Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J West Afr Coll Surg ; 14(3): 295-300, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38988422

ABSTRACT

Aim: Several studies had investigated the importance and benefit of pelvic floor exercises (PFEs) to the pregnant women and their unborn babies, however, the concerns of antenatal women on the exercise have been sparsely investigated. This study examined the attitude and concerns of pregnant women towards engaging in PFEs in Ibadan, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: This was cross-sectional study of pregnant women aged ≥15 years. Participants were recruited at primary, secondary and tertiary health facilities. A face-to-face interview was conducted using a structured questionnaire with open and close-ended questions for data collection. Bivariate analysis was performed using chi-square and Fisher's exact test to investigate the association between categorical variables. Multivariate analysis was performed with log-binomial and multinomial regressions to select significant variables that affect the attitude of pregnant women. Results: Of the 373 pregnant women recruited, 118 had ever practiced PFEs. A little below average (43%) performed PFE for less than 3 days a week. Ability to have easy childbirth was the most common motivator for practicing PFE. Participants were most concerned about abdominal pain. No association between any of the factors and participants' attitudes. Conclusion: Though there was a positive attitude of pregnant women towards the PFE but the practice was low. This might be due to inadequate availability of information. We recommend health promotional messages to encourage pregnant women to engage in PFE as part of antenatal messages for healthy living.

2.
Heliyon ; 8(10): e10902, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36210864

ABSTRACT

Background: COVID-19 lockdown was associated with disruption of daily life, economy, essential health services including maternal health service, and psychological reflexes such as panic, sleep disorders, fear, anxiety, and depression. Aim: To assess the perception of pregnant women on the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and the prevalence of common mental health disorders (CMHD) among pregnant women. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 380 pregnant women at the University College Hospital (UCH) Ibadan; participants were enrolled using a simple random sampling technique. Data was collected using pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire. Information obtained - sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics, perception and reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown, effect on ANC, coping mechanisms, and presence of CMHD (anxiety and depression) were measured using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Data were analysed using STATA 16.0 Software. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were performed. The level of significance was p-value < 0.05. Results: The mean age was 32 ± 4.78 years, most respondents were <35 years (75%), married (97.1%), had a higher education (89%) and multiparous (70%). About 43.9% were worried that COVID-19 would affect pregnancy care, 42.9% reported it affected care and 81.6% were not worried it would affect the delivery care. Among respondents, 96.6% were able to cope with the effects of the pandemic and 96.8% enjoyed good social support. Respondents did not have CMHD (88.16%), 7.9% had CMHD (4.74% had depression and 3.16% had anxiety) and 3.95% had co-morbid depression and anxiety. On multinomial regression analysis, relative to anxiety or depression only, respondents with combined depression and anxiety had higher odds of having no delivery plan and thought COVID-19 may affect their delivery. Conclusion: Only a few women reported anxiety and depression symptoms during the lockdown and those with anxiety or combined symptoms of anxiety and depression had no birth plan and believed that COVID-19 would affect their delivery.

3.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 156(1): 42-47, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33626180

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of postpartum urinary retention (PUR) after vaginal delivery and associated risk factors. METHODS: A total of 250 women were recruited following vaginal delivery at the UCH, Ibadan. Sociodemographic and obstetrical data were collected using a pro forma. Transabdominal ultrasound scan of the urinary bladder was performed 6 hours after delivery to estimate the post-void residual bladder volume (PVRBV) of participants. PVRBV was compared with obstetrical characteristics and labor events. Data collected were analyzed using SPSS 17.0. The level of statistical significance was set at P value less than 0.05. RESULTS: The incidence of PUR was 17.6%. Women with PUR, had longer duration of first stage (591 versus 501 minutes; P = 0.001), and second stage (50 versus 32 minute; P < 0.001) of labor compared with those without PUR. There was evidence that augmentation of labor (P < 0.01), catheterization during labor (P < 0.01), perineal injury (P < 0.01), and episiotomy (P < 0.01) were associated with developing PUR. Also, women with PUR were more likely to experience storage and obstructive urinary symptoms than those without PUR. Resolution of PUR occurred within 24 hours. CONCLUSION: This study showed that postpartum urinary retention is relatively common following vaginal delivery. Awareness of risk factors will increase index of suspicion especially in women with storage and obstructive symptoms.


Subject(s)
Puerperal Disorders , Urinary Retention , Female , Humans , Incidence , Nigeria/epidemiology , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Puerperal Disorders/epidemiology , Puerperal Disorders/etiology , Risk Factors , Tertiary Care Centers , Urinary Retention/epidemiology , Urinary Retention/etiology
4.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 42(5): 1280-1285, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34704518

ABSTRACT

A 16-year review of causes, clinical presentation and management outcomes of Acquired gynatresia (AG) at University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Information was obtained using a proforma and data analysed using SPSS version 20.0. The mean age of the 31 women with AG was 35.6 ± 6.2 years. The majority (90.3%) were married and had a tertiary level of education. The mean parity was 0.74 ± 1.1 and 54.8% were nulliparous while 29.0% were primiparous women. The commonest cause of AG was the insertion of caustic substances into the vagina and this was mainly for the treatment of uterine fibroid (68.2%) and infertility (54.5%). Over three-quarters presented with dyspareunia while 54.8% had infertility. A majority (87.1%) had one-stage surgery with dissection/excision of fibrotic tissue being the commonest (45.2%) and sigmoid vaginoplasty the least performed. Postoperative complications were seen in 29.0% of cases. Acquired gynatresia remains a condition of public health interest despite an increase in female education and relatively improved health care in Nigeria.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Acquired gynatresia (AG) could be of chemical and non-chemical origin and result from certain cultural beliefs and practices.What do the results of this study add? Irrespective of the women's level of education, there is inadequate awareness of the implications of inserting caustic materials into the vagina. However, there is a high success rate of treatment of AG.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? There is a need to increase health education and awareness of the populace on the causes of AG and its associated complications.


Subject(s)
Caustics , Gynatresia , Infertility , Adult , Female , Gynatresia/etiology , Humans , Nigeria , Pregnancy , Vagina/abnormalities , Vagina/surgery
5.
Niger Postgrad Med J ; 28(4): 240-246, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34850750

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As the spread of COVID-19 continues, the disease and its sequels affect antenatal, intrapartum and post-partum care, thus making pregnant women and their babies vulnerable. This study assessed the knowledge of COVID-19 disease and determinants of correct knowledge among pregnant women at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among pregnant women. Data collected were analysed with STATA 16.0 software. Descriptive, bivariate and multinomial regression analyses were performed. The primary outcomes were awareness of COVID-19 (yes/no), correct knowledge, and determinants. RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty participants were interviewed. The mean age was 32 years (±4.78). A little over a third (37%) were aged 30-34 years, married (97.1%), Yoruba (86.6%), had tertiary education (89.0), in skilled occupation (54.6%) and not well-exposed to media (56.7%). The knowledge of COVID-19 was good (15%), fair (79%), and poor (6%). About 19.6%, 66.7% and 13.7% of participants who had poor, fair and good knowledge, respectively, believed that COVID-19 exists (P = 0.007). The factors associated with good knowledge include occupation, income, level of education and exposure to media (P value <0.05). On multinomial logistic regression, occupation was significantly associated with good knowledge, while being less exposed to media was significantly associated with having poor knowledge. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women had fair knowledge of COVID-19 disease; occupation, level of education, exposure to media and income are associated with having correct knowledge. Misinformation and misconception about COVID-19 disease may affect maternal health utilization and pregnancy outcomes. Antenatal care presents an opportunity to provide health education and increase the knowledge of COVID-19 among pregnant women.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Nigeria/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...