioning from 60% to 80%. In univariate analysis, DASS scores, disease activity, presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, presence of concurrent autoimmune disease, current, and cumulative corticosteroid therapy did not predict cognitive performance. CONCLUSION: MoCA may be a useful screening tool to identify the most frequently affected cognitive domain which is executive functioning using a lower cutoff of <25 in SLE patients without overt neuropsychiatric manifestations.

Mortality and hospitalization outcomes of interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension in the Singapore systemic sclerosis cohort.

OBJECTIVES: We compared mortality and hospitalization rates in four groups of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) [isolated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) or interstitial lung disease (ILD), concomitant ILD-pulmonary hypertension (PH), and no/mild pulmonary involvement]. METHODS: In the Systemic Sclerosis Cohort Singapore (SCORE), ILD was diagnosed by HRCT and significant ILD was defined by forced vital capacity <70% predicted. Patients were classified as PAH if echocardiographic systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) ≥50 mmHg or right heart catheterization (RHC) mean PAP ≥25 mmHg. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with mortality and hospital admissions per year. Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze survival. RESULTS: Of 490 SSc patients, 50 patients had PAH, 92 patients had ILD and 43 patients had ILD-PH. Of 93 patients with PAH or ILD-PH, 56 were based on echocardiography and 37 on RHC. Patients with ILD-PH (HR 3.77, 95% CI: 2.05-6.93) had the highest risk of death, followed by PAH (HR 3.03, 95% CI: 1.60-5.76) and ILD (HR 1.84, 95% CI: 1.04-3.28). After adjustment for confounders, PAH (HR 2.39, 95% CI: 1.13-5.07) remained independently associated with mortality, but not ILD-PH or ILD. Other factors associated with mortality were male gender, age at SSc diagnosis, malabsorption and digital ulcer/ gangrene. Increased hospitalization rate was associated with renal crisis, right heart failure and PAH medications, but not SSc groups. CONCLUSION: PAH is an independent risk factor of mortality in SSc. Increased hospitalization rate was not associated with SSc groups. Other factors associated with increased mortality and hospital admissions were identified.

Validation of the UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument 2.0 in English- and Chinese-speaking patients in a multi-ethnic Singapore systemic sclerosis cohort.

The aim of this study was to (1) translate the Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument (GIT) 2.0 from English to Chinese and (2) validate both versions in a multi-ethnic systemic sclerosis cohort in Singapore (SCORE). The English GIT2.0 was translated to Chinese using a standard forward-backward translation approach. Psychometric evaluation of the GIT2.0 included internal consistency reliability (using Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability (using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)), scale level factor analysis, and construct validity (using Spearman correlation) against the modified Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (S-HAQ) and the SF-36 v2. Most of the patients were females (88.6%) and Chinese (78.2%), with mean (SD) age of 51.0 (13.0) years and median disease duration of 4.5 years. We administered English (n = 146) and Chinese (n = 74) GIT2.0. The mean (SD) total GIT score was 0.29 (0.37). There was good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha >0.70 for all subscales) and good test-retest reliability for the scale and all subscales (ICC 0.71-0.92) except for "diarrhoea" (ICC = 0.54). Our hypothesised a priori construct validity was supported by moderate correlations between the total GIT score and S-HAQ GI subscale (r = 0.446), and the social functioning subscale and SF36v2 role-social domain (r = 0.337), and weak-to-moderate correlation between the emotional subscale and SF-36v2 role-emotional (r = 0.295) and mental health (r = 0.298) domains and mental component summary (r = 0.356). Exploratory factor analysis of the seven subscales yielded a two-factor solution explaining 69.63% of the total variance. This study provides evidence for the reliability and validity of the English and Chinese GIT2.0 to be used in Singapore for research and routine practice.

Achieving consensus in ultrasonography synovitis scoring in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasonography is sensitive for synovitis detection but interobserver variation in both acquisition and image interpretation is still a concern. The objective was to assess if a short collegiate consensus would improve inter-observer reliability in scoring of synovitis. METHODS: Eight rheumatologists (Singapore) participated in a 1-day consensus meeting divided into: (i) still-image interpretation and consensus followed by; (ii) image acquisition and interpretation, according to definitions and synovitis scoring rules endorsed by Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) and TUI (Targeted Ultrasound Initiative). Interobserver reliability of semiquantitative scoring in B-mode, Power Doppler (PDUS) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)-OMERACT PDUS composite score was assessed by intraclass correlation co-efficient (ICC). Agreement at the joint region level was calculated using prevalence-adjusted-biased-adjusted-kappa (PABAK). RESULTS: For B-mode still images, ICC was good at 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.82) while for PDUS images this was excellent at ICC = 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.92) with ICC improving by 12% for B-mode and 13% for PDUS respectively. During image acquisition and interpretation, B-mode scoring showed ICC = 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.84) while for PDUS the ICC was lower at 0.59 (95% CI 0.48-0.72). The ICC for OMERACT PDUS composite synovitis scoring was good at 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.85). At the joint level, agreement varied with PABAK being excellent in the small joints of the hands but poor to fair in the wrists, elbows, ankles and metatarsophalangeal joints, and no agreement at the knees (PABAK range -0.34 to 0.85). CONCLUSION: A consensus meeting was useful in improving interobserver variation in US synovitis scoring of still images, but image acquisition and interpretation especially in non-hand joints require further standardization.

Major trends in the manifestations and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in a multiethnic cohort in Singapore.

We analyzed the epidemiological changes of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over three decades using patients from a single center in Singapore. All patients who fulfill the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA were invited to enroll in a prospective disease registry. We analyzed the patient demographics, disease manifestation, management and patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life (QoL), in the three categories according to the year of disease onset: before 1989 (group I), 1990-1999 (group II) and after 2000 (group III). There were 1,153 patients with 231, 532 and 390 in groups I, II and III, respectively. The mean disease durations were 25, 12 and 4.8 years, respectively. The majority was female (84.1 %) and Chinese (76.6 %) with no socio-demographic differences across the three periods. The age of onset rises and the prevalence of rheumatoid factor falls with the proximity of disease onset. Patients with most recent disease onset had the earliest access to the rheumatologist. They also had the highest tender and swollen joint counts, lowest deformed joint count and highest remission rate. Patients in group I report better mental and emotional QoL though many developed marked disability. We have documented changes of the manifestations of RA that are dependent and independent of improved treatment. Significant differences in accessibility to the rheumatologist, RA activity, functional capacity, quality of life and comorbidities were seen in subsequent cohorts due to treatment evolution and more efficient healthcare delivery.

Urine sVCAM-1 and sICAM-1 levels are elevated in lupus nephritis.

AIM: We sought to evaluate the relationship of urine levels of soluble cellular adhesion molecules sVCAM-1 (vascular) and sICAM-1 (intercellular) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with or without lupus nephritis, and to explore their correlation with renal disease activity. METHODS: Paired serum and urine samples of 121 Asian SLE patients, and urine samples of 19 normal healthy controls were collected. Demographic data, disease activity and damage scores, and selected laboratory parameters, including levels of anti-double stranded DNA antibody, complements C3, C4, and creatinine were captured. Renal disease activity was scored with renal SLE Activity Measure revised (rSLAM-R). Serum and urine sVCAM-1 and sICAM-1 levels were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Urinary sVCAM-1 and sICAM-1 were elevated in SLE patients compared to controls. Significantly higher levels of urine sVCAM-1 found in patients with active lupus nephritis correlated with rSLAM-R. In addtion, significantly more patients with active lupus nephritis had detectable levels of urine sICAM-1, but no correlation with renal activity was observed. CONCLUSION: Urinary sVCAM-1 may serve as a potential biomarker for early diagnosis of lupus nephritis as levels correlated with even mild abnormalities of urine sediment. In addition, both urine sVCAM-1 and sICAM-1 levels may be useful in identifying patients at risk of lupus nephritis.